冠状动脉搭桥手术患者移植失败后 1 年随访的预防性药物疗效:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052
Mikko Uimonen, Rasmus Liukkonen, Ville Ponkilainen, Matias Vaajala, Jeremias Tarkiainen, Oskari Pakarinen, Marjut Haapanen, Ilari Kuitunen
{"title":"冠状动脉搭桥手术患者移植失败后 1 年随访的预防性药物疗效:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Mikko Uimonen, Rasmus Liukkonen, Ville Ponkilainen, Matias Vaajala, Jeremias Tarkiainen, Oskari Pakarinen, Marjut Haapanen, Ilari Kuitunen","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare preventive medications against graft failures in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients after a 1-year follow-up. Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in February 2023 for randomized controlled trials, comparing preventive medications against graft failure in CABG patients. We included studies that reported outcomes at 1 year after surgery. Our primary outcome was graft failure After screening 11,898 studies, a total of 18 randomized trials were included. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) [odds ratios (OR) 0.51, 95% credibility interval (CrI) 0.28-0.95, meta-regression OR 0.54, 95% CrI 0.26-1.00], Clopidogrel + ASA (OR 0.27, 95% CrI 0.09-0.76, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.09-0.85), dipyridamole + ASA (OR 0.50, 95% CrI 0.30-0.83, meta-regression OR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.26-0.90), ticagrelor (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.16-1.00, meta-regression OR 0.43, 95% CrI 0.15-1.2), and ticagrelor + ASA (OR 0.26, 95% CrI 0.10-0.62, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.10-0.68) were superior to placebo in preventing graft failure. Rank probabilities suggested the highest likelihood to be the most efficacious for ticagrelor + ASA [surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) 0.859] and clopidogrel + ASA (SUCRA 0.819). The 95% CrIs of ORs for mortality, bleeding, and major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACE) were wide. A trend towards increased bleeding risk and decreased MACE risk was observed when any of the medication regimens were used when compared to placebo. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a high risk of bias yielded equivalent results. Of the reviewed medication regimens, dual antiplatelet therapy combining ASA with ticagrelor or clopidogrel was found to result in the lowest rate of graft failures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 4","pages":"oeae052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventive medication efficacy after 1-year follow-up for graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: Bayesian network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mikko Uimonen, Rasmus Liukkonen, Ville Ponkilainen, Matias Vaajala, Jeremias Tarkiainen, Oskari Pakarinen, Marjut Haapanen, Ilari Kuitunen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To compare preventive medications against graft failures in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients after a 1-year follow-up. Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in February 2023 for randomized controlled trials, comparing preventive medications against graft failure in CABG patients. We included studies that reported outcomes at 1 year after surgery. Our primary outcome was graft failure After screening 11,898 studies, a total of 18 randomized trials were included. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) [odds ratios (OR) 0.51, 95% credibility interval (CrI) 0.28-0.95, meta-regression OR 0.54, 95% CrI 0.26-1.00], Clopidogrel + ASA (OR 0.27, 95% CrI 0.09-0.76, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.09-0.85), dipyridamole + ASA (OR 0.50, 95% CrI 0.30-0.83, meta-regression OR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.26-0.90), ticagrelor (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.16-1.00, meta-regression OR 0.43, 95% CrI 0.15-1.2), and ticagrelor + ASA (OR 0.26, 95% CrI 0.10-0.62, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.10-0.68) were superior to placebo in preventing graft failure. Rank probabilities suggested the highest likelihood to be the most efficacious for ticagrelor + ASA [surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) 0.859] and clopidogrel + ASA (SUCRA 0.819). The 95% CrIs of ORs for mortality, bleeding, and major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACE) were wide. A trend towards increased bleeding risk and decreased MACE risk was observed when any of the medication regimens were used when compared to placebo. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a high risk of bias yielded equivalent results. Of the reviewed medication regimens, dual antiplatelet therapy combining ASA with ticagrelor or clopidogrel was found to result in the lowest rate of graft failures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"oeae052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较冠状动脉旁路移植手术(CABG)患者 1 年随访后使用预防性药物与移植失败的情况。通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析和元回归分析进行系统综述。我们在 2023 年 2 月检索了 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中的随机对照试验,比较了预防性药物对 CABG 患者移植物治疗失败的影响。我们纳入了报告术后 1 年结果的研究。在筛选了 11,898 项研究后,我们共纳入了 18 项随机试验。其中包括:乙酰水杨酸(ASA)[几率比(OR)0.51,95% 可信区间(CrI)0.28-0.95,元回归 OR 0.54,95% CrI 0.26-1.00]、氯吡格雷 + ASA(OR 0.27,95% CrI 0.09-0.76,元回归 OR 0.28,95% CrI 0.09-0.85)、双嘧达莫 + ASA(OR 0.50,95% CrI 0.30-0.83,元回归 OR 0.28-0.85)。83,元回归 OR 0.49,95% CrI 0.26-0.90)、替卡格雷(OR 0.40,95% CrI 0.16-1.00,元回归 OR 0.43,95% CrI 0.15-1.2)和替卡格雷 + ASA(OR 0.26,95% CrI 0.10-0.62,元回归 OR 0.28,95% CrI 0.10-0.68)在预防移植失败方面优于安慰剂。排序概率表明,ticagrelor + ASA(累积排序下表面值(SUCRA)0.859)和氯吡格雷 + ASA(SUCRA 0.819)的疗效最好。死亡率、出血和主要不良心脑血管事件(MACE)ORs 的 95% CrIs 较宽。与安慰剂相比,使用任何一种药物治疗方案都有出血风险增加和 MACE 风险降低的趋势。敏感性分析排除了偏倚风险较高的研究,得出了相同的结果。在所审查的药物治疗方案中,ASA与替卡格雷或氯吡格雷联合使用的双联抗血小板疗法导致的移植物治疗失败率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preventive medication efficacy after 1-year follow-up for graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: Bayesian network meta-analysis.

To compare preventive medications against graft failures in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients after a 1-year follow-up. Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in February 2023 for randomized controlled trials, comparing preventive medications against graft failure in CABG patients. We included studies that reported outcomes at 1 year after surgery. Our primary outcome was graft failure After screening 11,898 studies, a total of 18 randomized trials were included. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) [odds ratios (OR) 0.51, 95% credibility interval (CrI) 0.28-0.95, meta-regression OR 0.54, 95% CrI 0.26-1.00], Clopidogrel + ASA (OR 0.27, 95% CrI 0.09-0.76, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.09-0.85), dipyridamole + ASA (OR 0.50, 95% CrI 0.30-0.83, meta-regression OR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.26-0.90), ticagrelor (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.16-1.00, meta-regression OR 0.43, 95% CrI 0.15-1.2), and ticagrelor + ASA (OR 0.26, 95% CrI 0.10-0.62, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.10-0.68) were superior to placebo in preventing graft failure. Rank probabilities suggested the highest likelihood to be the most efficacious for ticagrelor + ASA [surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) 0.859] and clopidogrel + ASA (SUCRA 0.819). The 95% CrIs of ORs for mortality, bleeding, and major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACE) were wide. A trend towards increased bleeding risk and decreased MACE risk was observed when any of the medication regimens were used when compared to placebo. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a high risk of bias yielded equivalent results. Of the reviewed medication regimens, dual antiplatelet therapy combining ASA with ticagrelor or clopidogrel was found to result in the lowest rate of graft failures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The acute effect of high-dose supplemental oxygen on haemodynamics assessed by echocardiography in patients with pulmonary vascular disease living in Quito at 2850 m: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Percutaneous thrombectomy with the FlowTriever for pulmonary embolism with right heart thrombi: a retrospective two centres study. Single high-sensitivity troponin-I for ruling out acute coronary syndrome: a detection limit approach. Beyond the heart: multisystem complications fuelling cardiac dysfunction in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1