卵巢中肾型腺癌:发病率、诊断重现性、预后和 PAX2 的价值。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1002/2056-4538.12389
Martin Köbel, Eun Young Kang, Sandra Lee, Travis Ogilvie, Tatjana Terzic, Linyuan Wang, Nicholas JP Wiebe, Zainab Al-Shamma, Linda S Cook, Gregg S Nelson, Colin JR Stewart, Andreas von Deimling, Felix KF Kommoss, Cheng-Han Lee
{"title":"卵巢中肾型腺癌:发病率、诊断重现性、预后和 PAX2 的价值。","authors":"Martin Köbel,&nbsp;Eun Young Kang,&nbsp;Sandra Lee,&nbsp;Travis Ogilvie,&nbsp;Tatjana Terzic,&nbsp;Linyuan Wang,&nbsp;Nicholas JP Wiebe,&nbsp;Zainab Al-Shamma,&nbsp;Linda S Cook,&nbsp;Gregg S Nelson,&nbsp;Colin JR Stewart,&nbsp;Andreas von Deimling,&nbsp;Felix KF Kommoss,&nbsp;Cheng-Han Lee","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.12389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mesonephric-type (or -like) adenocarcinomas (MAs) of the ovary are an uncommon and aggressive histotype. They appear to arise through transdifferentiation from Müllerian lesions creating diagnostic challenges. Thus, we aimed to develop a histologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) approach to optimize the identification of MA over its histologic mimics, such as ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). First, we screened 1,537 ovarian epithelial neoplasms with a four-marker IHC panel of GATA3, TTF1, ER, and PR followed by a morphological review of EC to identify MA in retrospective cohorts. Interobserver reproducibility for the distinction of MA versus EC was assessed in 66 cases initially without and subsequently with IHC information (four-marker panel). Expression of PAX2, CD10, and calretinin was evaluated separately, and survival analyses were performed. We identified 23 MAs from which 22 were among 385 cases initially reported as EC (5.7%) and 1 as clear cell carcinoma. The interobserver reproducibility increased from fair to substantial (<i>κ</i> = 0.376–0.727) with the integration of the four-marker IHC panel. PAX2 was the single most sensitive and specific marker to distinguish MA from EC and could be used as a first-line marker together with ER/PR and GATA3/TTF1. Patients with MA had significantly increased risk of earlier death from disease (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62–5.85; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) compared with patients with EC, when adjusted for age, stage, and p53 status. A diagnosis of MA has prognostic implications for stage I disease, and due to the subtlety of morphological features in some tumors, a low threshold for ancillary testing is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesonephric-type adenocarcinomas of the ovary: prevalence, diagnostic reproducibility, outcome, and value of PAX2\",\"authors\":\"Martin Köbel,&nbsp;Eun Young Kang,&nbsp;Sandra Lee,&nbsp;Travis Ogilvie,&nbsp;Tatjana Terzic,&nbsp;Linyuan Wang,&nbsp;Nicholas JP Wiebe,&nbsp;Zainab Al-Shamma,&nbsp;Linda S Cook,&nbsp;Gregg S Nelson,&nbsp;Colin JR Stewart,&nbsp;Andreas von Deimling,&nbsp;Felix KF Kommoss,&nbsp;Cheng-Han Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2056-4538.12389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mesonephric-type (or -like) adenocarcinomas (MAs) of the ovary are an uncommon and aggressive histotype. They appear to arise through transdifferentiation from Müllerian lesions creating diagnostic challenges. Thus, we aimed to develop a histologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) approach to optimize the identification of MA over its histologic mimics, such as ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). First, we screened 1,537 ovarian epithelial neoplasms with a four-marker IHC panel of GATA3, TTF1, ER, and PR followed by a morphological review of EC to identify MA in retrospective cohorts. Interobserver reproducibility for the distinction of MA versus EC was assessed in 66 cases initially without and subsequently with IHC information (four-marker panel). Expression of PAX2, CD10, and calretinin was evaluated separately, and survival analyses were performed. We identified 23 MAs from which 22 were among 385 cases initially reported as EC (5.7%) and 1 as clear cell carcinoma. The interobserver reproducibility increased from fair to substantial (<i>κ</i> = 0.376–0.727) with the integration of the four-marker IHC panel. PAX2 was the single most sensitive and specific marker to distinguish MA from EC and could be used as a first-line marker together with ER/PR and GATA3/TTF1. Patients with MA had significantly increased risk of earlier death from disease (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62–5.85; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) compared with patients with EC, when adjusted for age, stage, and p53 status. A diagnosis of MA has prognostic implications for stage I disease, and due to the subtlety of morphological features in some tumors, a low threshold for ancillary testing is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.12389\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.12389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵巢中肾型(或类)腺癌(MAs)是一种不常见的侵袭性组织类型。它们似乎是从Müllerian病变转化而来,这给诊断带来了挑战。因此,我们旨在开发一种组织学和免疫组化(IHC)方法,以优化卵巢腺癌与其组织学模拟物(如卵巢子宫内膜样癌(EC))的鉴别。首先,我们用 GATA3、TTF1、ER 和 PR 四标记 IHC 面板筛选了 1,537 例卵巢上皮性肿瘤,然后对 EC 进行形态学审查,以在回顾性队列中识别 MA。在 66 例病例中,评估了最初无 IHC 信息和随后有 IHC 信息(四标记面板)的病例在区分 MA 与 EC 时的观察者间再现性。分别评估了 PAX2、CD10 和 calretinin 的表达,并进行了生存分析。我们从中发现了 23 例 MA,其中 22 例最初被报告为 EC(5.7%),1 例为透明细胞癌。随着四标记 IHC 面板的整合,观察者间的可重复性从一般增加到相当高(κ = 0.376-0.727)。PAX2是区分MA和EC最敏感、最特异的标志物,可与ER/PR和GATA3/TTF1一起作为一线标志物。MA患者较早死于疾病的风险明显增加(危险比 = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62-5.85; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mesonephric-type adenocarcinomas of the ovary: prevalence, diagnostic reproducibility, outcome, and value of PAX2

Mesonephric-type (or -like) adenocarcinomas (MAs) of the ovary are an uncommon and aggressive histotype. They appear to arise through transdifferentiation from Müllerian lesions creating diagnostic challenges. Thus, we aimed to develop a histologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) approach to optimize the identification of MA over its histologic mimics, such as ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). First, we screened 1,537 ovarian epithelial neoplasms with a four-marker IHC panel of GATA3, TTF1, ER, and PR followed by a morphological review of EC to identify MA in retrospective cohorts. Interobserver reproducibility for the distinction of MA versus EC was assessed in 66 cases initially without and subsequently with IHC information (four-marker panel). Expression of PAX2, CD10, and calretinin was evaluated separately, and survival analyses were performed. We identified 23 MAs from which 22 were among 385 cases initially reported as EC (5.7%) and 1 as clear cell carcinoma. The interobserver reproducibility increased from fair to substantial (κ = 0.376–0.727) with the integration of the four-marker IHC panel. PAX2 was the single most sensitive and specific marker to distinguish MA from EC and could be used as a first-line marker together with ER/PR and GATA3/TTF1. Patients with MA had significantly increased risk of earlier death from disease (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62–5.85; p < 0.0001) compared with patients with EC, when adjusted for age, stage, and p53 status. A diagnosis of MA has prognostic implications for stage I disease, and due to the subtlety of morphological features in some tumors, a low threshold for ancillary testing is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
期刊最新文献
Challenges for pathologists in implementing clinical microbiome diagnostic testing The expression of YAP1 and other transcription factors contributes to lineage plasticity in combined small cell lung carcinoma TROP2 in colorectal carcinoma: associations with histopathology, molecular phenotype, and patient prognosis Predicting lymph node recurrence in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma: collaboration between artificial intelligence and pathologists VEGFA gene variants are associated with breast cancer progression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1