青少年篮球运动中的头部接触和疑似脑震荡发生率:是时候针对头部接触处罚进行预防了。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1097/JSM.0000000000001249
Christy J Fehr, Stephen W West, Brent E Hagel, Claude Goulet, Carolyn A Emery
{"title":"青少年篮球运动中的头部接触和疑似脑震荡发生率:是时候针对头部接触处罚进行预防了。","authors":"Christy J Fehr, Stephen W West, Brent E Hagel, Claude Goulet, Carolyn A Emery","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare game events, head contact (HC) rates, and suspected concussion incidence rates (IRs) in boys' and girls' youth basketball.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canadian club basketball teams (U16-U18).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Players from 24 boys' and 24 girls' Canadian club basketball teams during the 2022 season.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk factors: </strong>Recorded games were analyzed using Dartfish video analysis software to compare sexes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Poisson regression analyses were used to estimate HCs [direct (HC1) and indirect (HC2)], suspected concussion IRs, and IR ratios (IRRs). Game event, court location, and HC1 fouls were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Division 1 HC rates did not differ between boys (n = 238; IR = 0.50/10 player-minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.56) and girls (n = 220; IR = 0.46/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52). Division 2 boys experienced 252 HCs (IR = 0.53/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.46-0.59); girls experienced 192 HCs (IR = 0.40/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.35-0.46). Division 2 boys sustained higher HC1 IRs compared with Division 2 girls (IRR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.74). Head contacts, rates did not differ between boys and girls in either Division. Suspected concussion IRs were not significantly different for boys and girls in each Division. Head contacts occurred mostly in the key for boys and girls in each Division. Despite illegality, HC1 penalization ranged from 3.9% to 19.7%. Head contact mechanisms varied across Divisions and sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite current safety measures, both HCs and suspected concussions occur in boys' and girls' basketball. Despite the illegality and potential danger associated with HC, only a small proportion of direct HCs were penalized and therefore targeting greater enforcement of these contacts may be a promising prevention target.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Head Contact and Suspected Concussion Rates in Youth Basketball: Time to Target Head Contact Penalties for Prevention.\",\"authors\":\"Christy J Fehr, Stephen W West, Brent E Hagel, Claude Goulet, Carolyn A Emery\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare game events, head contact (HC) rates, and suspected concussion incidence rates (IRs) in boys' and girls' youth basketball.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canadian club basketball teams (U16-U18).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Players from 24 boys' and 24 girls' Canadian club basketball teams during the 2022 season.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk factors: </strong>Recorded games were analyzed using Dartfish video analysis software to compare sexes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Poisson regression analyses were used to estimate HCs [direct (HC1) and indirect (HC2)], suspected concussion IRs, and IR ratios (IRRs). Game event, court location, and HC1 fouls were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Division 1 HC rates did not differ between boys (n = 238; IR = 0.50/10 player-minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.56) and girls (n = 220; IR = 0.46/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52). Division 2 boys experienced 252 HCs (IR = 0.53/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.46-0.59); girls experienced 192 HCs (IR = 0.40/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.35-0.46). Division 2 boys sustained higher HC1 IRs compared with Division 2 girls (IRR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.74). Head contacts, rates did not differ between boys and girls in either Division. Suspected concussion IRs were not significantly different for boys and girls in each Division. Head contacts occurred mostly in the key for boys and girls in each Division. Despite illegality, HC1 penalization ranged from 3.9% to 19.7%. Head contact mechanisms varied across Divisions and sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite current safety measures, both HCs and suspected concussions occur in boys' and girls' basketball. Despite the illegality and potential danger associated with HC, only a small proportion of direct HCs were penalized and therefore targeting greater enforcement of these contacts may be a promising prevention target.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001249\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较男孩和女孩青少年篮球比赛中的比赛事件、头部接触率(HC)和疑似脑震荡发生率(IR):比较男子和女子青少年篮球比赛中的比赛事件、头部接触率(HC)和疑似脑震荡发生率(IR):设计:横断面:参与者:加拿大篮球俱乐部球队(U16-U18):评估风险因素:使用Dartfish视频分析软件对录制的比赛进行分析,以比较性别:泊松回归分析用于估计HCs[直接(HC1)和间接(HC2)]、疑似脑震荡IRs和IR比率(IRRs)。报告了比赛事件、球场位置和 HC1 犯规情况:第一组男孩(n = 238;IR = 0.50/10名球员-分钟;95%置信区间 [CI],0.43-0.56)和女孩(n = 220;IR = 0.46/10名球员-分钟;95%置信区间,0.40-0.52)的脑震荡发生率没有差异。第 2 组男生经历了 252 次高频干扰(IR = 0.53/10,球员-分钟;95% CI,0.46-0.59);女生经历了 192 次高频干扰(IR = 0.40/10,球员-分钟;95% CI,0.35-0.46)。与第二组女生相比,第二组男生的头部接触次数更高(IRR = 1.42;95% CI,1.15-1.74)。两个分区的男孩和女孩的头部接触率没有差异。各分区男女生的疑似脑震荡 IR 没有明显差异。各分区男女生的头部接触大多发生在关键部位。尽管不合法,但HC1的处罚率从3.9%到19.7%不等。不同分区和性别的头部接触机制各不相同:尽管采取了现行的安全措施,但在男子和女子篮球比赛中仍会发生头部接触和疑似脑震荡。尽管头部接触具有非法性和潜在危险性,但只有一小部分直接头部接触受到处罚,因此加大对这些接触的执法力度可能是一个很有前景的预防目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Head Contact and Suspected Concussion Rates in Youth Basketball: Time to Target Head Contact Penalties for Prevention.

Objective: To compare game events, head contact (HC) rates, and suspected concussion incidence rates (IRs) in boys' and girls' youth basketball.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Canadian club basketball teams (U16-U18).

Participants: Players from 24 boys' and 24 girls' Canadian club basketball teams during the 2022 season.

Assessment of risk factors: Recorded games were analyzed using Dartfish video analysis software to compare sexes.

Main outcome measures: Poisson regression analyses were used to estimate HCs [direct (HC1) and indirect (HC2)], suspected concussion IRs, and IR ratios (IRRs). Game event, court location, and HC1 fouls were reported.

Results: Division 1 HC rates did not differ between boys (n = 238; IR = 0.50/10 player-minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.56) and girls (n = 220; IR = 0.46/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52). Division 2 boys experienced 252 HCs (IR = 0.53/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.46-0.59); girls experienced 192 HCs (IR = 0.40/10 player-minutes; 95% CI, 0.35-0.46). Division 2 boys sustained higher HC1 IRs compared with Division 2 girls (IRR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.74). Head contacts, rates did not differ between boys and girls in either Division. Suspected concussion IRs were not significantly different for boys and girls in each Division. Head contacts occurred mostly in the key for boys and girls in each Division. Despite illegality, HC1 penalization ranged from 3.9% to 19.7%. Head contact mechanisms varied across Divisions and sexes.

Conclusions: Despite current safety measures, both HCs and suspected concussions occur in boys' and girls' basketball. Despite the illegality and potential danger associated with HC, only a small proportion of direct HCs were penalized and therefore targeting greater enforcement of these contacts may be a promising prevention target.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
期刊最新文献
Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Sex of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool Symptom Inventory. Identifying Preferences for Exercise and Sport in Australians With Mild Multiple Sclerosis: Looking Beyond Clinical Characteristics when Implementing Exercise Interventions. Fasciotomy for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Deep Posterior Lower Leg Compartment: A Prospective Study. Platelet-Poor Plasma for the Treatment of Acute Hamstring Muscle Injuries in Collegiate Football Athletes: A Cohort Study. Examination of Sex Differences in Energy Availability, Disordered Eating, and Compulsive Exercise Among Male and Female Adolescent Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1