粘连性囊炎的超声波水滞留:医院康复与家庭康复的比较

IF 1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Egyptian Rheumatologist Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ejr.2024.06.003
Danilo Donati , Roberto Tedeschi , Paolo Spinnato , Davide Pederiva , Federico Pilla , Cesare Faldini , Maria Grazia Benedetti , Enrico Guerra , Marco Cavallo , Marco Miceli , Stefano Galletti , Fabio Vita
{"title":"粘连性囊炎的超声波水滞留:医院康复与家庭康复的比较","authors":"Danilo Donati ,&nbsp;Roberto Tedeschi ,&nbsp;Paolo Spinnato ,&nbsp;Davide Pederiva ,&nbsp;Federico Pilla ,&nbsp;Cesare Faldini ,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Benedetti ,&nbsp;Enrico Guerra ,&nbsp;Marco Cavallo ,&nbsp;Marco Miceli ,&nbsp;Stefano Galletti ,&nbsp;Fabio Vita","doi":"10.1016/j.ejr.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder, causes pain and reduces glenohumeral joint motion.</p></div><div><h3>Aim of the work</h3><p>This study aims to assesses ultrasound-guided hydrodistention with rehabilitation in hospital versus home settings.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Forty patients with adhesive capsulitis were split into two groups: one received hydrodistention with hospital-assisted rehabilitation, and the other with home-based rehabilitation, following the same exercise protocol. Clinical assessments included range of motion (ROM), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), and assessment shoulder and elbow scale (ASES)</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The hospital-based group showed more rapid and substantial improvements in ROM and NPRS scores compared to the home-based group. The hospital-based group had a mean flexion ROM of 104.3 ± 31.6°, which increased to 149.5 ± 20.6° at the final follow-up. The home-based group started with a mean flexion ROM of 103.3 ± 29.2°, improving to 161.3 ± 23.2° by the end of the study. Both groups showed significant improvements, with the home-based group slightly outperforming in flexion ROM by the third follow-up. Initial NPRS scores were 4.7 ± 1.92 for the hospital-based group and 6.6 ± 1.63 for the home-based group. By the six-month mark, the hospital-based group’s SPADI score dropped to 17.4 ± 19.5, while the home-based group’s score was 10.5 ± 13.03. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements, with the hospital-based group showing slightly better outcomes at various follow-ups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Hydrodistention combined with supervised rehabilitation is optimal for treating frozen shoulder, though home-based therapy is also effective. Both methods significantly benefit from hydrodistention, highlighting its importance in treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46152,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Rheumatologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116424000759/pdfft?md5=045611f9515672ed3bf1755c574098eb&pid=1-s2.0-S1110116424000759-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasoundhydrodistention in adhesivecapsulitis: Hospital versus home-based rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Donati ,&nbsp;Roberto Tedeschi ,&nbsp;Paolo Spinnato ,&nbsp;Davide Pederiva ,&nbsp;Federico Pilla ,&nbsp;Cesare Faldini ,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Benedetti ,&nbsp;Enrico Guerra ,&nbsp;Marco Cavallo ,&nbsp;Marco Miceli ,&nbsp;Stefano Galletti ,&nbsp;Fabio Vita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejr.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder, causes pain and reduces glenohumeral joint motion.</p></div><div><h3>Aim of the work</h3><p>This study aims to assesses ultrasound-guided hydrodistention with rehabilitation in hospital versus home settings.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Forty patients with adhesive capsulitis were split into two groups: one received hydrodistention with hospital-assisted rehabilitation, and the other with home-based rehabilitation, following the same exercise protocol. Clinical assessments included range of motion (ROM), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), and assessment shoulder and elbow scale (ASES)</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The hospital-based group showed more rapid and substantial improvements in ROM and NPRS scores compared to the home-based group. The hospital-based group had a mean flexion ROM of 104.3 ± 31.6°, which increased to 149.5 ± 20.6° at the final follow-up. The home-based group started with a mean flexion ROM of 103.3 ± 29.2°, improving to 161.3 ± 23.2° by the end of the study. Both groups showed significant improvements, with the home-based group slightly outperforming in flexion ROM by the third follow-up. Initial NPRS scores were 4.7 ± 1.92 for the hospital-based group and 6.6 ± 1.63 for the home-based group. By the six-month mark, the hospital-based group’s SPADI score dropped to 17.4 ± 19.5, while the home-based group’s score was 10.5 ± 13.03. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements, with the hospital-based group showing slightly better outcomes at various follow-ups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Hydrodistention combined with supervised rehabilitation is optimal for treating frozen shoulder, though home-based therapy is also effective. Both methods significantly benefit from hydrodistention, highlighting its importance in treatment strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Rheumatologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116424000759/pdfft?md5=045611f9515672ed3bf1755c574098eb&pid=1-s2.0-S1110116424000759-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Rheumatologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116424000759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Rheumatologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116424000759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景粘连性肩关节囊炎(或称肩周炎)会导致疼痛并减少盂肱关节的活动。患者和方法40名粘连性肩关节囊炎患者被分为两组:一组在医院辅助下接受水压阻滞康复治疗,另一组在家庭康复治疗基础上接受相同的锻炼方案。临床评估包括活动范围(ROM)、数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)、手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)以及肩肘评估量表(ASES)。医院治疗组的平均屈曲 ROM 为 104.3 ± 31.6°,最后随访时增至 149.5 ± 20.6°。居家治疗组开始时的平均屈曲 ROM 为 103.3 ± 29.2°,研究结束时提高到 161.3 ± 23.2°。两组均有明显改善,在第三次随访时,居家治疗组的屈曲活动度略胜一筹。医院治疗组的初始 NPRS 得分为 4.7 ± 1.92,居家治疗组的初始 NPRS 得分为 6.6 ± 1.63。六个月后,住院组的 SPADI 分数降至 17.4 ± 19.5,而居家组的分数为 10.5 ± 13.03。结论水力阻滞结合督导康复治疗是治疗肩周炎的最佳方法,尽管家庭治疗也很有效。两种方法都能明显受益于水力阻滞,突出了其在治疗策略中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasoundhydrodistention in adhesivecapsulitis: Hospital versus home-based rehabilitation

Background

Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder, causes pain and reduces glenohumeral joint motion.

Aim of the work

This study aims to assesses ultrasound-guided hydrodistention with rehabilitation in hospital versus home settings.

Patients and methods

Forty patients with adhesive capsulitis were split into two groups: one received hydrodistention with hospital-assisted rehabilitation, and the other with home-based rehabilitation, following the same exercise protocol. Clinical assessments included range of motion (ROM), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), and assessment shoulder and elbow scale (ASES)

Results

The hospital-based group showed more rapid and substantial improvements in ROM and NPRS scores compared to the home-based group. The hospital-based group had a mean flexion ROM of 104.3 ± 31.6°, which increased to 149.5 ± 20.6° at the final follow-up. The home-based group started with a mean flexion ROM of 103.3 ± 29.2°, improving to 161.3 ± 23.2° by the end of the study. Both groups showed significant improvements, with the home-based group slightly outperforming in flexion ROM by the third follow-up. Initial NPRS scores were 4.7 ± 1.92 for the hospital-based group and 6.6 ± 1.63 for the home-based group. By the six-month mark, the hospital-based group’s SPADI score dropped to 17.4 ± 19.5, while the home-based group’s score was 10.5 ± 13.03. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements, with the hospital-based group showing slightly better outcomes at various follow-ups.

Conclusion

Hydrodistention combined with supervised rehabilitation is optimal for treating frozen shoulder, though home-based therapy is also effective. Both methods significantly benefit from hydrodistention, highlighting its importance in treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Rheumatologist
Egyptian Rheumatologist RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
22.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Procalcitonin level in systemic lupus erythematosus patients and its relation to disease activity and infection Evaluation of functional measures and laboratory parameters to portend limitations of spinal mobility in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis Clinical signficance of human leucocytic antigen (HLA-B27) in patients with early and late-onset axial spondyloarthritis Cardiovascular risk assessment in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis Characteristics of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1