卵巢癌的诊断和治疗时间及其与预后的关系:系统综述。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2023.1160
Rebecca J Bergin, Deirdre O'Sullivan, Suzanne Dixon-Suen, Jon D Emery, Dallas R English, Roger L Milne, Victoria M White
{"title":"卵巢癌的诊断和治疗时间及其与预后的关系:系统综述。","authors":"Rebecca J Bergin, Deirdre O'Sullivan, Suzanne Dixon-Suen, Jon D Emery, Dallas R English, Roger L Milne, Victoria M White","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed symptomatically at an advanced stage. Better survival for early disease suggests improving diagnostic pathways may increase survival. This study examines literature assessing diagnostic intervals and their association with clinical and psychological outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Medline, EMBASE, and EmCare databases were searched for studies including quantitative measures of at least one interval, published between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2022. Interval measures and associations (interval, outcomes, analytic strategy) were synthesized. Risk of bias of association studies was assessed using the Aarhus Checklist and ROBINS-E tool. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 65 papers (20 association studies) were included and 26 unique intervals were identified. Interval estimates varied widely and were impacted by summary statistic used (mean or median) and group focused on. Of Aarhus-defined intervals, patient (symptom to presentation, <i>n</i> = 23; range [median]: 7-168 days) and diagnostic (presentation to diagnosis, <i>n</i> = 22; range [median]: 7-270 days) were most common. Nineteen association studies examined survival or stage outcomes with most, including five low risk-of-bias studies, finding no association. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Studies reporting intervals for ovarian cancer diagnosis are limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Greater utilization of the Aarhus statement to define intervals and appropriate analytic methods is needed to strengthen findings from future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"1185-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Ovarian Cancer and Associations with Outcomes: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca J Bergin, Deirdre O'Sullivan, Suzanne Dixon-Suen, Jon D Emery, Dallas R English, Roger L Milne, Victoria M White\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2023.1160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed symptomatically at an advanced stage. Better survival for early disease suggests improving diagnostic pathways may increase survival. This study examines literature assessing diagnostic intervals and their association with clinical and psychological outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Medline, EMBASE, and EmCare databases were searched for studies including quantitative measures of at least one interval, published between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2022. Interval measures and associations (interval, outcomes, analytic strategy) were synthesized. Risk of bias of association studies was assessed using the Aarhus Checklist and ROBINS-E tool. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 65 papers (20 association studies) were included and 26 unique intervals were identified. Interval estimates varied widely and were impacted by summary statistic used (mean or median) and group focused on. Of Aarhus-defined intervals, patient (symptom to presentation, <i>n</i> = 23; range [median]: 7-168 days) and diagnostic (presentation to diagnosis, <i>n</i> = 22; range [median]: 7-270 days) were most common. Nineteen association studies examined survival or stage outcomes with most, including five low risk-of-bias studies, finding no association. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Studies reporting intervals for ovarian cancer diagnosis are limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Greater utilization of the Aarhus statement to define intervals and appropriate analytic methods is needed to strengthen findings from future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1185-1197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卵巢癌通常在晚期才被诊断出症状。早期疾病的生存率较高,这表明改善诊断途径可提高生存率。本研究对评估诊断间隔及其与临床和心理结果的关系的文献进行了研究。研究方法在 Medline、EMBASE 和 EmCare 数据库中检索了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 9 日期间发表的研究,其中至少包括一项间期的定量测量。对区间测量和关联(区间、结果、分析策略)进行了综合。使用奥胡斯检查表和 ROBINS-E 工具评估了关联研究的偏倚风险。结果共纳入 65 篇论文(20 项关联研究),确定了 26 个独特的区间。区间估计值差异很大,并受到所用汇总统计量(平均值或中位数)和所关注群体的影响。在奥胡斯定义的时间间隔中,最常见的是患者间隔(从症状到发病,n = 23;范围[中位数]:7-168 天)和诊断间隔(从发病到诊断,n = 22;范围[中位数]:7-270 天)。19 项关联研究对生存或分期结果进行了检查,其中大多数研究(包括 5 项低偏倚风险研究)发现两者之间没有关联。结论:报告卵巢癌诊断时间间隔的研究因定义和报告不一致而受到限制。需要更多地利用奥胡斯声明来定义间隔期和适当的分析方法,以加强未来研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Ovarian Cancer and Associations with Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Background: Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed symptomatically at an advanced stage. Better survival for early disease suggests improving diagnostic pathways may increase survival. This study examines literature assessing diagnostic intervals and their association with clinical and psychological outcomes. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and EmCare databases were searched for studies including quantitative measures of at least one interval, published between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2022. Interval measures and associations (interval, outcomes, analytic strategy) were synthesized. Risk of bias of association studies was assessed using the Aarhus Checklist and ROBINS-E tool. Results: In total, 65 papers (20 association studies) were included and 26 unique intervals were identified. Interval estimates varied widely and were impacted by summary statistic used (mean or median) and group focused on. Of Aarhus-defined intervals, patient (symptom to presentation, n = 23; range [median]: 7-168 days) and diagnostic (presentation to diagnosis, n = 22; range [median]: 7-270 days) were most common. Nineteen association studies examined survival or stage outcomes with most, including five low risk-of-bias studies, finding no association. Conclusions: Studies reporting intervals for ovarian cancer diagnosis are limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Greater utilization of the Aarhus statement to define intervals and appropriate analytic methods is needed to strengthen findings from future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and Experiences Regarding Communication About Maternal Vaccination: Qualitative Findings from Non-Hispanic Black Pregnant People. Oncofertility Research: A Review of the Literature. Self-Management Interventions for Black Women at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Gender Differences in "Making Weight" Behaviors Among U.S. Iraq and Afghan War Veterans: Implications for Future Health. Maternal Postpartum Readmission for Hypertension-Quality Metric or Call for Action?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1