社会社区团队通过与利益相关者的边界工作和游戏创建服务整合。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7624
Martian Slagter, Marjolein Van Offenbeek, Manda Broekhuis
{"title":"社会社区团队通过与利益相关者的边界工作和游戏创建服务整合。","authors":"Martian Slagter, Marjolein Van Offenbeek, Manda Broekhuis","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many European countries, responsibilities for social care have been shifted to municipalities to enhance accessibility and stimulate integration of care and social services, and to cut costs. Multidisciplinary local Social Community Teams (SCTs) have become increasingly responsible for the provision of these integrated services, requiring them to collaborate with local health and societal organisations. To collaborate and to integrate services the SCTs must work across their own and stakeholders' boundaries (e.g., domain specific boundaries). We investigated how boundary work in SCTs' practices contributes to service integration in a dynamic multi-stakeholder context. In our embedded case study, for 18 months, we followed three SCTs in their efforts to integrate services, and used data from multiple sources, including bi-weekly questionnaires in which SCT members reflect on their stakeholder-directed goal achievements. The case analysis yielded four takeaways. First, it demonstrates how SCTs' bottom-up formulation of a long-term service integration vision brought internal coherence (boundary reinforcement), while the short-term action-goals increased collaboration with stakeholders (boundary spanning). Second, only SCTs that managed to incorporate constraints into their action-goals and practices, and to span and play with boundaries, continued with integrating services just-by-doing. Third, two stakeholder characteristics facilitated the SCTs' boundary spanning: well-organized stakeholders and prior familiarity with the stakeholder. Fourth, a new boundary work type emerged, \"boundary play\", consisting of informal, experimental collaboration efforts with stakeholders contributing to emergent service integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Community Teams' Creation of Service Integration Through Boundary Work and Play with Their Stakeholders.\",\"authors\":\"Martian Slagter, Marjolein Van Offenbeek, Manda Broekhuis\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijic.7624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In many European countries, responsibilities for social care have been shifted to municipalities to enhance accessibility and stimulate integration of care and social services, and to cut costs. Multidisciplinary local Social Community Teams (SCTs) have become increasingly responsible for the provision of these integrated services, requiring them to collaborate with local health and societal organisations. To collaborate and to integrate services the SCTs must work across their own and stakeholders' boundaries (e.g., domain specific boundaries). We investigated how boundary work in SCTs' practices contributes to service integration in a dynamic multi-stakeholder context. In our embedded case study, for 18 months, we followed three SCTs in their efforts to integrate services, and used data from multiple sources, including bi-weekly questionnaires in which SCT members reflect on their stakeholder-directed goal achievements. The case analysis yielded four takeaways. First, it demonstrates how SCTs' bottom-up formulation of a long-term service integration vision brought internal coherence (boundary reinforcement), while the short-term action-goals increased collaboration with stakeholders (boundary spanning). Second, only SCTs that managed to incorporate constraints into their action-goals and practices, and to span and play with boundaries, continued with integrating services just-by-doing. Third, two stakeholder characteristics facilitated the SCTs' boundary spanning: well-organized stakeholders and prior familiarity with the stakeholder. Fourth, a new boundary work type emerged, \\\"boundary play\\\", consisting of informal, experimental collaboration efforts with stakeholders contributing to emergent service integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225598/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多欧洲国家,社会护理的责任已转移到市政当局,以提高可及性,促进护理和社会服务的整合,并降低成本。多学科地方社会社区团队(SCTs)越来越多地负责提供这些综合服务,要求他们与地方卫生和社会组织合作。为了开展合作和整合服务,社会社区小组必须跨越自身和利益相关者的边界(如特定领域的边界)开展工作。我们研究了在动态的多方利益相关者背景下,小规模医院在实践中的边界工作是如何促进服务整合的。在为期 18 个月的嵌入式案例研究中,我们跟踪了三个小规模团队整合服务的过程,并使用了多种来源的数据,包括小规模团队成员反思其利益相关者导向目标实现情况的双周调查问卷。案例分析得出了四点启示。首先,它展示了小规模团队如何自下而上地制定长期服务整合愿景,从而实现内部协调一致(边界强化),同时短期行动目标又如何加强与利益相关者的合作(边界跨越)。其次,只有那些能够将制约因素纳入其行动目标和实践中,并跨越和利用边界的小规模国 家工作队才会继续 "只做不说 "地整合服务。第三,利益相关者的两个特点促进了小规模团 体的边界跨越:组织良好的利益相关者和事先熟悉利益相关者。第四,出现了一种新的边界工作类型,即 "边界游戏",包括与利益相关者进行非正式的、试验性的合作,以促进新出现的服务整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Community Teams' Creation of Service Integration Through Boundary Work and Play with Their Stakeholders.

In many European countries, responsibilities for social care have been shifted to municipalities to enhance accessibility and stimulate integration of care and social services, and to cut costs. Multidisciplinary local Social Community Teams (SCTs) have become increasingly responsible for the provision of these integrated services, requiring them to collaborate with local health and societal organisations. To collaborate and to integrate services the SCTs must work across their own and stakeholders' boundaries (e.g., domain specific boundaries). We investigated how boundary work in SCTs' practices contributes to service integration in a dynamic multi-stakeholder context. In our embedded case study, for 18 months, we followed three SCTs in their efforts to integrate services, and used data from multiple sources, including bi-weekly questionnaires in which SCT members reflect on their stakeholder-directed goal achievements. The case analysis yielded four takeaways. First, it demonstrates how SCTs' bottom-up formulation of a long-term service integration vision brought internal coherence (boundary reinforcement), while the short-term action-goals increased collaboration with stakeholders (boundary spanning). Second, only SCTs that managed to incorporate constraints into their action-goals and practices, and to span and play with boundaries, continued with integrating services just-by-doing. Third, two stakeholder characteristics facilitated the SCTs' boundary spanning: well-organized stakeholders and prior familiarity with the stakeholder. Fourth, a new boundary work type emerged, "boundary play", consisting of informal, experimental collaboration efforts with stakeholders contributing to emergent service integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
期刊最新文献
The Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework: An Innovative and Rigorous Set of Methods to Evaluate Integrated Care Programs. Reimagining Day Rehabilitation For Frailty and Neurodegenerative Conditions through the integrated Rehabilitation and EnAblement Program (iREAP). Integrated Diagnosis in Africa's Low- and Middle-Income Countries: What Is It, What Works, and for Whom? A Realist Synthesis. Scale-Up of Integrated Care Interventions for Chronic Diseases in Diverse Settings. Assessing the Strengths and Weaknesses for Implementing a Place-Based Model of Care for Older People on the Central Coast, Australia: Results of a Pilot Project Using the Population Health Management Maturity Index (PHM-MI) Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1