{"title":"关于洗牌和分裂自动机","authors":"Ignacio Mollo Cunningham","doi":"arxiv-2407.02660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a class of finite state three-tape transducers which models the\noperation of shuffling and splitting words. We present them as automata over\nthe so-called Shuffling Monoid. These automata can be seen as either shufflers\nor splitters interchangeably. We prove that functionality is decidable for\nsplitters, and we also show that the equivalence between functional splitters\nis decidable. Moreover, in the deterministic case, the algorithm for\nequivalence is polynomial on the number of states of the splitter.","PeriodicalId":501124,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Shuffling and Splitting Automata\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio Mollo Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.02660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a class of finite state three-tape transducers which models the\\noperation of shuffling and splitting words. We present them as automata over\\nthe so-called Shuffling Monoid. These automata can be seen as either shufflers\\nor splitters interchangeably. We prove that functionality is decidable for\\nsplitters, and we also show that the equivalence between functional splitters\\nis decidable. Moreover, in the deterministic case, the algorithm for\\nequivalence is polynomial on the number of states of the splitter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.02660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.02660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We consider a class of finite state three-tape transducers which models the
operation of shuffling and splitting words. We present them as automata over
the so-called Shuffling Monoid. These automata can be seen as either shufflers
or splitters interchangeably. We prove that functionality is decidable for
splitters, and we also show that the equivalence between functional splitters
is decidable. Moreover, in the deterministic case, the algorithm for
equivalence is polynomial on the number of states of the splitter.