在脊髓损伤步态康复中结合神经调控策略:概念验证、随机、交叉试验。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.011
Kelly McKenzie, Nicole Veit, Shreya Aalla, Chen Yang, Matt Giffhorn, Alec Lynott, Kristine Buchler, Ameen Kishta, Alex Barry, Milap Sandhu, Yaejin Moon, William Zev Rymer, Arun Jayaraman
{"title":"在脊髓损伤步态康复中结合神经调控策略:概念验证、随机、交叉试验。","authors":"Kelly McKenzie, Nicole Veit, Shreya Aalla, Chen Yang, Matt Giffhorn, Alec Lynott, Kristine Buchler, Ameen Kishta, Alex Barry, Milap Sandhu, Yaejin Moon, William Zev Rymer, Arun Jayaraman","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate if acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) coupled with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) enhances task-specific training and leads to superior and more sustained gait improvements as compared with each of these strategies used in isolation in persons with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Proof of concept, randomized crossover trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient, rehabilitation hospital.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ten participants completed 3 intervention arms: (1) AIH, tSCS, and gait training (AIH + tSCS); (2) tSCS plus gait training (SHAM AIH + tSCS); and (3) gait training alone (SHAM + SHAM). Each arm consisted of 5 consecutive days of intervention with a minimum of a 4-week washout between arms. The order of arms was randomized. The study took place from December 3, 2020, to January 4, 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>10-meter walk test at self-selected velocity (SSV) and fast velocity, 6-minute walk test, timed Up and Go (TUG) and secondary outcome measures included isometric ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion torque RESULTS: TUG improvements were 3.44 seconds (95% CI: 1.24-5.65) significantly greater in the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS arm at post-intervention (POST), and 3.31 seconds (95% CI: 1.03-5.58) greater than the SHAM + SHAM arm at 1-week follow up (1WK). SSV was 0.08 m/s (95% CI: 0.02-0.14) significantly greater following the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS at POST. Although not significant, the AIH + tSCS arm also demonstrated the greatest average improvements compared with the other 2 arms at POST and 1WK for the 6-minute walk test, fast velocity, and ankle plantarflexion torque.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study is the first to demonstrate that combining these 3 neuromodulation strategies leads to superior improvements in the TUG and SSV for individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury and warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Neuromodulation Strategies in Spinal Cord Injury Gait Rehabilitation: A Proof of Concept, Randomized, Crossover Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kelly McKenzie, Nicole Veit, Shreya Aalla, Chen Yang, Matt Giffhorn, Alec Lynott, Kristine Buchler, Ameen Kishta, Alex Barry, Milap Sandhu, Yaejin Moon, William Zev Rymer, Arun Jayaraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate if acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) coupled with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) enhances task-specific training and leads to superior and more sustained gait improvements as compared with each of these strategies used in isolation in persons with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Proof of concept, randomized crossover trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient, rehabilitation hospital.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ten participants completed 3 intervention arms: (1) AIH, tSCS, and gait training (AIH + tSCS); (2) tSCS plus gait training (SHAM AIH + tSCS); and (3) gait training alone (SHAM + SHAM). Each arm consisted of 5 consecutive days of intervention with a minimum of a 4-week washout between arms. The order of arms was randomized. The study took place from December 3, 2020, to January 4, 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>10-meter walk test at self-selected velocity (SSV) and fast velocity, 6-minute walk test, timed Up and Go (TUG) and secondary outcome measures included isometric ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion torque RESULTS: TUG improvements were 3.44 seconds (95% CI: 1.24-5.65) significantly greater in the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS arm at post-intervention (POST), and 3.31 seconds (95% CI: 1.03-5.58) greater than the SHAM + SHAM arm at 1-week follow up (1WK). SSV was 0.08 m/s (95% CI: 0.02-0.14) significantly greater following the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS at POST. Although not significant, the AIH + tSCS arm also demonstrated the greatest average improvements compared with the other 2 arms at POST and 1WK for the 6-minute walk test, fast velocity, and ankle plantarflexion torque.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study is the first to demonstrate that combining these 3 neuromodulation strategies leads to superior improvements in the TUG and SSV for individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury and warrants further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估急性间歇性缺氧(AIH)和经皮脊髓刺激(tSCS)是否能增强任务特异性训练,与单独使用这两种策略相比,是否能为慢性、不完全脊髓损伤(SCI)患者带来更好、更持久的步态改善:设计:概念验证、随机交叉试验 设定:门诊康复医院门诊康复医院:10名参与者完成3个干预组:1)AIH、tSCS和步态训练(AIH + tSCS);2)tSCS加步态训练(SHAM AIH + tSCS);3)单独步态训练(SHAM + SHAM)。每组连续干预 5 天,每组之间至少间隔 4 周。两组的顺序是随机的。研究时间为 2020 年 12 月 3 日至 2023 年 1 月 4 日:自选速度(SSV)和快速速度(FV)的 10 米步行测试(10MWT)、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)、定时起立行走(TUG):等长踝关节跖屈和背屈扭矩 结果:干预后(POST),AIH + tSCS 治疗组的 TUG 改善幅度为 3.44 秒(95% CI:1.24-5.65),显著高于 SHAM + AIH + tSCS 治疗组;随访 1 周时,AIH + tSCS 治疗组的 TUG 改善幅度为 3.31 秒(95% CI:1.03-5.58),高于 SHAM + SHAM 治疗组。在干预后,AIH + tSCS 组的 SSV 为 0.08 米/秒(95% CI:0.02-0.14),明显高于 SHAM + AIH + tSCS 组。尽管不具显著性,但与其他两组相比,AIH + tSCS组在6MWT、FV和踝关节跖屈扭力方面的平均改善幅度也最大(POST和1WK):这项试验性研究首次证明,将这三种神经调控策略结合在一起可使慢性不完全性 SCI 患者在 TUG 和 SSV 方面获得更好的改善,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combining Neuromodulation Strategies in Spinal Cord Injury Gait Rehabilitation: A Proof of Concept, Randomized, Crossover Trial.

Objectives: To evaluate if acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) coupled with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) enhances task-specific training and leads to superior and more sustained gait improvements as compared with each of these strategies used in isolation in persons with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury.

Design: Proof of concept, randomized crossover trial.

Setting: Outpatient, rehabilitation hospital.

Interventions: Ten participants completed 3 intervention arms: (1) AIH, tSCS, and gait training (AIH + tSCS); (2) tSCS plus gait training (SHAM AIH + tSCS); and (3) gait training alone (SHAM + SHAM). Each arm consisted of 5 consecutive days of intervention with a minimum of a 4-week washout between arms. The order of arms was randomized. The study took place from December 3, 2020, to January 4, 2023.

Main outcome measures: 10-meter walk test at self-selected velocity (SSV) and fast velocity, 6-minute walk test, timed Up and Go (TUG) and secondary outcome measures included isometric ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion torque RESULTS: TUG improvements were 3.44 seconds (95% CI: 1.24-5.65) significantly greater in the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS arm at post-intervention (POST), and 3.31 seconds (95% CI: 1.03-5.58) greater than the SHAM + SHAM arm at 1-week follow up (1WK). SSV was 0.08 m/s (95% CI: 0.02-0.14) significantly greater following the AIH + tSCS arm than the SHAM AIH + tSCS at POST. Although not significant, the AIH + tSCS arm also demonstrated the greatest average improvements compared with the other 2 arms at POST and 1WK for the 6-minute walk test, fast velocity, and ankle plantarflexion torque.

Conclusions: This pilot study is the first to demonstrate that combining these 3 neuromodulation strategies leads to superior improvements in the TUG and SSV for individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury and warrants further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
What Do I Need to Know About Long COVID-related Breathing Problems? Self-management Programs Within Rehabilitation Yield Positive Health Outcomes at a Small Increased Cost Compared With Usual Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Relations Between Self-reported Prescription Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, and Tramadol Use and Unintentional Injuries Among Those With Spinal Cord Injury. Home-Based Balance Training on Balance and Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Construct Validity and Responsiveness of Performance-based Tests in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1