学习动机与职业犹豫不决之间的双向和纵向联系

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Motivation and Emotion Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s11031-024-10082-1
Remy Mbanga, Catherine F. Ratelle, Stéphane Duchesne
{"title":"学习动机与职业犹豫不决之间的双向和纵向联系","authors":"Remy Mbanga, Catherine F. Ratelle, Stéphane Duchesne","doi":"10.1007/s11031-024-10082-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vocational indecision has been found to be either a predictor or a consequence of academic motivation, but no study has examined whether the two processes share reciprocal links. Three academic motivation orientations have been found to contribute to these two processes: autonomous (i.e., going to school for the pleasure to learn or for the personally valued reasons), controlled (i.e., going to school to alleviate internal or external pressures) and amotivation (i.e., going to school without purpose). The goal of the present study was to test reciprocal and longitudinal links between each of these three motivation orientations and vocational indecision. This longitudinal study used a sample of 584 secondary school students (55% girls) surveyed annually over a 4-year period, where the effect of vocational indecision on each academic motivation orientation and the effect of each academic motivation on vocational indecision were estimated simultaneously. These links were tested both at interindividual (i.e., students are compared with each other) and intraindividual levels (i.e., students are compared to themselves). Results of cross-lagged models indicate that vocational indecision was negatively predicted by autonomous academic motivation but not vice versa, and that this link appeared only at the intraindividual level. Also, vocational indecision simultaneously predicted and was predicted by controlled academic motivation and academic amotivation at both levels. These results suggest that guidance counsellors could support the emergence and maintenance of autonomous motivation in students, to help them make a vocational decision. Also, the scope of their action could extend to school retention, as actions taken to support vocational decision-making could affect students’ motivation to engage or stay in school.</p>","PeriodicalId":48282,"journal":{"name":"Motivation and Emotion","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bidirectional and longitudinal associations between academic motivation and vocational indecision\",\"authors\":\"Remy Mbanga, Catherine F. Ratelle, Stéphane Duchesne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11031-024-10082-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Vocational indecision has been found to be either a predictor or a consequence of academic motivation, but no study has examined whether the two processes share reciprocal links. Three academic motivation orientations have been found to contribute to these two processes: autonomous (i.e., going to school for the pleasure to learn or for the personally valued reasons), controlled (i.e., going to school to alleviate internal or external pressures) and amotivation (i.e., going to school without purpose). The goal of the present study was to test reciprocal and longitudinal links between each of these three motivation orientations and vocational indecision. This longitudinal study used a sample of 584 secondary school students (55% girls) surveyed annually over a 4-year period, where the effect of vocational indecision on each academic motivation orientation and the effect of each academic motivation on vocational indecision were estimated simultaneously. These links were tested both at interindividual (i.e., students are compared with each other) and intraindividual levels (i.e., students are compared to themselves). Results of cross-lagged models indicate that vocational indecision was negatively predicted by autonomous academic motivation but not vice versa, and that this link appeared only at the intraindividual level. Also, vocational indecision simultaneously predicted and was predicted by controlled academic motivation and academic amotivation at both levels. These results suggest that guidance counsellors could support the emergence and maintenance of autonomous motivation in students, to help them make a vocational decision. Also, the scope of their action could extend to school retention, as actions taken to support vocational decision-making could affect students’ motivation to engage or stay in school.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motivation and Emotion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motivation and Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10082-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motivation and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10082-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究发现,职业犹豫不决既可以是学习动机的预测因素,也可以是学习动机的结果,但还没有研究探讨这两个过程是否存在相互联系。研究发现,有三种学习动机取向有助于这两个过程:自主型(即为了学习的乐趣或个人重视的原因而上学)、受控型(即为了减轻内部或外部压力而上学)和非激励型(即无目的上学)。本研究的目的是检验这三种动机取向与职业犹豫不决之间的相互联系和纵向联系。这项纵向研究以 584 名中学生(55% 为女生)为样本,在 4 年内每年进行一次调查,同时估算职业犹豫不决对每种学习动机取向的影响,以及每种学习动机取向对职业犹豫不决的影响。这些联系在个体间(即学生之间进行比较)和个体内(即学生与自己进行比较)两个层面上进行了检验。交叉滞后模型的结果表明,职业犹豫不决受自主学习动机的负向预测,反之亦然,而且这种联系只出现在个体内部层面。此外,在两个层面上,职业犹豫不决同时也被受控学业动机和学业非动机所预测。这些结果表明,辅导员可以支持学生自主动机的产生和维持,帮助他们做出职业决定。此外,他们的行动范围还可以扩展到在校学习方面,因为支持职业决策的行动会影响学生参与或留在学校的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bidirectional and longitudinal associations between academic motivation and vocational indecision

Vocational indecision has been found to be either a predictor or a consequence of academic motivation, but no study has examined whether the two processes share reciprocal links. Three academic motivation orientations have been found to contribute to these two processes: autonomous (i.e., going to school for the pleasure to learn or for the personally valued reasons), controlled (i.e., going to school to alleviate internal or external pressures) and amotivation (i.e., going to school without purpose). The goal of the present study was to test reciprocal and longitudinal links between each of these three motivation orientations and vocational indecision. This longitudinal study used a sample of 584 secondary school students (55% girls) surveyed annually over a 4-year period, where the effect of vocational indecision on each academic motivation orientation and the effect of each academic motivation on vocational indecision were estimated simultaneously. These links were tested both at interindividual (i.e., students are compared with each other) and intraindividual levels (i.e., students are compared to themselves). Results of cross-lagged models indicate that vocational indecision was negatively predicted by autonomous academic motivation but not vice versa, and that this link appeared only at the intraindividual level. Also, vocational indecision simultaneously predicted and was predicted by controlled academic motivation and academic amotivation at both levels. These results suggest that guidance counsellors could support the emergence and maintenance of autonomous motivation in students, to help them make a vocational decision. Also, the scope of their action could extend to school retention, as actions taken to support vocational decision-making could affect students’ motivation to engage or stay in school.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Motivation and Emotion publishes articles on human motivational and emotional phenomena that make theoretical advances by linking empirical findings to underlying processes. Submissions should focus on key problems in motivation and emotion, and, if using non-human participants, should contribute to theories concerning human behavior.  Articles should be explanatory rather than merely descriptive, providing the data necessary to understand the origins of motivation and emotion, to explicate why, how, and under what conditions motivational and emotional states change, and to document that these processes are important to human functioning.A range of methodological approaches are welcome, with methodological rigor as the key criterion.  Manuscripts that rely exclusively on self-report data are appropriate, but published articles tend to be those that rely on objective measures (e.g., behavioral observations, psychophysiological responses, reaction times, brain activity, and performance or achievement indicators) either singly or combination with self-report data.The journal generally does not publish scale development and validation articles.  However, it is open to articles that focus on the post-validation contribution that a new measure can make.  Scale development and validation work therefore may be submitted if it is used as a necessary prerequisite to follow-up studies that demonstrate the importance of the new scale in making a theoretical advance.
期刊最新文献
Evaluative conditioning of conflict aversiveness and its effects on adaptive control The effect of a physically formidable competitor or cooperator on attraction to violent video games Effects of intensity on emotion regulation strategy preferences are emotion-specific Financial and prosocial rewards differentially enhance cognition in younger and older healthy adults Inbound friend or foe: how motion bistability is resolved under threat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1