用于低密度脂蛋白胆固醇预测和分类的可解释人工智能。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110791
Sevilay Sezer , Ali Oter , Betul Ersoz , Canan Topcuoglu , Halil İbrahim Bulbul , Seref Sagiroglu , Murat Akin , Gulsen Yilmaz
{"title":"用于低密度脂蛋白胆固醇预测和分类的可解释人工智能。","authors":"Sevilay Sezer ,&nbsp;Ali Oter ,&nbsp;Betul Ersoz ,&nbsp;Canan Topcuoglu ,&nbsp;Halil İbrahim Bulbul ,&nbsp;Seref Sagiroglu ,&nbsp;Murat Akin ,&nbsp;Gulsen Yilmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Monitoring LDL-C levels is essential in clinical practice because there is a direct relation between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and atherosclerotic heart disease risk. Therefore, measurement or estimate of LDL-C is critical. The present study aims to evaluate Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Explainable AI (XAI) methodologies in predicting LDL-C levels while emphasizing the interpretability of these predictions.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed data from the Laboratory Information System (LIS) of Ankara Etlik City Hospital (AECH). We included 60.217 patients with standard lipid profiles (total cholesterol [TC], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) paired with same-day direct LDL-C results. AI methodologies, such as Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Decision Trees (DT), were used to predict LDL-C and compared directly measured and calculated LDL-C with formulas. XAI techniques such as Shapley additive annotation (SHAP) and locally interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) were used to interpret AI models and improve their explainability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Predicted LDL-C values using AI, especially RF or GB, showed a stronger correlation with direct measurement LDL-C values than calculated LDL-C values with formulas. TC was shown to be the most influential factor in LDL-C prediction using SHAP and LIME. The agreement between the treatment groups based on NCEP ATPIII guidelines according to measured LDL-C and the LDL-C groups obtained with AI was higher than that obtained with formulas.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It can be concluded that AI is not only a reliable method but also an explainable method for LDL-C estimation and classification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 110791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable artificial intelligence for LDL cholesterol prediction and classification\",\"authors\":\"Sevilay Sezer ,&nbsp;Ali Oter ,&nbsp;Betul Ersoz ,&nbsp;Canan Topcuoglu ,&nbsp;Halil İbrahim Bulbul ,&nbsp;Seref Sagiroglu ,&nbsp;Murat Akin ,&nbsp;Gulsen Yilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Monitoring LDL-C levels is essential in clinical practice because there is a direct relation between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and atherosclerotic heart disease risk. Therefore, measurement or estimate of LDL-C is critical. The present study aims to evaluate Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Explainable AI (XAI) methodologies in predicting LDL-C levels while emphasizing the interpretability of these predictions.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed data from the Laboratory Information System (LIS) of Ankara Etlik City Hospital (AECH). We included 60.217 patients with standard lipid profiles (total cholesterol [TC], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) paired with same-day direct LDL-C results. AI methodologies, such as Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Decision Trees (DT), were used to predict LDL-C and compared directly measured and calculated LDL-C with formulas. XAI techniques such as Shapley additive annotation (SHAP) and locally interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) were used to interpret AI models and improve their explainability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Predicted LDL-C values using AI, especially RF or GB, showed a stronger correlation with direct measurement LDL-C values than calculated LDL-C values with formulas. TC was shown to be the most influential factor in LDL-C prediction using SHAP and LIME. The agreement between the treatment groups based on NCEP ATPIII guidelines according to measured LDL-C and the LDL-C groups obtained with AI was higher than that obtained with formulas.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It can be concluded that AI is not only a reliable method but also an explainable method for LDL-C estimation and classification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:监测低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平在临床实践中至关重要,因为低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平与动脉粥样硬化性心脏病风险有直接关系。因此,测量或估计低密度脂蛋白胆固醇至关重要。本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)和可解释人工智能(XAI)预测 LDL-C 水平的方法,同时强调这些预测的可解释性:我们回顾性审查了安卡拉埃特里克市医院(AECH)实验室信息系统(LIS)中的数据。我们纳入了 60.217 名具有标准血脂谱(总胆固醇 [TC]、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯)和当天直接低密度脂蛋白胆固醇结果配对的患者。梯度提升 (GB)、随机森林 (RF)、支持向量机 (SVM) 和决策树 (DT) 等人工智能方法被用于预测 LDL-C,并将直接测量和计算出的 LDL-C 与公式进行了比较。XAI 技术,如 Shapley 附加注释(SHAP)和局部可解释模型-不可知论解释(LIME),被用来解释人工智能模型并提高其可解释性:结果:使用人工智能(尤其是 RF 或 GB)预测的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇值与直接测量的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇值的相关性强于使用公式计算的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇值。使用 SHAP 和 LIME 预测 LDL-C 时,TC 被证明是影响最大的因素。根据 NCEP ATPIII 指南测量的 LDL-C 治疗组与使用 AI 得出的 LDL-C 组之间的一致性高于使用公式得出的结果:结论:AI 不仅是一种可靠的方法,也是一种可解释的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇估测和分类方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explainable artificial intelligence for LDL cholesterol prediction and classification

Introduction

Monitoring LDL-C levels is essential in clinical practice because there is a direct relation between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and atherosclerotic heart disease risk. Therefore, measurement or estimate of LDL-C is critical. The present study aims to evaluate Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Explainable AI (XAI) methodologies in predicting LDL-C levels while emphasizing the interpretability of these predictions.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from the Laboratory Information System (LIS) of Ankara Etlik City Hospital (AECH). We included 60.217 patients with standard lipid profiles (total cholesterol [TC], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) paired with same-day direct LDL-C results. AI methodologies, such as Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Decision Trees (DT), were used to predict LDL-C and compared directly measured and calculated LDL-C with formulas. XAI techniques such as Shapley additive annotation (SHAP) and locally interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) were used to interpret AI models and improve their explainability.

Results

Predicted LDL-C values using AI, especially RF or GB, showed a stronger correlation with direct measurement LDL-C values than calculated LDL-C values with formulas. TC was shown to be the most influential factor in LDL-C prediction using SHAP and LIME. The agreement between the treatment groups based on NCEP ATPIII guidelines according to measured LDL-C and the LDL-C groups obtained with AI was higher than that obtained with formulas.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that AI is not only a reliable method but also an explainable method for LDL-C estimation and classification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
期刊最新文献
Establishing sustainable quality improvement in the clinical laboratory: Redesign of the total testing process and digital transformation of routine quality assurance activities. Therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam – Is dried blood spot sampling suitable? The case of a bloody mess - Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide induced colitis. The pitfalls and significance of using ratios and calculated parameters in laboratory medicine. Assessment of accuracy, clinical validity, and analytical linearity in point-of-care glucose monitoring devices for diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1