R. Neuhäuser, D. L. Neuhäuser, M. Mugrauer, D. Luge, J. Chapman
{"title":"米拉发现问题--大卫-法布里西乌斯(David Fabricius)在 1596 年和 1609 年的观测(以及之前其他人的观测?定位精度、亮度、色彩指数和周期","authors":"R. Neuhäuser, D. L. Neuhäuser, M. Mugrauer, D. Luge, J. Chapman","doi":"10.1002/asna.20230131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pulsating variable star Mira (<i>o</i> Ceti) was observed by David Fabricius (Frisia) in 1596 and 1609. We review suggested previous detections (e.g., China, Hipparchos). We analyze all Mira records from Fabricius in their historical context. Fabricius measured the separation of Mira to other stars to ±1.6−1.7′. From his texts, we derive a brightness (slightly brighter than Hamal) of ca. 1.9±0.1 mag and a color index B-V<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≃</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\simeq $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>1.3−1.4 mag (‘like Mars’) for 1596 Aug 3 (Jul.). Mira started to fainten 19 days later and was observed until mid/late Oct. We show why such a red star cannot be followed by the naked eye until ca. 6 mag: For Mira's color at disappearance and altitude from Frisia, the limit is reduced by ca. 1.0 mag. Since Fabricius connected the Mira brightening with the close-by prograde Jupiter, he re-detected it only 12 years later, probably shortly before a relatively bright maximum—discoveries are strongly affected by biases. A Mira period of 330.2 days is consistent with both the oldest data (from Fabricius 1596 to Hevelius 1660) and the most current data (VSX 2004–2023), so that we see no evidence for secular period or phase shifts. (We also present Fabricius' observations of P Cygni in 1602.)</p>","PeriodicalId":55442,"journal":{"name":"Astronomische Nachrichten","volume":"345 6-7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mira discovery problem—Observations by David Fabricius in 1596 and 1609 (and by others before?): Positional accuracy, brightness, color index, and period\",\"authors\":\"R. Neuhäuser, D. L. Neuhäuser, M. Mugrauer, D. Luge, J. Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asna.20230131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The pulsating variable star Mira (<i>o</i> Ceti) was observed by David Fabricius (Frisia) in 1596 and 1609. We review suggested previous detections (e.g., China, Hipparchos). We analyze all Mira records from Fabricius in their historical context. Fabricius measured the separation of Mira to other stars to ±1.6−1.7′. From his texts, we derive a brightness (slightly brighter than Hamal) of ca. 1.9±0.1 mag and a color index B-V<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>≃</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\simeq $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>1.3−1.4 mag (‘like Mars’) for 1596 Aug 3 (Jul.). Mira started to fainten 19 days later and was observed until mid/late Oct. We show why such a red star cannot be followed by the naked eye until ca. 6 mag: For Mira's color at disappearance and altitude from Frisia, the limit is reduced by ca. 1.0 mag. Since Fabricius connected the Mira brightening with the close-by prograde Jupiter, he re-detected it only 12 years later, probably shortly before a relatively bright maximum—discoveries are strongly affected by biases. A Mira period of 330.2 days is consistent with both the oldest data (from Fabricius 1596 to Hevelius 1660) and the most current data (VSX 2004–2023), so that we see no evidence for secular period or phase shifts. (We also present Fabricius' observations of P Cygni in 1602.)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomische Nachrichten\",\"volume\":\"345 6-7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomische Nachrichten\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asna.20230131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomische Nachrichten","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asna.20230131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Mira discovery problem—Observations by David Fabricius in 1596 and 1609 (and by others before?): Positional accuracy, brightness, color index, and period
The pulsating variable star Mira (o Ceti) was observed by David Fabricius (Frisia) in 1596 and 1609. We review suggested previous detections (e.g., China, Hipparchos). We analyze all Mira records from Fabricius in their historical context. Fabricius measured the separation of Mira to other stars to ±1.6−1.7′. From his texts, we derive a brightness (slightly brighter than Hamal) of ca. 1.9±0.1 mag and a color index B-V1.3−1.4 mag (‘like Mars’) for 1596 Aug 3 (Jul.). Mira started to fainten 19 days later and was observed until mid/late Oct. We show why such a red star cannot be followed by the naked eye until ca. 6 mag: For Mira's color at disappearance and altitude from Frisia, the limit is reduced by ca. 1.0 mag. Since Fabricius connected the Mira brightening with the close-by prograde Jupiter, he re-detected it only 12 years later, probably shortly before a relatively bright maximum—discoveries are strongly affected by biases. A Mira period of 330.2 days is consistent with both the oldest data (from Fabricius 1596 to Hevelius 1660) and the most current data (VSX 2004–2023), so that we see no evidence for secular period or phase shifts. (We also present Fabricius' observations of P Cygni in 1602.)
期刊介绍:
Astronomische Nachrichten, founded in 1821 by H. C. Schumacher, is the oldest astronomical journal worldwide still being published. Famous astronomical discoveries and important papers on astronomy and astrophysics published in more than 300 volumes of the journal give an outstanding representation of the progress of astronomical research over the last 180 years. Today, Astronomical Notes/ Astronomische Nachrichten publishes articles in the field of observational and theoretical astrophysics and related topics in solar-system and solar physics. Additional, papers on astronomical instrumentation ground-based and space-based as well as papers about numerical astrophysical techniques and supercomputer modelling are covered. Papers can be completed by short video sequences in the electronic version. Astronomical Notes/ Astronomische Nachrichten also publishes special issues of meeting proceedings.