关于乳糜泻的孟德尔随机研究的系统性回顾。

Mahmud Omar, Salih Nassar, Mohammad Omar, Mohammad Naffaa, Adi Lahat, Kassem Sharif
{"title":"关于乳糜泻的孟德尔随机研究的系统性回顾。","authors":"Mahmud Omar, Salih Nassar, Mohammad Omar, Mohammad Naffaa, Adi Lahat, Kassem Sharif","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Mendelian randomization (MR) has become an important tool in epidemiology, used to infer causal relationships diseases. This review aims to consolidate existing MR evidence concerning celiac disease (CeD).\nMethods: We systematically searched major databases up to May 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Only MR studies explicitly investigating CeD were included. We assessed the quality of each study based on the strength, independence, and exclusivity of the instrumental variables used. Results: From an initial pool of 207 articles, 35 met our inclusion criteria. These studies frequently addressed the relationship between CeD and autoimmune diseases like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and explored connections with gut microbiota, various cancers, and metabolic disorders. Significant findings highlight a robust bi-directional association between IBD and CeD and complex interactions with gut microbiota. Notably, many associations reported were near the threshold of clinical significance.\nConclusion: This systematic review highlights the dual nature of current MR evidence on CeD. On one hand, we observe consistent associations between CeD, IBDs, and gut microbiota. On the other, there is a plethora of weaker associations that raise critical questions about their clinical and research significance. This work lays a solid foundation for deeper investigations into these weaker links, particularly in relation to lymphomas and psychiatric conditions. It calls for an expanded use of MR and other methodologies to explore under-researched areas.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Celiac Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Mahmud Omar, Salih Nassar, Mohammad Omar, Mohammad Naffaa, Adi Lahat, Kassem Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objective: Mendelian randomization (MR) has become an important tool in epidemiology, used to infer causal relationships diseases. This review aims to consolidate existing MR evidence concerning celiac disease (CeD).\\nMethods: We systematically searched major databases up to May 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Only MR studies explicitly investigating CeD were included. We assessed the quality of each study based on the strength, independence, and exclusivity of the instrumental variables used. Results: From an initial pool of 207 articles, 35 met our inclusion criteria. These studies frequently addressed the relationship between CeD and autoimmune diseases like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and explored connections with gut microbiota, various cancers, and metabolic disorders. Significant findings highlight a robust bi-directional association between IBD and CeD and complex interactions with gut microbiota. Notably, many associations reported were near the threshold of clinical significance.\\nConclusion: This systematic review highlights the dual nature of current MR evidence on CeD. On one hand, we observe consistent associations between CeD, IBDs, and gut microbiota. On the other, there is a plethora of weaker associations that raise critical questions about their clinical and research significance. This work lays a solid foundation for deeper investigations into these weaker links, particularly in relation to lymphomas and psychiatric conditions. It calls for an expanded use of MR and other methodologies to explore under-researched areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.24309885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.24309885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:孟德尔随机化(MR)已成为流行病学的重要工具,用于推断疾病的因果关系。本综述旨在整合有关乳糜泻(CeD)的现有孟德尔随机证据:我们按照 PRISMA 指南系统地检索了截至 2024 年 5 月的主要数据库。只纳入了明确调查乳糜泻的磁共振研究。我们根据所用工具变量的强度、独立性和排他性评估了每项研究的质量。结果:在最初的 207 篇文章中,有 35 篇符合我们的纳入标准。这些研究经常涉及 CeD 与炎症性肠病 (IBD) 等自身免疫性疾病之间的关系,并探讨了与肠道微生物群、各种癌症和代谢紊乱之间的联系。重要的研究结果凸显了 IBD 和 CeD 之间的紧密双向联系以及与肠道微生物群的复杂相互作用。值得注意的是,报告的许多关联接近临床意义的临界值:本系统性综述强调了目前有关 CeD 的 MR 证据的双重性质。一方面,我们观察到 CeD、IBD 和肠道微生物群之间存在一致的关联。另一方面,也存在大量关联性较弱的情况,这就对其临床和研究意义提出了关键问题。这项工作为深入研究这些较弱的关联奠定了坚实的基础,尤其是与淋巴瘤和精神疾病有关的关联。它呼吁扩大 MR 和其他方法的使用范围,以探索研究不足的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Celiac Disease.
Background and Objective: Mendelian randomization (MR) has become an important tool in epidemiology, used to infer causal relationships diseases. This review aims to consolidate existing MR evidence concerning celiac disease (CeD). Methods: We systematically searched major databases up to May 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Only MR studies explicitly investigating CeD were included. We assessed the quality of each study based on the strength, independence, and exclusivity of the instrumental variables used. Results: From an initial pool of 207 articles, 35 met our inclusion criteria. These studies frequently addressed the relationship between CeD and autoimmune diseases like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and explored connections with gut microbiota, various cancers, and metabolic disorders. Significant findings highlight a robust bi-directional association between IBD and CeD and complex interactions with gut microbiota. Notably, many associations reported were near the threshold of clinical significance. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the dual nature of current MR evidence on CeD. On one hand, we observe consistent associations between CeD, IBDs, and gut microbiota. On the other, there is a plethora of weaker associations that raise critical questions about their clinical and research significance. This work lays a solid foundation for deeper investigations into these weaker links, particularly in relation to lymphomas and psychiatric conditions. It calls for an expanded use of MR and other methodologies to explore under-researched areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gut microbiome shifts in adolescents after sleeve gastrectomy with increased oral-associated taxa and pro-inflammatory potential Development of a machine-learning model for therapeutic efficacy prediction of preoperative treatment for esophageal cancer using single nucleotide variants of autophagy-related genes Why Symptoms Linger in Quiescent Crohn's Disease: Investigating the Impact of Sulfidogenic Microbes and Sulfur Metabolic Pathways Evidence that extracellular HSPB1 contributes to inflammation in alcohol-associated hepatitis Large language models outperform traditional natural language processing methods in extracting patient-reported outcomes in IBD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1