{"title":"客户投资组合管理是否有审计费溢价?","authors":"Stuart D. Taylor","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Auditing is a credence good so its quality cannot be determined directly. The gain or loss of large clients is one publicly available signal that can used by other clients to ascertain the quality provided by audit firms. This paper examines whether this quality signal results in firms earning fee premiums and discounts. Empirical examination of a sample of 16,233 firm‐years of listed Australian companies for the period 2011–2021 shows that there is an association between offices and industry groups that gain and lose large clients, in both the current and previous periods, and economically significant fee premiums for both Big‐4 and non‐Big‐4 firms. These results suggest that clients can use auditor portfolio changes as quality signals and that they appear to reward firms that gain large clients and prune their portfolios of poor clients, particularly if these changes are in the same industry as the client.","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there audit fee premiums for client portfolio management?\",\"authors\":\"Stuart D. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijau.12361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Auditing is a credence good so its quality cannot be determined directly. The gain or loss of large clients is one publicly available signal that can used by other clients to ascertain the quality provided by audit firms. This paper examines whether this quality signal results in firms earning fee premiums and discounts. Empirical examination of a sample of 16,233 firm‐years of listed Australian companies for the period 2011–2021 shows that there is an association between offices and industry groups that gain and lose large clients, in both the current and previous periods, and economically significant fee premiums for both Big‐4 and non‐Big‐4 firms. These results suggest that clients can use auditor portfolio changes as quality signals and that they appear to reward firms that gain large clients and prune their portfolios of poor clients, particularly if these changes are in the same industry as the client.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Auditing\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Auditing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12361\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are there audit fee premiums for client portfolio management?
Auditing is a credence good so its quality cannot be determined directly. The gain or loss of large clients is one publicly available signal that can used by other clients to ascertain the quality provided by audit firms. This paper examines whether this quality signal results in firms earning fee premiums and discounts. Empirical examination of a sample of 16,233 firm‐years of listed Australian companies for the period 2011–2021 shows that there is an association between offices and industry groups that gain and lose large clients, in both the current and previous periods, and economically significant fee premiums for both Big‐4 and non‐Big‐4 firms. These results suggest that clients can use auditor portfolio changes as quality signals and that they appear to reward firms that gain large clients and prune their portfolios of poor clients, particularly if these changes are in the same industry as the client.
期刊介绍:
In addition to communicating the results of original auditing research, the International Journal of Auditing also aims to advance knowledge in auditing by publishing critiques, thought leadership papers and literature reviews on specific aspects of auditing. The journal seeks to publish articles that have international appeal either due to the topic transcending national frontiers or due to the clear potential for readers to apply the results or ideas in their local environments. While articles must be methodologically and theoretically sound, any research orientation is acceptable. This means that papers may have an analytical and statistical, behavioural, economic and financial (including agency), sociological, critical, or historical basis. The editors consider articles for publication which fit into one or more of the following subject categories: • Financial statement audits • Public sector/governmental auditing • Internal auditing • Audit education and methods of teaching auditing (including case studies) • Audit aspects of corporate governance, including audit committees • Audit quality • Audit fees and related issues • Environmental, social and sustainability audits • Audit related ethical issues • Audit regulation • Independence issues • Legal liability and other legal issues • Auditing history • New and emerging audit and assurance issues