西班牙数字护理平台商业模式分类法

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociology Compass Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1111/soc4.13243
Paula Rodríguez‐Modroño
{"title":"西班牙数字护理平台商业模式分类法","authors":"Paula Rodríguez‐Modroño","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years, the proliferation of digital labour platforms has led to the transformation of business models and labour relations in an increasing number of economic activities, including highly feminized and informal traditional sectors, such as care and domestic work. Drawing on an analysis of 37 digital care platforms in Spain, this research compares the distinctive features and structural power dynamics they engender, and it constructs a taxonomy of business models of these care platforms. By analysing the main features of their operational models, we are capable of distinguishing three main types of platforms: marketplace, on‐demand, and digital placement agencies. First, the paper argues that the distinctive features of each digital platform business model have differentiated impacts on working conditions in terms of access to tasks, remuneration, flexibility and means of control. This differentiation allows us to understand what is transformative and what is continuous in platforms' precarization or formalisation of care work and working conditions of carers, mainly women and migrants. Each business model has its differentiated outcomes in terms of labour control and reorganization of women's and migrants' reproductive work. Second, more broadly, while digital care platforms may have contributed to facilitating workers' access to jobs, reducing transaction costs and standardising processes, this has often been through the creation of more flexible and insecure forms of work and to increased market pressures. Therefore, this study contributes to existing research addressing the degree of formalization of labour relations in digital platform work through a nuanced analysis of their business models.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A taxonomy of business models of digital care platforms in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Paula Rodríguez‐Modroño\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/soc4.13243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last few years, the proliferation of digital labour platforms has led to the transformation of business models and labour relations in an increasing number of economic activities, including highly feminized and informal traditional sectors, such as care and domestic work. Drawing on an analysis of 37 digital care platforms in Spain, this research compares the distinctive features and structural power dynamics they engender, and it constructs a taxonomy of business models of these care platforms. By analysing the main features of their operational models, we are capable of distinguishing three main types of platforms: marketplace, on‐demand, and digital placement agencies. First, the paper argues that the distinctive features of each digital platform business model have differentiated impacts on working conditions in terms of access to tasks, remuneration, flexibility and means of control. This differentiation allows us to understand what is transformative and what is continuous in platforms' precarization or formalisation of care work and working conditions of carers, mainly women and migrants. Each business model has its differentiated outcomes in terms of labour control and reorganization of women's and migrants' reproductive work. Second, more broadly, while digital care platforms may have contributed to facilitating workers' access to jobs, reducing transaction costs and standardising processes, this has often been through the creation of more flexible and insecure forms of work and to increased market pressures. Therefore, this study contributes to existing research addressing the degree of formalization of labour relations in digital platform work through a nuanced analysis of their business models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13243\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,数字劳动平台的激增导致越来越多经济活动的商业模式和劳动关系发生了转变,其中包括高度女性化和非正规的传统行业,如护理和家政工作。本研究通过对西班牙 37 个数字护理平台的分析,比较了这些平台的显著特征和结构性权力动态,并对这些护理平台的商业模式进行了分类。通过分析其运营模式的主要特点,我们能够区分出三种主要的平台类型:市场平台、按需平台和数字安置机构。首先,本文认为,每种数字平台业务模式的显著特点都对工作条件产生了不同的影响,包括获得任务的机会、报酬、灵活性和控制手段。这种差异化使我们能够理解,在平台对护理工作和护理人员(主要是妇女和移民)的工作条件进行前置化或正规化的过程中,哪些是变革性的,哪些是持续性的。每种商业模式在劳动力控制以及妇女和移民生育工作重组方面都有其不同的结果。其次,更广泛地说,虽然数字护理平台可能有助于促进工人获得工作、降低交易成本和实现流程标准化,但这往往是通过创造更加灵活和不安全的工作形式以及增加市场压力来实现的。因此,本研究通过对数字平台的商业模式进行细致分析,为现有研究数字平台工作中劳动关系的正规化程度做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A taxonomy of business models of digital care platforms in Spain
In the last few years, the proliferation of digital labour platforms has led to the transformation of business models and labour relations in an increasing number of economic activities, including highly feminized and informal traditional sectors, such as care and domestic work. Drawing on an analysis of 37 digital care platforms in Spain, this research compares the distinctive features and structural power dynamics they engender, and it constructs a taxonomy of business models of these care platforms. By analysing the main features of their operational models, we are capable of distinguishing three main types of platforms: marketplace, on‐demand, and digital placement agencies. First, the paper argues that the distinctive features of each digital platform business model have differentiated impacts on working conditions in terms of access to tasks, remuneration, flexibility and means of control. This differentiation allows us to understand what is transformative and what is continuous in platforms' precarization or formalisation of care work and working conditions of carers, mainly women and migrants. Each business model has its differentiated outcomes in terms of labour control and reorganization of women's and migrants' reproductive work. Second, more broadly, while digital care platforms may have contributed to facilitating workers' access to jobs, reducing transaction costs and standardising processes, this has often been through the creation of more flexible and insecure forms of work and to increased market pressures. Therefore, this study contributes to existing research addressing the degree of formalization of labour relations in digital platform work through a nuanced analysis of their business models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
Critical Challenges to the Sociology of Work: From a Perspective of Russian Labor Studies Visual Analysis and the Contentious Politics of the Radical Right Caring Technologies: Confronting Invisible Work in Digital Capitalism Unlocking the Potential of the Decolonial Approach in Migration Studies Everyday Conversations About Economic Inequality: A Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1