248 名接受放射治疗的 I-III 期食道癌患者在单个机构队列中的疗效:年轻患者与老年患者的比较

Carrie Lavergne , Andrew Youssef , Mark Niglas , Deanna Ng Humphreys , Youssef Youssef
{"title":"248 名接受放射治疗的 I-III 期食道癌患者在单个机构队列中的疗效:年轻患者与老年患者的比较","authors":"Carrie Lavergne ,&nbsp;Andrew Youssef ,&nbsp;Mark Niglas ,&nbsp;Deanna Ng Humphreys ,&nbsp;Youssef Youssef","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Outcomes for patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for non-metastatic esophageal cancer at a single institution were assessed, as well as the impact of factors including age and intensity modulated RT (IMRT) planning on patient outcomes. A retrospective cohort of patients treated with RT for stage I-III esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2018 was identified. Among 248 identified patients, 28 % identified as older (≥75 years of age). Other than histology, there were no other statistically significant differences in patient and tumour characteristics between the younger and older populations. Treatments varied between the two age groups, with significantly less older patients completing trimodality treatments (17 % vs 58 %). Median overall survival (M−OS) and progression-free survival (M−PFS) were 20 months and 12 months for all patients and 40 months and 26 months for trimodality patients, respectively. In the older patients, the M−OS improved from 13 months for all to 34 months for trimodality patients; and M−PFS from 10 months to 16 months. On multivariate analysis, the use of trimodality therapy showed improved OS (HR 0.26, p &lt; 0.001). In the non-surgical older patient group, significantly better survival was seen in patients who had a heart V30Gy under 46 %. There was no significant difference in M−OS in patients planned with IMRT compared with 3D-conformal RT. Clinical outcomes in the treatment of esophageal cancer vary significantly by treatment approach, with the most favourable results in those receiving trimodality therapy. Among older patients deemed fit after assessment by the multidisciplinary team for trimodality treatments, the M−OS is comparable to the younger patient group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000271/pdfft?md5=eedee8626a9fac65e4201441e0bb1471&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000271-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes from a single institution cohort of 248 patients with stage I–III esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: Comparison of younger and older populations\",\"authors\":\"Carrie Lavergne ,&nbsp;Andrew Youssef ,&nbsp;Mark Niglas ,&nbsp;Deanna Ng Humphreys ,&nbsp;Youssef Youssef\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Outcomes for patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for non-metastatic esophageal cancer at a single institution were assessed, as well as the impact of factors including age and intensity modulated RT (IMRT) planning on patient outcomes. A retrospective cohort of patients treated with RT for stage I-III esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2018 was identified. Among 248 identified patients, 28 % identified as older (≥75 years of age). Other than histology, there were no other statistically significant differences in patient and tumour characteristics between the younger and older populations. Treatments varied between the two age groups, with significantly less older patients completing trimodality treatments (17 % vs 58 %). Median overall survival (M−OS) and progression-free survival (M−PFS) were 20 months and 12 months for all patients and 40 months and 26 months for trimodality patients, respectively. In the older patients, the M−OS improved from 13 months for all to 34 months for trimodality patients; and M−PFS from 10 months to 16 months. On multivariate analysis, the use of trimodality therapy showed improved OS (HR 0.26, p &lt; 0.001). In the non-surgical older patient group, significantly better survival was seen in patients who had a heart V30Gy under 46 %. There was no significant difference in M−OS in patients planned with IMRT compared with 3D-conformal RT. Clinical outcomes in the treatment of esophageal cancer vary significantly by treatment approach, with the most favourable results in those receiving trimodality therapy. Among older patients deemed fit after assessment by the multidisciplinary team for trimodality treatments, the M−OS is comparable to the younger patient group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000271/pdfft?md5=eedee8626a9fac65e4201441e0bb1471&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000271-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员评估了在一家机构接受放疗(RT)治疗非转移性食管癌患者的疗效,以及年龄和调强RT(IMRT)计划等因素对患者疗效的影响。研究人员对2010年至2018年间接受RT治疗的I-III期食管癌患者进行了回顾性队列鉴定。在248名已确认的患者中,28%的患者年龄较大(≥75岁)。除组织学特征外,年轻群体和老年群体的患者和肿瘤特征在统计学上没有其他显著差异。两个年龄组之间的治疗方法各不相同,老年患者完成三模式治疗的比例明显较低(17% 对 58%)。所有患者的中位总生存期(M-OS)和无进展生存期(M-PFS)分别为20个月和12个月,三模式患者的中位总生存期(M-OS)和无进展生存期(M-PFS)分别为40个月和26个月。在年龄较大的患者中,所有患者的中位总生存期(M-OS)从13个月提高到34个月;三体患者的中位无进展生存期(M-PFS)从10个月提高到16个月。多变量分析显示,使用三联疗法可改善 OS(HR 0.26,p < 0.001)。在非手术老年患者组中,心脏 V30Gy 低于 46% 的患者生存率明显更高。与三维适形 RT 相比,计划使用 IMRT 的患者的 M-OS 没有明显差异。食管癌的临床治疗效果因治疗方法的不同而有很大差异,其中接受三模式治疗的患者效果最好。在经多学科团队评估后认为适合接受三模式治疗的老年患者中,M-OS与年轻患者组相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes from a single institution cohort of 248 patients with stage I–III esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: Comparison of younger and older populations

Outcomes for patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for non-metastatic esophageal cancer at a single institution were assessed, as well as the impact of factors including age and intensity modulated RT (IMRT) planning on patient outcomes. A retrospective cohort of patients treated with RT for stage I-III esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2018 was identified. Among 248 identified patients, 28 % identified as older (≥75 years of age). Other than histology, there were no other statistically significant differences in patient and tumour characteristics between the younger and older populations. Treatments varied between the two age groups, with significantly less older patients completing trimodality treatments (17 % vs 58 %). Median overall survival (M−OS) and progression-free survival (M−PFS) were 20 months and 12 months for all patients and 40 months and 26 months for trimodality patients, respectively. In the older patients, the M−OS improved from 13 months for all to 34 months for trimodality patients; and M−PFS from 10 months to 16 months. On multivariate analysis, the use of trimodality therapy showed improved OS (HR 0.26, p < 0.001). In the non-surgical older patient group, significantly better survival was seen in patients who had a heart V30Gy under 46 %. There was no significant difference in M−OS in patients planned with IMRT compared with 3D-conformal RT. Clinical outcomes in the treatment of esophageal cancer vary significantly by treatment approach, with the most favourable results in those receiving trimodality therapy. Among older patients deemed fit after assessment by the multidisciplinary team for trimodality treatments, the M−OS is comparable to the younger patient group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Dealing with rectum motion during radiotherapy: How can we anticipate it? Assessment of usage, reuse and disposal of thermoplastic masks among radiotherapy technologists in India: A nationwide perspective Socioeconomic disadvantage and its impact on patient satisfaction at a multi-site radiation oncology center Symptom experience and symptom distress in patients with malignant brain tumor treated with proton therapy: A five-year follow-up study Comparing the effects of warm footbath and foot reflexology on depression of patients undergoing radiotherapy: A randomized clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1