第一代同性恋和跨性别验证:检验验证代理、学校参与和大学入学的结构关系

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Innovative Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s10755-024-09722-8
Ángel de Jesus Gonzalez, Pearl Lo, Taylor Lewis, Danielle N. Aguilar, Jude Paul Matias Dizon, Jason C. Garvey
{"title":"第一代同性恋和跨性别验证:检验验证代理、学校参与和大学入学的结构关系","authors":"Ángel de Jesus Gonzalez, Pearl Lo, Taylor Lewis, Danielle N. Aguilar, Jude Paul Matias Dizon, Jason C. Garvey","doi":"10.1007/s10755-024-09722-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emerging research suggests that first-generation queer and trans (QT) students experience disproportionate discrimination in schooling leading to disengagement early on in their educational trajectories. Although labeled as “at risk”, first-generation QT students are actually more cognitively engaged in academics than their cisgender and heterosexual peers. Administrators, teachers, counselors, and guardians (validating agents) have an ethical responsibility to foster inclusive schooling contexts for first-generation QT students. This study examines how validating agents impact first-generation QT students’ school engagement, high school GPA, and postsecondary enrollment. We posit a queer theorizing of the ecological validation model of student success and through principles of QuantCrit, we examine the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 through a path analysis. Our results reveal that both talking to parents about college and high school GPA had a positive association with college enrollment for first-generation QT students. We provide recommendations for future research and practice that demand further exploration of first-generation QT students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47065,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Higher Education","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-Generation Queer and Trans Validation: Structural Relationships Examining Validating Agents, School Engagement, and College Enrollment\",\"authors\":\"Ángel de Jesus Gonzalez, Pearl Lo, Taylor Lewis, Danielle N. Aguilar, Jude Paul Matias Dizon, Jason C. Garvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10755-024-09722-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Emerging research suggests that first-generation queer and trans (QT) students experience disproportionate discrimination in schooling leading to disengagement early on in their educational trajectories. Although labeled as “at risk”, first-generation QT students are actually more cognitively engaged in academics than their cisgender and heterosexual peers. Administrators, teachers, counselors, and guardians (validating agents) have an ethical responsibility to foster inclusive schooling contexts for first-generation QT students. This study examines how validating agents impact first-generation QT students’ school engagement, high school GPA, and postsecondary enrollment. We posit a queer theorizing of the ecological validation model of student success and through principles of QuantCrit, we examine the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 through a path analysis. Our results reveal that both talking to parents about college and high school GPA had a positive association with college enrollment for first-generation QT students. We provide recommendations for future research and practice that demand further exploration of first-generation QT students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09722-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09722-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新近的研究表明,第一代同性恋和变性(QT)学生在学校教育中遭受了过多的歧视,导致他们很早就脱离了教育轨迹。虽然第一代 QT 学生被贴上了 "高危 "标签,但实际上,他们比同性和异性学生在学业认知上更投入。管理者、教师、辅导员和监护人(验证者)有道德责任为第一代 QT 学生营造全纳的学校教育环境。本研究探讨了验证机构如何影响第一代 QT 学生的学校参与度、高中 GPA 和中学后入学率。我们对学生成功的生态验证模型提出了一个同性恋理论,并通过 QuantCrit 原则,对 2009 年高中纵向研究进行了路径分析。我们的研究结果表明,对于第一代 QT 学生来说,与父母谈论大学和高中 GPA 都与大学入学率呈正相关。我们对未来的研究和实践提出了建议,要求进一步探索第一代 QT 学生的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First-Generation Queer and Trans Validation: Structural Relationships Examining Validating Agents, School Engagement, and College Enrollment

Emerging research suggests that first-generation queer and trans (QT) students experience disproportionate discrimination in schooling leading to disengagement early on in their educational trajectories. Although labeled as “at risk”, first-generation QT students are actually more cognitively engaged in academics than their cisgender and heterosexual peers. Administrators, teachers, counselors, and guardians (validating agents) have an ethical responsibility to foster inclusive schooling contexts for first-generation QT students. This study examines how validating agents impact first-generation QT students’ school engagement, high school GPA, and postsecondary enrollment. We posit a queer theorizing of the ecological validation model of student success and through principles of QuantCrit, we examine the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 through a path analysis. Our results reveal that both talking to parents about college and high school GPA had a positive association with college enrollment for first-generation QT students. We provide recommendations for future research and practice that demand further exploration of first-generation QT students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovative Higher Education
Innovative Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Innovative Higher Education is a refereed scholarly journal that strives to package fresh ideas in higher education in a straightforward and readable fashion. The four main purposes of Innovative Higher Education are: (1) to present descriptions and evaluations of current innovations and provocative new ideas with relevance for action beyond the immediate context in higher education; (2) to focus on the effect of such innovations on teaching and students; (3) to be open to diverse forms of scholarship and research methods by maintaining flexibility in the selection of topics deemed appropriate for the journal; and (4) to strike a balance between practice and theory by presenting manuscripts in a readable and scholarly manner to both faculty and administrators in the academic community.
期刊最新文献
Investigating Belonging as a Mediator between Culturally Engaging Campus Environments and Satisfaction Improving Implementation of a Large-Scale Curriculum Redesign: An Innovative Approach to Balancing Fidelity and Agency Postdoctoral Scholars’ Emancipatory Strategies to Socialization through Agency Are Scientists Changing their Research Productivity Classes When They Move Up the Academic Ladder? Leading with Trust: How University Leaders can Foster Innovation with Educational Technology through Organizational Trust
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1