停用羟氯喹或氯喹后病情缓解的系统性红斑狼疮患者复发的风险。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Joint Bone Spine Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105756
{"title":"停用羟氯喹或氯喹后病情缓解的系统性红斑狼疮患者复发的风险。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Previous studies have provided evidence that the discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and chloroquine (CQ), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of disease flares, with limited information on the level of disease activity at the time of HCQ/CQ discontinuation. Here we aimed to describe the risk of SLE flare after withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Case-control study (1:2) comparing the evolution of patients with SLE after HCQ/CQ withdrawal for antimalarial retinopathy (cases) with patients with SLE matched for sex, antimalarial treatment duration and age at SLE diagnosis, whose antimalarial treatment was continued throughout the entire follow-up period (controls). To be included in the study, patients had to be in remission for at least one year according to the DORIS classification. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient experiencing a flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index after a 36-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We studied 48 cases and 96 controls. The proportion of patients experiencing a flare was significantly higher in the HCQ/CQ withdrawal group as compared to the maintenance group (15 [31.3%] patients versus 12 [12.5%]; OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.2–8.2], <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). Withdrawal of HCQ/CQ was inferior with respect to occurrence of severe SLE flare (12 [25.0%] vs 11 [11.5%]; OR 2.5 [95%CI 0.9–6.9], <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.053) and time to first flare (HR 6.3 [2.0–19.9], <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.005). Elevated serum levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies were identified as a risk factor for SLE flare following HCQ/CQ discontinuation (HR 5.4 [1.5–18.7], <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54902,"journal":{"name":"Joint Bone Spine","volume":"91 6","pages":"Article 105756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of flare in patients with SLE in remission after hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine withdrawal\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Previous studies have provided evidence that the discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and chloroquine (CQ), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of disease flares, with limited information on the level of disease activity at the time of HCQ/CQ discontinuation. Here we aimed to describe the risk of SLE flare after withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Case-control study (1:2) comparing the evolution of patients with SLE after HCQ/CQ withdrawal for antimalarial retinopathy (cases) with patients with SLE matched for sex, antimalarial treatment duration and age at SLE diagnosis, whose antimalarial treatment was continued throughout the entire follow-up period (controls). To be included in the study, patients had to be in remission for at least one year according to the DORIS classification. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient experiencing a flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index after a 36-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We studied 48 cases and 96 controls. The proportion of patients experiencing a flare was significantly higher in the HCQ/CQ withdrawal group as compared to the maintenance group (15 [31.3%] patients versus 12 [12.5%]; OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.2–8.2], <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). Withdrawal of HCQ/CQ was inferior with respect to occurrence of severe SLE flare (12 [25.0%] vs 11 [11.5%]; OR 2.5 [95%CI 0.9–6.9], <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.053) and time to first flare (HR 6.3 [2.0–19.9], <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.005). Elevated serum levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies were identified as a risk factor for SLE flare following HCQ/CQ discontinuation (HR 5.4 [1.5–18.7], <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Bone Spine\",\"volume\":\"91 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 105756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Bone Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X24000678\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Bone Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X24000678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以往的研究已提供证据表明,系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者停用羟氯喹(HCQ)和氯喹(CQ)与疾病复发风险增加有关,但有关停用HCQ/CQ时疾病活动水平的信息却很有限。在此,我们旨在描述缓解期系统性红斑狼疮患者停用 HCQ 或 CQ 后系统性红斑狼疮复发的风险:病例对照研究(1:2):比较因抗疟视网膜病变而停用 HCQ/CQ 后的系统性红斑狼疮患者(病例)与在性别、抗疟治疗持续时间和系统性红斑狼疮诊断时年龄方面匹配的系统性红斑狼疮患者(对照组)的演变情况,后者在整个随访期间继续接受抗疟治疗。根据 DORIS 的分类,患者必须缓解至少一年才能被纳入研究。研究的主要终点是根据SELENA-SLEDAI复发指数对随访36个月后出现复发的患者比例进行评估:我们对 48 例病例和 96 例对照进行了研究。与维持组相比,停用HCQ/CQ组出现复发的患者比例明显更高(15(31.3%)对12(12.5%);OR 3.1 (95%CI 1.2-8.2), p=0.01)。在严重系统性红斑狼疮复发(12(25.0%)对 11(11.5%);OR 2.5(95%CI 0.9-6.9),P=0.053)和首次复发时间(HR 6.3 [2.0-19.9],P=0.053)方面,停用 HCQ/CQ 的效果较差:缓解期系统性红斑狼疮患者停用HCQ或CQ会导致复发风险增加3倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of flare in patients with SLE in remission after hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine withdrawal

Objective

Previous studies have provided evidence that the discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and chloroquine (CQ), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of disease flares, with limited information on the level of disease activity at the time of HCQ/CQ discontinuation. Here we aimed to describe the risk of SLE flare after withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission.

Methods

Case-control study (1:2) comparing the evolution of patients with SLE after HCQ/CQ withdrawal for antimalarial retinopathy (cases) with patients with SLE matched for sex, antimalarial treatment duration and age at SLE diagnosis, whose antimalarial treatment was continued throughout the entire follow-up period (controls). To be included in the study, patients had to be in remission for at least one year according to the DORIS classification. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient experiencing a flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index after a 36-month follow-up.

Results

We studied 48 cases and 96 controls. The proportion of patients experiencing a flare was significantly higher in the HCQ/CQ withdrawal group as compared to the maintenance group (15 [31.3%] patients versus 12 [12.5%]; OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.2–8.2], P = 0.01). Withdrawal of HCQ/CQ was inferior with respect to occurrence of severe SLE flare (12 [25.0%] vs 11 [11.5%]; OR 2.5 [95%CI 0.9–6.9], P = 0.053) and time to first flare (HR 6.3 [2.0–19.9], P < 0.005). Elevated serum levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies were identified as a risk factor for SLE flare following HCQ/CQ discontinuation (HR 5.4 [1.5–18.7], P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Joint Bone Spine
Joint Bone Spine 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Bimonthly e-only international journal, Joint Bone Spine publishes in English original research articles and all the latest advances that deal with disorders affecting the joints, bones, and spine and, more generally, the entire field of rheumatology. All submitted manuscripts to the journal are subjected to rigorous peer review by international experts: under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. (Surgical techniques and work focusing specifically on orthopedic surgery are not within the scope of the journal.)Joint Bone Spine is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey platforms.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with severity and mortality of COVID-19 in French patients with connective tissue diseases and rheumatoid arthritis: a nation-wide, population-based analysis of the French national medico-administrative SNDS database. From a better knowledge of periodontal disease to Porphyromonas gingivalis target for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Lifetime clinical presentation of Still's disease in the Afro-descendant population of the French West Indies. Pleural Irregularities: a new ultrasound marker for lung involvement in primary Sjögren's disease. Extensive Tophaceous Gout with Subcutaneous Deposits in the Buttocks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1