低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图检查

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2024.06.017
{"title":"低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图检查","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><div>Guidelines recommend the use of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt;50%. However, a paucity of DSE data exists when LVEF &gt;35%.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the diagnostic accuracy of DSE in patients with low-gradient AS with a wide range of LVEF and to examine the interaction between the diagnostic accuracy of DSE and LVEF.</div></div><div><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><div>Patients with mean gradient &lt;40 mm Hg, aortic valve area &lt;1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>, and stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m<sup>2</sup> undergoing DSE and cardiac computer tomography (C-CT) were identified from 3 prospectively collected patient cohorts and stratified according to LVEF: LVEF&lt;35%, LVEF 35% to 50%, and LVEF&gt;50%.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Dobutamine stress echocardiography and C-CT were performed on patients with low-gradient AS.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><div>Severe AS was defined as aortic valve calcification score ≥2,000 arbitrary units (AU) among men and ≥1,200 AU for women on C-CT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 221 patients included in the study, 78 (35%) presented with LVEF &lt;35%, 67 (30%) with LVEF 35% to 50%, and 76 (34%) with LVEF &gt;50%. Mean-gradient and aortic valve peak velocity during DSE showed significant diagnostic heterogeneity between LVEF groups, being most precise when LVEF &lt;35% (both areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.90), albeit with optimal thresholds of 30 mm Hg and 377 cm/sec and a limited diagnostic yield in patients with LVEF ≥35% (AUC = 0.67 and 0.66 in LVEF 35% to 50% and AUC = 0.65 and 0.60 in LVEF ≥50%). Using guideline thresholds led to a sensitivity/specificity of 49%/84% for all patients with LVEF &lt;50%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>While DSE is safe and leads to an increase in stroke volume in patients with low-gradient AS regardless of LVEF, the association between DSE gradients and AS severity assessed by C-CT demonstrates important heterogeneity depending on LVEF, with the highest accuracy in patients with LVEF &lt;35%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":"37 11","pages":"Pages 1023-1033"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echo.2024.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Importance</h3><div>Guidelines recommend the use of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt;50%. However, a paucity of DSE data exists when LVEF &gt;35%.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the diagnostic accuracy of DSE in patients with low-gradient AS with a wide range of LVEF and to examine the interaction between the diagnostic accuracy of DSE and LVEF.</div></div><div><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><div>Patients with mean gradient &lt;40 mm Hg, aortic valve area &lt;1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>, and stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m<sup>2</sup> undergoing DSE and cardiac computer tomography (C-CT) were identified from 3 prospectively collected patient cohorts and stratified according to LVEF: LVEF&lt;35%, LVEF 35% to 50%, and LVEF&gt;50%.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Dobutamine stress echocardiography and C-CT were performed on patients with low-gradient AS.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><div>Severe AS was defined as aortic valve calcification score ≥2,000 arbitrary units (AU) among men and ≥1,200 AU for women on C-CT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 221 patients included in the study, 78 (35%) presented with LVEF &lt;35%, 67 (30%) with LVEF 35% to 50%, and 76 (34%) with LVEF &gt;50%. Mean-gradient and aortic valve peak velocity during DSE showed significant diagnostic heterogeneity between LVEF groups, being most precise when LVEF &lt;35% (both areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.90), albeit with optimal thresholds of 30 mm Hg and 377 cm/sec and a limited diagnostic yield in patients with LVEF ≥35% (AUC = 0.67 and 0.66 in LVEF 35% to 50% and AUC = 0.65 and 0.60 in LVEF ≥50%). Using guideline thresholds led to a sensitivity/specificity of 49%/84% for all patients with LVEF &lt;50%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>While DSE is safe and leads to an increase in stroke volume in patients with low-gradient AS regardless of LVEF, the association between DSE gradients and AS severity assessed by C-CT demonstrates important heterogeneity depending on LVEF, with the highest accuracy in patients with LVEF &lt;35%.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\"37 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1023-1033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731724003456\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731724003456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:指南建议在低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和左室射血分数(LVEF)为35%的患者中使用多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图(DSE):研究低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)且左心室射血分数(LVEF)范围较宽的患者的 DSE 诊断准确性,并研究 DSE 诊断准确性与 LVEF 之间的相互作用:从三个前瞻性收集的患者队列中识别出平均梯度2、卒中容积指数≤35 mL/m2、接受DSE和心脏计算机断层扫描(C-CT)的患者,并根据LVEF进行分层;LVEF50%:主要结果和测量指标:重度强直性脊柱炎的定义是:C-CT上男性的AVC评分≥2000 AU,女性的AVC评分≥1200 AU:在纳入研究的 221 名患者中,78 人(35%)的 LVEF 为 50%。DSE 期间的平均梯度和 Vmax 在 LVEF 组间显示出明显的诊断异质性,在 LVEFC 时最为精确:虽然 DSE 是安全的,而且无论 LVEF 如何,都能增加低梯度 AS 患者的搏出量,但 DSE 梯度与 C-CT 评估的 AS 严重程度之间的关联显示出重要的异质性,这取决于 LVEF,其中 LVEF 为 50% 的患者的诊断准确性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Importance

Guidelines recommend the use of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. However, a paucity of DSE data exists when LVEF >35%.

Objective

To examine the diagnostic accuracy of DSE in patients with low-gradient AS with a wide range of LVEF and to examine the interaction between the diagnostic accuracy of DSE and LVEF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients with mean gradient <40 mm Hg, aortic valve area <1.0 cm2, and stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m2 undergoing DSE and cardiac computer tomography (C-CT) were identified from 3 prospectively collected patient cohorts and stratified according to LVEF: LVEF<35%, LVEF 35% to 50%, and LVEF>50%.

Exposure

Dobutamine stress echocardiography and C-CT were performed on patients with low-gradient AS.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Severe AS was defined as aortic valve calcification score ≥2,000 arbitrary units (AU) among men and ≥1,200 AU for women on C-CT.

Results

Of 221 patients included in the study, 78 (35%) presented with LVEF <35%, 67 (30%) with LVEF 35% to 50%, and 76 (34%) with LVEF >50%. Mean-gradient and aortic valve peak velocity during DSE showed significant diagnostic heterogeneity between LVEF groups, being most precise when LVEF <35% (both areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.90), albeit with optimal thresholds of 30 mm Hg and 377 cm/sec and a limited diagnostic yield in patients with LVEF ≥35% (AUC = 0.67 and 0.66 in LVEF 35% to 50% and AUC = 0.65 and 0.60 in LVEF ≥50%). Using guideline thresholds led to a sensitivity/specificity of 49%/84% for all patients with LVEF <50%.

Conclusion and Relevance

While DSE is safe and leads to an increase in stroke volume in patients with low-gradient AS regardless of LVEF, the association between DSE gradients and AS severity assessed by C-CT demonstrates important heterogeneity depending on LVEF, with the highest accuracy in patients with LVEF <35%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
期刊最新文献
Systolic Function in the Fontan Circulation is Exercise, but not Preload, Recruitable. Height-Based Pediatric Echocardiogram Z-Scores are Valid in Patients with Normal Body Mass Index and May be Advantageous in Obese Patients. Mitral Annular Disjunction: An Approximation to the Truth. Machine Learning Identifies Clinically Distinct Phenotypes in Patients with Aortic Regurgitation. Sleep duration and subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1