帕金森病患者丘脑下核局部场电位的稳定性。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Neurobiology of Disease Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106589
Alfonso Fasano , Hideo Mure , Genko Oyama , Nagako Murase , Thomas Witt , Yoshinori Higuchi , Alexa Singer , Claudia Sannelli , Nathan Morelli , on behalf of the DBS PSR Study Group
{"title":"帕金森病患者丘脑下核局部场电位的稳定性。","authors":"Alfonso Fasano ,&nbsp;Hideo Mure ,&nbsp;Genko Oyama ,&nbsp;Nagako Murase ,&nbsp;Thomas Witt ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Higuchi ,&nbsp;Alexa Singer ,&nbsp;Claudia Sannelli ,&nbsp;Nathan Morelli ,&nbsp;on behalf of the DBS PSR Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the large body of work on local field potentials (LFPs), a measure of oscillatory activity in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the longitudinal evolution of LFPs is less explored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine LFP fluctuations collected in clinical settings in patients with PD and STN deep brain stimulation (DBS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-two STN-DBS patients (age: 67.6 ± 8.3 years; 9 females; disease duration: 10.3 ± 4.5 years) completed bilateral LFP recordings over three visits in the OFF-stimulation setting. Peak and band power measures were calculated from each recording.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After bilateral LFP recordings, at least one peak was detected in 18 (81.8%), 20 (90.9%), and 22 (100%) patients at visit 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No significant differences were seen in primary peak amplitude (F = 2.91, <em>p</em> = 0.060) over time. Amplitude of the second largest peak (F = 5.49, <em>p</em> = 0.006) and low-beta (F = 6.89, <em>p</em> = 0.002), high-beta (F = 13.23, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and gamma (F = 12.71, p &lt; 0.001) band power demonstrated a significant effect of time. Post hoc comparisons determined low-beta power (Visit 1–Visit 2: <em>t</em> = 3.59, p = 0.002; Visit 1–Visit 3: <em>t</em> = 2.61, <em>p</em> = 0.031), high-beta (Visit 1–Visit 2: <em>t</em> = 4.64, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; Visit 1–Visit 3: <em>t</em> = 4.23, p &lt; 0.001) and gamma band power (Visit 1–Visit 2: <em>t</em> = 4.65, p &lt; 0.001; Visit 1–Visit 3: <em>t</em> = 4.00, p &lt; 0.001) were significantly increased from visit 1 recordings to both follow-up visits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results provide substantial evidence that LFP can reliably be detected across multiple real-world clinical visits in patients with STN-DBS for PD. Moreover, it provides insights on the evolution of these LFPs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19097,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612400189X/pdfft?md5=f6441d8c4ac9f4cbe01e28af003ab8e7&pid=1-s2.0-S096999612400189X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subthalamic nucleus local field potential stability in patients with Parkinson's disease\",\"authors\":\"Alfonso Fasano ,&nbsp;Hideo Mure ,&nbsp;Genko Oyama ,&nbsp;Nagako Murase ,&nbsp;Thomas Witt ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Higuchi ,&nbsp;Alexa Singer ,&nbsp;Claudia Sannelli ,&nbsp;Nathan Morelli ,&nbsp;on behalf of the DBS PSR Study Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the large body of work on local field potentials (LFPs), a measure of oscillatory activity in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the longitudinal evolution of LFPs is less explored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine LFP fluctuations collected in clinical settings in patients with PD and STN deep brain stimulation (DBS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-two STN-DBS patients (age: 67.6 ± 8.3 years; 9 females; disease duration: 10.3 ± 4.5 years) completed bilateral LFP recordings over three visits in the OFF-stimulation setting. Peak and band power measures were calculated from each recording.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After bilateral LFP recordings, at least one peak was detected in 18 (81.8%), 20 (90.9%), and 22 (100%) patients at visit 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No significant differences were seen in primary peak amplitude (F = 2.91, <em>p</em> = 0.060) over time. Amplitude of the second largest peak (F = 5.49, <em>p</em> = 0.006) and low-beta (F = 6.89, <em>p</em> = 0.002), high-beta (F = 13.23, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and gamma (F = 12.71, p &lt; 0.001) band power demonstrated a significant effect of time. Post hoc comparisons determined low-beta power (Visit 1–Visit 2: <em>t</em> = 3.59, p = 0.002; Visit 1–Visit 3: <em>t</em> = 2.61, <em>p</em> = 0.031), high-beta (Visit 1–Visit 2: <em>t</em> = 4.64, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; Visit 1–Visit 3: <em>t</em> = 4.23, p &lt; 0.001) and gamma band power (Visit 1–Visit 2: <em>t</em> = 4.65, p &lt; 0.001; Visit 1–Visit 3: <em>t</em> = 4.00, p &lt; 0.001) were significantly increased from visit 1 recordings to both follow-up visits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results provide substantial evidence that LFP can reliably be detected across multiple real-world clinical visits in patients with STN-DBS for PD. Moreover, it provides insights on the evolution of these LFPs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobiology of Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612400189X/pdfft?md5=f6441d8c4ac9f4cbe01e28af003ab8e7&pid=1-s2.0-S096999612400189X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobiology of Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612400189X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612400189X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部场电位(LFPs)是帕金森病(PD)患者振荡活动的测量指标,尽管有大量关于局部场电位(LFPs)的研究,但对LFPs纵向演变的探讨却较少:确定在临床环境中收集的帕金森病患者和 STN 深部脑刺激(DBS)患者的 LFP 波动:22名STN-DBS患者(年龄:67.6 ± 8.3岁;9名女性;病程:10.3 ± 4.5年)在关闭刺激环境下完成了三次双侧LFP记录。根据每次记录计算峰值和频带功率:双侧 LFP 记录后,在第 1、2 和 3 次就诊时,分别有 18 名(81.8%)、20 名(90.9%)和 22 名(100%)患者检测到至少一个峰值。主峰振幅(F = 2.91,P = 0.060)随时间变化无明显差异。第二大峰值的振幅(F = 5.49,p = 0.006)和低-β(F = 6.89,p = 0.002)、高-β(F = 13.23,p 结论:我们的研究结果提供了大量证据,证明 LFP 在不同时间段的振幅存在显著差异:我们的研究结果提供了大量证据,证明LFP可在STN-DBS治疗帕金森病患者的多次实际临床就诊中被可靠地检测到。此外,我们还深入了解了这些 LFPs 的演变过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subthalamic nucleus local field potential stability in patients with Parkinson's disease

Background

Despite the large body of work on local field potentials (LFPs), a measure of oscillatory activity in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the longitudinal evolution of LFPs is less explored.

Objective

To determine LFP fluctuations collected in clinical settings in patients with PD and STN deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Methods

Twenty-two STN-DBS patients (age: 67.6 ± 8.3 years; 9 females; disease duration: 10.3 ± 4.5 years) completed bilateral LFP recordings over three visits in the OFF-stimulation setting. Peak and band power measures were calculated from each recording.

Results

After bilateral LFP recordings, at least one peak was detected in 18 (81.8%), 20 (90.9%), and 22 (100%) patients at visit 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No significant differences were seen in primary peak amplitude (F = 2.91, p = 0.060) over time. Amplitude of the second largest peak (F = 5.49, p = 0.006) and low-beta (F = 6.89, p = 0.002), high-beta (F = 13.23, p < 0.001), and gamma (F = 12.71, p < 0.001) band power demonstrated a significant effect of time. Post hoc comparisons determined low-beta power (Visit 1–Visit 2: t = 3.59, p = 0.002; Visit 1–Visit 3: t = 2.61, p = 0.031), high-beta (Visit 1–Visit 2: t = 4.64, p < 0.001; Visit 1–Visit 3: t = 4.23, p < 0.001) and gamma band power (Visit 1–Visit 2: t = 4.65, p < 0.001; Visit 1–Visit 3: t = 4.00, p < 0.001) were significantly increased from visit 1 recordings to both follow-up visits.

Conclusion

Our results provide substantial evidence that LFP can reliably be detected across multiple real-world clinical visits in patients with STN-DBS for PD. Moreover, it provides insights on the evolution of these LFPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Disease
Neurobiology of Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
270
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Disease is a major international journal at the interface between basic and clinical neuroscience. The journal provides a forum for the publication of top quality research papers on: molecular and cellular definitions of disease mechanisms, the neural systems and underpinning behavioral disorders, the genetics of inherited neurological and psychiatric diseases, nervous system aging, and findings relevant to the development of new therapies.
期刊最新文献
Low-beta versus high-beta band cortico-subcortical coherence in movement inhibition and expectation. TNFα prevents FGF4-mediated rescue of astrocyte dysfunction and reactivity in human ALS models. Legumain/asparaginyl endopeptidase-resistant tau fibril fold produces corticobasal degeneration-specific C-terminal tau fragment. Striatal cholinergic transmission in an inducible transgenic mouse model of paroxysmal non-kinesiogenic dyskinesia. Direct conversion of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into dopaminergic neurons for Parkinson's disease treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1