手术治疗的单灶和多灶肺腺癌中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和 KRAS 突变的临床影响。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2024-06-30 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-165
Jiahao Jiang, Mark F Berry, Natalie S Lui, Douglas Z Liou, Winston L Trope, Leah M Backhus, Joseph B Shrager
{"title":"手术治疗的单灶和多灶肺腺癌中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和 KRAS 突变的临床影响。","authors":"Jiahao Jiang, Mark F Berry, Natalie S Lui, Douglas Z Liou, Winston L Trope, Leah M Backhus, Joseph B Shrager","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) are the two most common oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma, and their roles still need further exploration. Here we aimed to compare the clinical impact of <i>EGFR</i> and <i>KRAS</i> mutations on disease progression in resected unifocal and multifocal lung adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected for patients who underwent resection of lung adenocarcinoma from 2008 to 2022 at Stanford University Hospital. Retrospective review was performed in 241 patients whose tumors harbored <i>EGFR</i> (n=150, 62.2%) or <i>KRAS</i> (n=91, 37.8%) mutations. Clinical outcome was analyzed with special attention to the natural history of secondary nodules in multifocal cases wherein the dominant tumor had been resected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirm that compared with <i>EGFR</i> mutations, patients with <i>KRAS</i> mutations had more smokers, larger tumor size, higher TNM stage, higher positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) standard uptake value max, higher tumor mutation burden, and worse disease-free survival and overall survival on univariate analysis. For patients with multifocal pulmonary nodules, the median follow-up of unresected secondary nodules was 55 months. Secondary nodule progression-free survival (SNPFS) was significantly worse for patients with <i>KRAS</i> mutations than those with <i>EGFR</i> mutations (mean 40.3±6.6 <i>vs.</i> 67.7±6.5 months, P=0.004). Univariate analysis showed tumor size, tumor morphology, pathologic TNM stage, and <i>KRAS</i> mutations were significantly associated with SNPFS, while multivariate analysis showed only <i>KRAS</i> mutations were independently associated with worse SNPFS (hazard ratio 1.752, 95% confidence interval: 1.017-3.018, P=0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resected lung adenocarcinomas with <i>KRAS</i> mutations have more aggressive clinicopathological features and confer worse prognosis than those with <i>EGFR</i> mutations. Secondary pulmonary nodules in multifocal cases with dominant <i>KRAS</i>-mutant tumors have more rapid progression of the secondary nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of <i>EGFR</i> and <i>KRAS</i> mutations in surgically treated unifocal and multifocal lung adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Jiahao Jiang, Mark F Berry, Natalie S Lui, Douglas Z Liou, Winston L Trope, Leah M Backhus, Joseph B Shrager\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tlcr-24-165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) are the two most common oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma, and their roles still need further exploration. Here we aimed to compare the clinical impact of <i>EGFR</i> and <i>KRAS</i> mutations on disease progression in resected unifocal and multifocal lung adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected for patients who underwent resection of lung adenocarcinoma from 2008 to 2022 at Stanford University Hospital. Retrospective review was performed in 241 patients whose tumors harbored <i>EGFR</i> (n=150, 62.2%) or <i>KRAS</i> (n=91, 37.8%) mutations. Clinical outcome was analyzed with special attention to the natural history of secondary nodules in multifocal cases wherein the dominant tumor had been resected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirm that compared with <i>EGFR</i> mutations, patients with <i>KRAS</i> mutations had more smokers, larger tumor size, higher TNM stage, higher positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) standard uptake value max, higher tumor mutation burden, and worse disease-free survival and overall survival on univariate analysis. For patients with multifocal pulmonary nodules, the median follow-up of unresected secondary nodules was 55 months. Secondary nodule progression-free survival (SNPFS) was significantly worse for patients with <i>KRAS</i> mutations than those with <i>EGFR</i> mutations (mean 40.3±6.6 <i>vs.</i> 67.7±6.5 months, P=0.004). Univariate analysis showed tumor size, tumor morphology, pathologic TNM stage, and <i>KRAS</i> mutations were significantly associated with SNPFS, while multivariate analysis showed only <i>KRAS</i> mutations were independently associated with worse SNPFS (hazard ratio 1.752, 95% confidence interval: 1.017-3.018, P=0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resected lung adenocarcinomas with <i>KRAS</i> mutations have more aggressive clinicopathological features and confer worse prognosis than those with <i>EGFR</i> mutations. Secondary pulmonary nodules in multifocal cases with dominant <i>KRAS</i>-mutant tumors have more rapid progression of the secondary nodules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-165\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和克氏鼠肉瘤(KRAS)是肺腺癌中两种最常见的致癌因子,它们的作用仍需进一步探讨。在此,我们旨在比较EGFR和KRAS突变对切除的单灶和多灶肺腺癌疾病进展的临床影响:收集了2008年至2022年期间在斯坦福大学医院接受肺腺癌切除术的患者的临床病理和基因组数据。对241例肿瘤携带表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)(150例,62.2%)或KRAS(91例,37.8%)突变的患者进行了回顾性分析。对临床结果进行了分析,特别关注了多灶病例中继发性结节的自然病史,其中主要肿瘤已被切除:结果:我们证实,与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变相比,KRAS突变患者吸烟人数更多,肿瘤体积更大,TNM分期更高,正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)标准摄取值最大值更高,肿瘤突变负荷更高,单变量分析显示无病生存率和总生存率更低。对于多灶性肺结节患者,未切除继发性结节的中位随访时间为55个月。KRAS突变患者的继发性结节无进展生存期(SNPFS)明显低于EGFR突变患者(平均40.3±6.6个月 vs. 67.7±6.5个月,P=0.004)。单变量分析显示肿瘤大小、肿瘤形态、病理TNM分期和KRAS突变与SNPFS显著相关,而多变量分析显示只有KRAS突变与较差的SNPFS独立相关(危险比1.752,95%置信区间:1.017-3.018,P=0.043):结论:与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的肺腺癌相比,切除的KRAS突变的肺腺癌临床病理特征更具侵袭性,预后更差。KRAS突变显性多灶病例的继发性肺结节进展更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical impact of EGFR and KRAS mutations in surgically treated unifocal and multifocal lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) are the two most common oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma, and their roles still need further exploration. Here we aimed to compare the clinical impact of EGFR and KRAS mutations on disease progression in resected unifocal and multifocal lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods: Clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected for patients who underwent resection of lung adenocarcinoma from 2008 to 2022 at Stanford University Hospital. Retrospective review was performed in 241 patients whose tumors harbored EGFR (n=150, 62.2%) or KRAS (n=91, 37.8%) mutations. Clinical outcome was analyzed with special attention to the natural history of secondary nodules in multifocal cases wherein the dominant tumor had been resected.

Results: We confirm that compared with EGFR mutations, patients with KRAS mutations had more smokers, larger tumor size, higher TNM stage, higher positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) standard uptake value max, higher tumor mutation burden, and worse disease-free survival and overall survival on univariate analysis. For patients with multifocal pulmonary nodules, the median follow-up of unresected secondary nodules was 55 months. Secondary nodule progression-free survival (SNPFS) was significantly worse for patients with KRAS mutations than those with EGFR mutations (mean 40.3±6.6 vs. 67.7±6.5 months, P=0.004). Univariate analysis showed tumor size, tumor morphology, pathologic TNM stage, and KRAS mutations were significantly associated with SNPFS, while multivariate analysis showed only KRAS mutations were independently associated with worse SNPFS (hazard ratio 1.752, 95% confidence interval: 1.017-3.018, P=0.043).

Conclusions: Resected lung adenocarcinomas with KRAS mutations have more aggressive clinicopathological features and confer worse prognosis than those with EGFR mutations. Secondary pulmonary nodules in multifocal cases with dominant KRAS-mutant tumors have more rapid progression of the secondary nodules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
LungPath: artificial intelligence-driven histologic pattern recognition for improved diagnosis of early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma. A nomogram predicting the risk of extrathoracic metastasis at initial diagnosis of T≤3cmN0 lung cancer. Are PD-1T TILs merely an expensive and unuseful whim as biomarker? Assessing the transportability of radiomic models for lung cancer diagnosis: commercial vs. open-source feature extractors. Breaking barriers: patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in lung cancer drug development-are we close to the finish line?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1