人工智能与文化:对人工智能系统的文化依赖性反应

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101838
Aaron J. Barnes , Yuanyuan Zhang , Ana Valenzuela
{"title":"人工智能与文化:对人工智能系统的文化依赖性反应","authors":"Aaron J. Barnes ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ana Valenzuela","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article synthesizes recent research connected to how cultural identity can determine responses to artificial intelligence. National differences in AI adoption imply that culturally-driven psychological differences may offer a nuanced understanding and interventions. Our review suggests that cultural identity shapes how individuals include AI in constructing the self in relation to others and determines the effect of AI on key decision-making processes. Individualists may be more prone to view AI as external to the self and interpret AI features to infringe upon their uniqueness, autonomy, and privacy. In contrast, collectivists may be more prone to view AI as an extension of the self and interpret AI features to facilitate conforming to consensus, respond to their environment, and protect privacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101838"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI and culture: Culturally dependent responses to AI systems\",\"authors\":\"Aaron J. Barnes ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ana Valenzuela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article synthesizes recent research connected to how cultural identity can determine responses to artificial intelligence. National differences in AI adoption imply that culturally-driven psychological differences may offer a nuanced understanding and interventions. Our review suggests that cultural identity shapes how individuals include AI in constructing the self in relation to others and determines the effect of AI on key decision-making processes. Individualists may be more prone to view AI as external to the self and interpret AI features to infringe upon their uniqueness, autonomy, and privacy. In contrast, collectivists may be more prone to view AI as an extension of the self and interpret AI features to facilitate conforming to consensus, respond to their environment, and protect privacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101838\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000514\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了与文化认同如何决定对人工智能的反应有关的最新研究。各国在采用人工智能方面的差异意味着,由文化驱动的心理差异可能会提供细致入微的理解和干预措施。我们的综述表明,文化认同会影响个人如何将人工智能纳入构建自我与他人的关系中,并决定人工智能对关键决策过程的影响。个人主义者可能更容易将人工智能视为外在于自我的东西,并将人工智能的特征解释为对其独特性、自主性和隐私的侵犯。与此相反,集体主义者可能更倾向于将人工智能视为自我的延伸,并将人工智能的功能解释为促进服从共识、顺应环境和保护隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI and culture: Culturally dependent responses to AI systems

This article synthesizes recent research connected to how cultural identity can determine responses to artificial intelligence. National differences in AI adoption imply that culturally-driven psychological differences may offer a nuanced understanding and interventions. Our review suggests that cultural identity shapes how individuals include AI in constructing the self in relation to others and determines the effect of AI on key decision-making processes. Individualists may be more prone to view AI as external to the self and interpret AI features to infringe upon their uniqueness, autonomy, and privacy. In contrast, collectivists may be more prone to view AI as an extension of the self and interpret AI features to facilitate conforming to consensus, respond to their environment, and protect privacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
期刊最新文献
A sender-message-receiver (SMeR) framework for communicating persuasive social norms – The case of climate change mitigation behavioral change Hype-free AI: How AI actually impacts psychology in research, the workplace, the marketplace, and beyond Editorial overview: Mapping the current state of affairs and future outlook of self-control and self-regulation research: From effortful inhibition to motivated and situated strategies From perception to projection: Exploring neuroaffective advances in understanding optimism bias and belief updating Effects of personality and gender on nudgeability for mental health-related behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1