选择积极监控还是手术治疗低风险 DCIS 的妇女对 DCIS 的了解。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2024.103764
E.G. Engelhardt , R.S.J.M. Schmitz , M.A. Gerritsma , C.M.T. Sondermeijer , E. Verschuur , J.H.E. Houtzager , R. Griffioen , N. Bijker , R.M. Mann , V. Retèl , F.H. van Duijnhoven , J. Wesseling , E.M.A. Bleiker
{"title":"选择积极监控还是手术治疗低风险 DCIS 的妇女对 DCIS 的了解。","authors":"E.G. Engelhardt ,&nbsp;R.S.J.M. Schmitz ,&nbsp;M.A. Gerritsma ,&nbsp;C.M.T. Sondermeijer ,&nbsp;E. Verschuur ,&nbsp;J.H.E. Houtzager ,&nbsp;R. Griffioen ,&nbsp;N. Bijker ,&nbsp;R.M. Mann ,&nbsp;V. Retèl ,&nbsp;F.H. van Duijnhoven ,&nbsp;J. Wesseling ,&nbsp;E.M.A. Bleiker","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but often never will. As we cannot predict accurately which DCIS-lesions will or will not progress to IBC, almost all women with DCIS undergo breast-conserving surgery supplemented with radiotherapy, or even mastectomy. In some countries, endocrine treatment is prescribed as well. This implies many women with non-progressive DCIS undergo overtreatment. To reduce this, the LORD patient preference trial (LORD-PPT) tests whether mammographic active surveillance (AS) is safe by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between treatment and AS. For this, sufficient knowledge about DCIS is crucial. Therefore, we assessed women's DCIS knowledge in association with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>LORD-PPT participants (N = 376) completed a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, risk perception, treatment choice and DCIS knowledge after being informed about their diagnosis and treatment options.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>66 % of participants had poor knowledge (i.e., answered ≤3 out of 7 knowledge items correctly). Most incorrect answers involved overestimating the safety of AS and misunderstanding of DCIS prognostic risks. Overall, women with higher DCIS knowledge score perceived their risk of developing IBC as being somewhat higher than women with poorer knowledge (p = 0.049). Women with better DCIS knowledge more often chose surgery whilst most women with poorer knowledge chose active surveillance (p = 0.049).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our findings show that there is room for improvement of information provision to patients. Decision support tools for patients and clinicians could help to stimulate effective shared decision-making about DCIS management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 103764"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400095X/pdfft?md5=73c465742c1edf92fe80254d590dc8ad&pid=1-s2.0-S096097762400095X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DCIS knowledge of women choosing between active surveillance and surgery for low-risk DCIS\",\"authors\":\"E.G. Engelhardt ,&nbsp;R.S.J.M. Schmitz ,&nbsp;M.A. Gerritsma ,&nbsp;C.M.T. Sondermeijer ,&nbsp;E. Verschuur ,&nbsp;J.H.E. Houtzager ,&nbsp;R. Griffioen ,&nbsp;N. Bijker ,&nbsp;R.M. Mann ,&nbsp;V. Retèl ,&nbsp;F.H. van Duijnhoven ,&nbsp;J. Wesseling ,&nbsp;E.M.A. Bleiker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but often never will. As we cannot predict accurately which DCIS-lesions will or will not progress to IBC, almost all women with DCIS undergo breast-conserving surgery supplemented with radiotherapy, or even mastectomy. In some countries, endocrine treatment is prescribed as well. This implies many women with non-progressive DCIS undergo overtreatment. To reduce this, the LORD patient preference trial (LORD-PPT) tests whether mammographic active surveillance (AS) is safe by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between treatment and AS. For this, sufficient knowledge about DCIS is crucial. Therefore, we assessed women's DCIS knowledge in association with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>LORD-PPT participants (N = 376) completed a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, risk perception, treatment choice and DCIS knowledge after being informed about their diagnosis and treatment options.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>66 % of participants had poor knowledge (i.e., answered ≤3 out of 7 knowledge items correctly). Most incorrect answers involved overestimating the safety of AS and misunderstanding of DCIS prognostic risks. Overall, women with higher DCIS knowledge score perceived their risk of developing IBC as being somewhat higher than women with poorer knowledge (p = 0.049). Women with better DCIS knowledge more often chose surgery whilst most women with poorer knowledge chose active surveillance (p = 0.049).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our findings show that there is room for improvement of information provision to patients. Decision support tools for patients and clinicians could help to stimulate effective shared decision-making about DCIS management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400095X/pdfft?md5=73c465742c1edf92fe80254d590dc8ad&pid=1-s2.0-S096097762400095X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400095X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762400095X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)可发展为浸润性乳腺癌(IBC),但通常不会发展为 IBC。由于我们无法准确预测哪些 DCIS 病变会或不会发展成 IBC,几乎所有患有 DCIS 的妇女都要接受保乳手术,辅以放疗,甚至乳房切除术。在一些国家,还需要接受内分泌治疗。这意味着许多患有非进展性 DCIS 的妇女接受了过度治疗。为了减少这种情况,洛德患者偏好试验(LORD-PPT)通过让低风险 DCIS 妇女在治疗和主动监测之间做出选择,来检验乳腺造影主动监测(AS)是否安全。为此,充分了解 DCIS 至关重要。因此,我们评估了妇女对DCIS的了解程度与社会人口学和临床特征的关系:LORD-PPT 参与者(N = 376)填写了一份问卷,评估社会人口学和临床特征、风险认知、治疗选择以及在获知诊断和治疗方案后对 DCIS 的了解程度:66% 的参与者知识欠缺(即在 7 个知识项目中回答正确的项目少于 3 个)。大多数错误答案涉及高估 AS 的安全性和误解 DCIS 的预后风险。总体而言,DCIS 知识得分较高的妇女认为其罹患 IBC 的风险略高于知识较差的妇女(p = 0.049)。对DCIS了解较多的妇女更倾向于选择手术治疗,而对DCIS了解较少的妇女大多选择积极监测(p = 0.049):讨论:我们的研究结果表明,在向患者提供信息方面仍有改进的余地。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,为患者提供的信息仍有改进的余地。为患者和临床医生提供的决策支持工具有助于促进就 DCIS 的治疗做出有效的共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DCIS knowledge of women choosing between active surveillance and surgery for low-risk DCIS

Background

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but often never will. As we cannot predict accurately which DCIS-lesions will or will not progress to IBC, almost all women with DCIS undergo breast-conserving surgery supplemented with radiotherapy, or even mastectomy. In some countries, endocrine treatment is prescribed as well. This implies many women with non-progressive DCIS undergo overtreatment. To reduce this, the LORD patient preference trial (LORD-PPT) tests whether mammographic active surveillance (AS) is safe by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between treatment and AS. For this, sufficient knowledge about DCIS is crucial. Therefore, we assessed women's DCIS knowledge in association with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods

LORD-PPT participants (N = 376) completed a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, risk perception, treatment choice and DCIS knowledge after being informed about their diagnosis and treatment options.

Results

66 % of participants had poor knowledge (i.e., answered ≤3 out of 7 knowledge items correctly). Most incorrect answers involved overestimating the safety of AS and misunderstanding of DCIS prognostic risks. Overall, women with higher DCIS knowledge score perceived their risk of developing IBC as being somewhat higher than women with poorer knowledge (p = 0.049). Women with better DCIS knowledge more often chose surgery whilst most women with poorer knowledge chose active surveillance (p = 0.049).

Discussion

Our findings show that there is room for improvement of information provision to patients. Decision support tools for patients and clinicians could help to stimulate effective shared decision-making about DCIS management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
期刊最新文献
Inequality in breast cancer: Global statistics from 2022 to 2050 A patient-led survey on information and communication needs of patients with metastatic breast cancer in Ireland and Northern Ireland (CTRIAL-IE 23–05) Editorial Board Factors associated with breast lymphedema after adjuvant radiation therapy in women undergoing breast conservation therapy Treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer: The role of patient selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1