评估两种不同的化学发光分析仪系统在筛查捐献者样本是否感染 HCV 方面的性能

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Egyptian Liver Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1186/s43066-024-00359-y
Dalia Diaa ElDine Salem, Heba-TAllah Nader ElSayed
{"title":"评估两种不同的化学发光分析仪系统在筛查捐献者样本是否感染 HCV 方面的性能","authors":"Dalia Diaa ElDine Salem, Heba-TAllah Nader ElSayed","doi":"10.1186/s43066-024-00359-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The approved screening test for HCV infection among blood donors is the HCV antibody test. The diagnostic performances of the available immunoassays in the market that target different HCV antigens have not yet been thoroughly analyzed. Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic performances of two different chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) assays. We analyzed 1909 samples using two assay systems (COBAS e601 ROCHE® & Vitros 3600 ORTHO®) and evaluated the agreement of each with the gold standard method ELISA, as well as studying their diagnostic performances. The Cohen’s Kappa statistics revealed excellent agreement between ELISA and both CLIA methods performed on Cobas e 601 ROCHE and Vitrous 3600 ORTHO (0.81 & 0.994 respectively). The sensitivities and positive predictive values were 95.05% and 73.85% for Cobas e 601 ROCHE, 100.00%, and 98.97% for Vitrous 3600 ORTHO, respectively. Excellent diagnostic performance was detected by both assays; however, Vitros 3600 ORTHO outperformed Cobas e 601 ROCHE in terms of sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":11620,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Liver Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the performance of two different chemiluminescence analyzers systems in screening donors’ samples for HCV infection\",\"authors\":\"Dalia Diaa ElDine Salem, Heba-TAllah Nader ElSayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43066-024-00359-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The approved screening test for HCV infection among blood donors is the HCV antibody test. The diagnostic performances of the available immunoassays in the market that target different HCV antigens have not yet been thoroughly analyzed. Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic performances of two different chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) assays. We analyzed 1909 samples using two assay systems (COBAS e601 ROCHE® & Vitros 3600 ORTHO®) and evaluated the agreement of each with the gold standard method ELISA, as well as studying their diagnostic performances. The Cohen’s Kappa statistics revealed excellent agreement between ELISA and both CLIA methods performed on Cobas e 601 ROCHE and Vitrous 3600 ORTHO (0.81 & 0.994 respectively). The sensitivities and positive predictive values were 95.05% and 73.85% for Cobas e 601 ROCHE, 100.00%, and 98.97% for Vitrous 3600 ORTHO, respectively. Excellent diagnostic performance was detected by both assays; however, Vitros 3600 ORTHO outperformed Cobas e 601 ROCHE in terms of sensitivity and specificity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Liver Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Liver Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00359-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Liver Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00359-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已获批准的献血者 HCV 感染筛查试验是 HCV 抗体检测。目前尚未对市场上针对不同 HCV 抗原的现有免疫测定的诊断性能进行全面分析。我们的研究旨在评估两种不同化学发光免疫测定(CLIA)的诊断性能。我们使用两种检测系统(COBAS e601 ROCHE® 和 Vitros 3600 ORTHO®)分析了 1909 份样本,评估了每种系统与黄金标准方法 ELISA 的一致性,并研究了它们的诊断性能。科恩卡帕(Cohen's Kappa)统计显示,ELISA 与在 Cobas e 601 ROCHE 和 Vitrous 3600 ORTHO 上进行的两种 CLIA 方法之间的一致性非常好(分别为 0.81 和 0.994)。Cobas e 601 ROCHE 的灵敏度和阳性预测值分别为 95.05% 和 73.85%,Vitrous 3600 ORTHO 的灵敏度和阳性预测值分别为 100.00% 和 98.97%。两种检测方法都具有出色的诊断性能;但就灵敏度和特异性而言,Vitros 3600 ORTHO 优于 Cobas e 601 ROCHE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the performance of two different chemiluminescence analyzers systems in screening donors’ samples for HCV infection
The approved screening test for HCV infection among blood donors is the HCV antibody test. The diagnostic performances of the available immunoassays in the market that target different HCV antigens have not yet been thoroughly analyzed. Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic performances of two different chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) assays. We analyzed 1909 samples using two assay systems (COBAS e601 ROCHE® & Vitros 3600 ORTHO®) and evaluated the agreement of each with the gold standard method ELISA, as well as studying their diagnostic performances. The Cohen’s Kappa statistics revealed excellent agreement between ELISA and both CLIA methods performed on Cobas e 601 ROCHE and Vitrous 3600 ORTHO (0.81 & 0.994 respectively). The sensitivities and positive predictive values were 95.05% and 73.85% for Cobas e 601 ROCHE, 100.00%, and 98.97% for Vitrous 3600 ORTHO, respectively. Excellent diagnostic performance was detected by both assays; however, Vitros 3600 ORTHO outperformed Cobas e 601 ROCHE in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Liver Journal
Egyptian Liver Journal Medicine-Hepatology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in HCV patients previously treated with direct-acting antivirals Advancements in ascites management: a comprehensive narrative review of the Alfa Pump system Rifaximin alone vs combination with norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis with hepatic encephalopathy: randomized controlled trial Effect of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplementation on circadian clock in rats with fructose-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver Generic sofosbuvir and daclatasvir for treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with sickle cell disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1