添加石墨烯的水泥生产环境评估

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100206
Raphael Ricardo Zepon Tarpani , Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo , Meini Su , Patrick Manu , Clara Man Cheung , Michael Watson , Paul Ladislaus , Alejandro Gallego-Schmid
{"title":"添加石墨烯的水泥生产环境评估","authors":"Raphael Ricardo Zepon Tarpani ,&nbsp;Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo ,&nbsp;Meini Su ,&nbsp;Patrick Manu ,&nbsp;Clara Man Cheung ,&nbsp;Michael Watson ,&nbsp;Paul Ladislaus ,&nbsp;Alejandro Gallego-Schmid","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cement production significantly contributes to climate change, necessitating alternatives to mitigate the environmental impacts of this essential construction material. This study evaluates 18 environmental impacts of producing Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Graphene (Gr) using life cycle assessment (LCA). Additionally, we explore whether mixing OPC and Gr can lower the life cycle environmental impacts of the final product (OPC<sub>Gr</sub>). Our results show that OPC production in the United Kingdom generates 775 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t, 57% only from geogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Gr production via electrochemical exfoliation in Australia results in 121,000–143,000 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t, primarily due to electricity generation. Using hydro and nuclear power (e.g., in Brazil and France) can sharply reduce these impacts (global warming potential in the range of 11,000–35,000 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t). Adding 0.02 wt% of Gr in powder form (Gr<sub>powder</sub>) from Australia to the OPC and assuming a 16.5% reduction in its usage due to increased strength, results in 674 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t OPC<sub>Gr</sub> (a 13% reduction). However, some impact categories like marine eutrophication and freshwater ecotoxicity potentials increase sharply (&gt;28%). Using Gr<sub>powder</sub> from Brazil and France further reduces the OPC<sub>Gr</sub> global warming potential and the overall environmental footprint.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100206"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000448/pdfft?md5=d3736f5749c39a391cf945eeafe0259b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000448-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental assessment of cement production with added graphene\",\"authors\":\"Raphael Ricardo Zepon Tarpani ,&nbsp;Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo ,&nbsp;Meini Su ,&nbsp;Patrick Manu ,&nbsp;Clara Man Cheung ,&nbsp;Michael Watson ,&nbsp;Paul Ladislaus ,&nbsp;Alejandro Gallego-Schmid\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cement production significantly contributes to climate change, necessitating alternatives to mitigate the environmental impacts of this essential construction material. This study evaluates 18 environmental impacts of producing Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Graphene (Gr) using life cycle assessment (LCA). Additionally, we explore whether mixing OPC and Gr can lower the life cycle environmental impacts of the final product (OPC<sub>Gr</sub>). Our results show that OPC production in the United Kingdom generates 775 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t, 57% only from geogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Gr production via electrochemical exfoliation in Australia results in 121,000–143,000 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t, primarily due to electricity generation. Using hydro and nuclear power (e.g., in Brazil and France) can sharply reduce these impacts (global warming potential in the range of 11,000–35,000 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t). Adding 0.02 wt% of Gr in powder form (Gr<sub>powder</sub>) from Australia to the OPC and assuming a 16.5% reduction in its usage due to increased strength, results in 674 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq./t OPC<sub>Gr</sub> (a 13% reduction). However, some impact categories like marine eutrophication and freshwater ecotoxicity potentials increase sharply (&gt;28%). Using Gr<sub>powder</sub> from Brazil and France further reduces the OPC<sub>Gr</sub> global warming potential and the overall environmental footprint.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000448/pdfft?md5=d3736f5749c39a391cf945eeafe0259b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000448-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水泥生产极大地加剧了气候变化,因此有必要采用替代品来减轻这种重要建筑材料对环境的影响。本研究利用生命周期评估(LCA)评估了生产普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)和石墨烯(Gr)对环境的 18 种影响。此外,我们还探讨了混合 OPC 和 Gr 能否降低最终产品(OPCGr)的生命周期环境影响。我们的研究结果表明,英国的 OPC 生产会产生 775 千克二氧化碳当量/吨,其中 57% 来自地源二氧化碳排放。在澳大利亚,通过电化学剥离法生产 Gr 会产生 121,000-143,000 kg CO2 eq./t,主要来自发电。使用水力和核能(例如在巴西和法国)可大幅减少这些影响(全球升温潜能值在 11,000-35,000 千克二氧化碳当量/吨之间)。在 OPC 中添加 0.02 wt% 的澳大利亚粉末状 Gr(Grpowder),并假设其使用量因强度增加而减少 16.5%,则 OPCGr 的二氧化碳当量为 674 千克/吨(减少 13%)。然而,某些影响类别,如海洋富营养化和淡水生态毒性潜力则急剧增加(28%)。使用来自巴西和法国的 Grpowder 进一步降低了 OPCGr 的全球升温潜能值和整体环境足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental assessment of cement production with added graphene

Cement production significantly contributes to climate change, necessitating alternatives to mitigate the environmental impacts of this essential construction material. This study evaluates 18 environmental impacts of producing Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Graphene (Gr) using life cycle assessment (LCA). Additionally, we explore whether mixing OPC and Gr can lower the life cycle environmental impacts of the final product (OPCGr). Our results show that OPC production in the United Kingdom generates 775 kg CO2 eq./t, 57% only from geogenic CO2 emissions. Gr production via electrochemical exfoliation in Australia results in 121,000–143,000 kg CO2 eq./t, primarily due to electricity generation. Using hydro and nuclear power (e.g., in Brazil and France) can sharply reduce these impacts (global warming potential in the range of 11,000–35,000 kg CO2 eq./t). Adding 0.02 wt% of Gr in powder form (Grpowder) from Australia to the OPC and assuming a 16.5% reduction in its usage due to increased strength, results in 674 kg CO2 eq./t OPCGr (a 13% reduction). However, some impact categories like marine eutrophication and freshwater ecotoxicity potentials increase sharply (>28%). Using Grpowder from Brazil and France further reduces the OPCGr global warming potential and the overall environmental footprint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Life cycle assessment of a point absorber wave energy converter A systematic review of the SAFA framework in the literature: An approach to assess sustainability in agri-food systems Implications of environmental constraints and opportunities on livestock production and emissions: New Zealand as a case study Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review Gate-to-gate life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling pre-treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1