探索数字健康工具对患者与社区药剂师互动的影响:一项试点随机对照研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.011
{"title":"探索数字健康工具对患者与社区药剂师互动的影响:一项试点随机对照研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of digital Patient- Reported Outcomes (PRO) tools has been shown to enhance the exchange of information and shared decision-making in medical encounters. However, their influence on patient-pharmacist interactions has not yet been explored.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to examine the impact of RxTalk™, a digital PRO tool, in supporting the communication between patients and pharmacists compared to usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><em>Intervention</em><strong>:</strong><span> RxTalk™ was developed to collect information about medication adherence and beliefs, using a tablet computer.</span></p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted at a community pharmacy in Wisconsin, USA. Sixty patients were randomized to either the intervention group who used RxTalk™ during medication pick-up or the control group who did not use the tool. Patients who used RxTalk™ received paper copies of their responses which were also shared with pharmacists. The consultation was audio-recorded for both groups and coded using the Active Patient Participation Coding scale. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted with both groups within one week of enrollment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patient tapes were analyzed. In the unadjusted model, patients in the intervention group had a higher active participation rate (<em>p</em> = 0.004) and raised significantly more concerns during consultations (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) compared to the control group. Pharmacists asked twice as many questions while counseling patients in the intervention group compared to the control group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). After controlling for patients' demographics and pharmacists’ questions, there was a statistical difference between the two patient groups in their odds of expressing at least one concern utterance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This pilot study suggests that collecting PRO from patients with chronic illnesses and providing results to pharmacists and patients can help patients express their health and medication concerns. RxTalk™ would be useful for pharmacists who wish to improve the recognition and management of medication-related problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of a digital health tool on patients’ interaction with community pharmacists: A pilot randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of digital Patient- Reported Outcomes (PRO) tools has been shown to enhance the exchange of information and shared decision-making in medical encounters. However, their influence on patient-pharmacist interactions has not yet been explored.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to examine the impact of RxTalk™, a digital PRO tool, in supporting the communication between patients and pharmacists compared to usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><em>Intervention</em><strong>:</strong><span> RxTalk™ was developed to collect information about medication adherence and beliefs, using a tablet computer.</span></p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted at a community pharmacy in Wisconsin, USA. Sixty patients were randomized to either the intervention group who used RxTalk™ during medication pick-up or the control group who did not use the tool. Patients who used RxTalk™ received paper copies of their responses which were also shared with pharmacists. The consultation was audio-recorded for both groups and coded using the Active Patient Participation Coding scale. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted with both groups within one week of enrollment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patient tapes were analyzed. In the unadjusted model, patients in the intervention group had a higher active participation rate (<em>p</em> = 0.004) and raised significantly more concerns during consultations (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) compared to the control group. Pharmacists asked twice as many questions while counseling patients in the intervention group compared to the control group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). After controlling for patients' demographics and pharmacists’ questions, there was a statistical difference between the two patient groups in their odds of expressing at least one concern utterance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This pilot study suggests that collecting PRO from patients with chronic illnesses and providing results to pharmacists and patients can help patients express their health and medication concerns. RxTalk™ would be useful for pharmacists who wish to improve the recognition and management of medication-related problems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155174112400202X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155174112400202X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字患者报告结果(PRO)工具的使用已被证明可加强医疗过程中的信息交流和共同决策。然而,这些工具对患者与药剂师之间互动的影响尚未得到探讨:本研究旨在探讨数字 PRO 工具 RxTalk™ 在支持患者与药剂师之间的交流方面与常规护理相比所产生的影响:方法:干预:开发了 RxTalk™,使用平板电脑收集有关用药依从性和信念的信息:研究设计:在美国威斯康星州的一家社区药房开展了一项试验性随机对照研究。60 名患者被随机分为干预组(在取药时使用 RxTalk™)和对照组(不使用该工具)。使用 RxTalk™ 的患者会收到纸质版的回复,并与药剂师共享。两组患者的咨询过程都进行了录音,并使用 "患者积极参与编码量表 "进行编码。在入组一周内对两组患者进行了后续电话访谈:对患者录音带进行了分析。在未经调整的模型中,干预组患者的主动参与率更高(p = 0.004),在咨询过程中提出的问题明显更多(p 结论:干预组患者的主动参与率更高(p = 0.004),在咨询过程中提出的问题明显更多(p = 0.004):这项试点研究表明,收集慢性病患者的 PRO 并将结果提供给药剂师和患者,可以帮助患者表达他们对健康和用药的担忧。RxTalk™ 对希望改善药物相关问题的识别和管理的药剂师很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the impact of a digital health tool on patients’ interaction with community pharmacists: A pilot randomized controlled study

Background

The use of digital Patient- Reported Outcomes (PRO) tools has been shown to enhance the exchange of information and shared decision-making in medical encounters. However, their influence on patient-pharmacist interactions has not yet been explored.

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the impact of RxTalk™, a digital PRO tool, in supporting the communication between patients and pharmacists compared to usual care.

Methods

Intervention: RxTalk™ was developed to collect information about medication adherence and beliefs, using a tablet computer.

Study design

A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted at a community pharmacy in Wisconsin, USA. Sixty patients were randomized to either the intervention group who used RxTalk™ during medication pick-up or the control group who did not use the tool. Patients who used RxTalk™ received paper copies of their responses which were also shared with pharmacists. The consultation was audio-recorded for both groups and coded using the Active Patient Participation Coding scale. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted with both groups within one week of enrollment.

Results

Patient tapes were analyzed. In the unadjusted model, patients in the intervention group had a higher active participation rate (p = 0.004) and raised significantly more concerns during consultations (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Pharmacists asked twice as many questions while counseling patients in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). After controlling for patients' demographics and pharmacists’ questions, there was a statistical difference between the two patient groups in their odds of expressing at least one concern utterance.

Conclusion

This pilot study suggests that collecting PRO from patients with chronic illnesses and providing results to pharmacists and patients can help patients express their health and medication concerns. RxTalk™ would be useful for pharmacists who wish to improve the recognition and management of medication-related problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
The association between patient self-reported experiences with medication discharge counselling and hospital readmissions: A cross-sectional analysis of a population-based survey. Enhancing older Veterans' care: Insights from medication reviews and deprescribing interventions. Development and evaluation of a model to identify publications on the clinical impact of pharmacist interventions. A graphical model to make explicit pharmacist clinical reasoning during medication review. Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1