通过药物调配入门轮转提高药剂学二年级学生的自我认知能力。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100750
Jared M. Repas, Maria C. (Pruchnicki) Coyle, Fadwa Constandinidis Revelos, Marjorie M. Winhoven, Junan Li, Julie E. Legg
{"title":"通过药物调配入门轮转提高药剂学二年级学生的自我认知能力。","authors":"Jared M. Repas,&nbsp;Maria C. (Pruchnicki) Coyle,&nbsp;Fadwa Constandinidis Revelos,&nbsp;Marjorie M. Winhoven,&nbsp;Junan Li,&nbsp;Julie E. Legg","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is an essential health care function that is particularly relevant to pharmacists’ expertise and a learning opportunity for pharmacy students. Our objective was to assess change across clinical competence, confidence, and communication skills after the completion of a MedRec rotation by second-year pharmacy students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective post-then-pre-survey including 29 questions was developed/delivered to students after the completion of required MedRec hours. The primary end point was the change in 3 domains via summed scores from individual questions. Cohen’s difference (d) was used to determine group effect size change. The secondary end points included individual question change, perceived patient impact, and subgroup analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 115 second-year pharmacy students, 81.7% (n = 94) participated in the study. Students self-reported increases on the Likert scale (0–10) of 2.49 ± 1.90 in clinical competency domain, 3.57 ± 2.13 in confidence domain , and 3.12 ± 2.15 in communication skills domain, representing statistically significant and large group effect changes across all 3. A total of 21 of the 22 individual questions had large group effect changes; 1 question (nursing communications) had a moderate group effect change. Student perception of MedRec impact on patient care (Likert scale 0–10) was positive: post-rotation score 7.39 ± 1.57.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first larger-scale study that examines student-evaluated outcomes of a MedRec-based rotation. Students self-reported high levels of post-rotation competency across all domains; students from ethnic minorities and with less work/MedRec experience increased their lower pre-rotation scores to statistically similar post-rotation scores, compared with non-minority and more experienced peers. Further study of the model and outcomes is advised.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592410469X/pdfft?md5=fdf09ddc004055741b5c315fa4a05750&pid=1-s2.0-S000294592410469X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Self-Perceived Competencies of Second-Year Pharmacy Students Through an Introductory Medication Reconciliation Rotation\",\"authors\":\"Jared M. Repas,&nbsp;Maria C. (Pruchnicki) Coyle,&nbsp;Fadwa Constandinidis Revelos,&nbsp;Marjorie M. Winhoven,&nbsp;Junan Li,&nbsp;Julie E. Legg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is an essential health care function that is particularly relevant to pharmacists’ expertise and a learning opportunity for pharmacy students. Our objective was to assess change across clinical competence, confidence, and communication skills after the completion of a MedRec rotation by second-year pharmacy students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective post-then-pre-survey including 29 questions was developed/delivered to students after the completion of required MedRec hours. The primary end point was the change in 3 domains via summed scores from individual questions. Cohen’s difference (d) was used to determine group effect size change. The secondary end points included individual question change, perceived patient impact, and subgroup analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 115 second-year pharmacy students, 81.7% (n = 94) participated in the study. Students self-reported increases on the Likert scale (0–10) of 2.49 ± 1.90 in clinical competency domain, 3.57 ± 2.13 in confidence domain , and 3.12 ± 2.15 in communication skills domain, representing statistically significant and large group effect changes across all 3. A total of 21 of the 22 individual questions had large group effect changes; 1 question (nursing communications) had a moderate group effect change. Student perception of MedRec impact on patient care (Likert scale 0–10) was positive: post-rotation score 7.39 ± 1.57.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first larger-scale study that examines student-evaluated outcomes of a MedRec-based rotation. Students self-reported high levels of post-rotation competency across all domains; students from ethnic minorities and with less work/MedRec experience increased their lower pre-rotation scores to statistically similar post-rotation scores, compared with non-minority and more experienced peers. Further study of the model and outcomes is advised.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592410469X/pdfft?md5=fdf09ddc004055741b5c315fa4a05750&pid=1-s2.0-S000294592410469X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592410469X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592410469X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:药物调配(MedRec)是一项基本的医疗保健职能,与药剂师的专业知识尤为相关,也是药剂学专业学生的学习机会。我们的目的是评估药剂学二年级学生在完成药物调配(MedRec)轮转后在临床能力、信心和沟通技巧方面的变化:方法:在完成规定的 MedRec 学时后,我们为学生制定并发放了一份包括 29 个问题的事后和事前回顾调查。主要终点是通过单个问题的总分得出的三个领域的变化。科恩差异(d)用于确定群体效应大小的变化。次要终点包括单个问题的变化、患者感受到的影响以及亚组分析:在 115 名 P2 学生中,81.7%(n=94)参加了研究。在李克特量表(0-10)中,学生自我报告临床能力领域的提高幅度为(2.49±1.90)(pConclusion):据我们所知,这是第一项对基于医学康复的轮转学生评估结果进行的大规模研究。学生们自我报告说,轮转后在所有领域的能力都达到了较高水平;与非少数民族学生和经验较丰富的学生相比,少数民族学生和工作/医疗实习经验较少的学生在轮转前的得分较低,而轮转后的得分在统计上相差无几。建议对该模式和结果进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Self-Perceived Competencies of Second-Year Pharmacy Students Through an Introductory Medication Reconciliation Rotation

Objective

Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is an essential health care function that is particularly relevant to pharmacists’ expertise and a learning opportunity for pharmacy students. Our objective was to assess change across clinical competence, confidence, and communication skills after the completion of a MedRec rotation by second-year pharmacy students.

Methods

A retrospective post-then-pre-survey including 29 questions was developed/delivered to students after the completion of required MedRec hours. The primary end point was the change in 3 domains via summed scores from individual questions. Cohen’s difference (d) was used to determine group effect size change. The secondary end points included individual question change, perceived patient impact, and subgroup analyses.

Results

Of 115 second-year pharmacy students, 81.7% (n = 94) participated in the study. Students self-reported increases on the Likert scale (0–10) of 2.49 ± 1.90 in clinical competency domain, 3.57 ± 2.13 in confidence domain , and 3.12 ± 2.15 in communication skills domain, representing statistically significant and large group effect changes across all 3. A total of 21 of the 22 individual questions had large group effect changes; 1 question (nursing communications) had a moderate group effect change. Student perception of MedRec impact on patient care (Likert scale 0–10) was positive: post-rotation score 7.39 ± 1.57.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first larger-scale study that examines student-evaluated outcomes of a MedRec-based rotation. Students self-reported high levels of post-rotation competency across all domains; students from ethnic minorities and with less work/MedRec experience increased their lower pre-rotation scores to statistically similar post-rotation scores, compared with non-minority and more experienced peers. Further study of the model and outcomes is advised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
期刊最新文献
Address of the President-Elect at the 2024 AACP Annual Meeting: Reach Out, Engage, and Elevate Through Interconnectedness. Teaching and Assessing Pharmacy Students in Medication-Use Process Stewardship. Qualitative analysis of mental health stressors among pharmacy and medical students between 2009-2020. Redesigned Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) Assessments Reduce Grade Inflation in the Experiential Setting. Large Language Models and NAPLEX Practice Questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1