超低剂量锥形束计算机断层扫描在体外检测近端龋齿的准确性。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/dmfr/twae030
Aria Taeby, Seyyed Amir Seyyedi, Maryam Mostafavi
{"title":"超低剂量锥形束计算机断层扫描在体外检测近端龋齿的准确性。","authors":"Aria Taeby, Seyyed Amir Seyyedi, Maryam Mostafavi","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultra-low dose (ULD) cone-beam CT (CBCT) for detection of proximal caries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This in vitro study evaluated 104 molar and premolar teeth. The teeth were mounted in dry skulls and underwent CBCT with 4 protocols of high-resolution (HR), normal (NORM), ULD-HR, and ULD-NORM; 78 CBCT images were scored by 3 observers for the presence and penetration depth of caries twice with a 2-week interval using a 5-point Likert scale. The teeth were then sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope (gold standard). The 4 protocols were compared with each other and with the gold standard. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and compared by the Chi-square test (alpha = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interobserver agreement ranged from 0.5233 to 0.6034 for ULD-NORM, 0.5380 to 0.6279 for NORM, 0.5856 to 0.6300 for ULD-HR, and 0.6614 to 0.7707 for HR images. The intra-observer agreement ranged from 0.6027 to 0.8812 for ULD-HR, 0.7083 to 0.7556 for HR, 0.6076 to 0.9452 for ULD-NORM, and 0.7012 to 0.9221 for NORM images. Comparison of AUC revealed no significant difference between NORM and ULD-NORM (P > .05), or HR and ULD-HR (P > .05). The highest AUC belonged to HR (0.8529) and the lowest to NORM (0.7774).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the significant reduction in radiation dose in ULD CBCT and its acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of proximal caries, this protocol may be used for detection of proximal carious lesions and assessment of their depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"459-467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro accuracy of ultra-low dose cone-beam CT for detection of proximal caries.\",\"authors\":\"Aria Taeby, Seyyed Amir Seyyedi, Maryam Mostafavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twae030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultra-low dose (ULD) cone-beam CT (CBCT) for detection of proximal caries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This in vitro study evaluated 104 molar and premolar teeth. The teeth were mounted in dry skulls and underwent CBCT with 4 protocols of high-resolution (HR), normal (NORM), ULD-HR, and ULD-NORM; 78 CBCT images were scored by 3 observers for the presence and penetration depth of caries twice with a 2-week interval using a 5-point Likert scale. The teeth were then sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope (gold standard). The 4 protocols were compared with each other and with the gold standard. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and compared by the Chi-square test (alpha = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interobserver agreement ranged from 0.5233 to 0.6034 for ULD-NORM, 0.5380 to 0.6279 for NORM, 0.5856 to 0.6300 for ULD-HR, and 0.6614 to 0.7707 for HR images. The intra-observer agreement ranged from 0.6027 to 0.8812 for ULD-HR, 0.7083 to 0.7556 for HR, 0.6076 to 0.9452 for ULD-NORM, and 0.7012 to 0.9221 for NORM images. Comparison of AUC revealed no significant difference between NORM and ULD-NORM (P > .05), or HR and ULD-HR (P > .05). The highest AUC belonged to HR (0.8529) and the lowest to NORM (0.7774).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the significant reduction in radiation dose in ULD CBCT and its acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of proximal caries, this protocol may be used for detection of proximal carious lesions and assessment of their depth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"459-467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估超低剂量(ULD)锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检测近端龋的准确性:这项体外研究评估了 104 颗臼齿和前臼齿。这些牙齿被安装在干燥的头骨中,并接受了高分辨率 (HR)、正常 (NORM)、ULD-HR 和 ULD-NORM 四种方案的 CBCT 扫描;78 张 CBCT 图像由三名观察者使用 5 点李克特量表对龋齿的存在和穿透深度进行两次评分,每次间隔 2 周。然后在体视显微镜(金标准)下对牙齿进行切片和观察。将四种方案相互比较,并与金标准进行比较。绘制接收器操作特征曲线(ROC),计算曲线下面积(AUC),并通过卡方检验(α=0.05)进行比较:ULD-NORM的观察者间一致性为0.5233至0.6034,NORM为0.5380至0.6279,ULD-HR为0.5856至0.6300,HR图像为0.6614至0.7707。ULD-HR 的观察者内部一致性为 0.6027 至 0.8812,HR 为 0.7083 至 0.7556,ULD-NORM 为 0.6076 至 0.9452,NORM 为 0.7012 至 0.9221。比较 AUC 发现,NORM 与 ULD-NORM 之间(P > 0.05)或 HR 与 ULD-HR 之间(P > 0.05)无显著差异。AUC最高的是HR(0.8529),最低的是NORM(0.7774):考虑到 ULD CBCT 的辐射剂量明显降低,且其对近端龋病检测的诊断准确性可以接受,该方案可用于近端龋病病变的检测及其深度评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vitro accuracy of ultra-low dose cone-beam CT for detection of proximal caries.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultra-low dose (ULD) cone-beam CT (CBCT) for detection of proximal caries.

Methods: This in vitro study evaluated 104 molar and premolar teeth. The teeth were mounted in dry skulls and underwent CBCT with 4 protocols of high-resolution (HR), normal (NORM), ULD-HR, and ULD-NORM; 78 CBCT images were scored by 3 observers for the presence and penetration depth of caries twice with a 2-week interval using a 5-point Likert scale. The teeth were then sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope (gold standard). The 4 protocols were compared with each other and with the gold standard. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and compared by the Chi-square test (alpha = .05).

Results: The interobserver agreement ranged from 0.5233 to 0.6034 for ULD-NORM, 0.5380 to 0.6279 for NORM, 0.5856 to 0.6300 for ULD-HR, and 0.6614 to 0.7707 for HR images. The intra-observer agreement ranged from 0.6027 to 0.8812 for ULD-HR, 0.7083 to 0.7556 for HR, 0.6076 to 0.9452 for ULD-NORM, and 0.7012 to 0.9221 for NORM images. Comparison of AUC revealed no significant difference between NORM and ULD-NORM (P > .05), or HR and ULD-HR (P > .05). The highest AUC belonged to HR (0.8529) and the lowest to NORM (0.7774).

Conclusions: Considering the significant reduction in radiation dose in ULD CBCT and its acceptable diagnostic accuracy for detection of proximal caries, this protocol may be used for detection of proximal carious lesions and assessment of their depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
期刊最新文献
Carotid calcifications in panoramic radiographs can predict vascular risk. Preparing for downstream tasks in AI for dental radiology: a baseline performance comparison of deep learning models. Temporomandibular joint assessment in MRI images using artificial intelligence tools: Where are we now? A systematic review. Gray values and noise behavior of cone-beam computed tomography machines-an in vitro study. A novel method for measuring the direction and angle of Central ray and predicting rotation center via panorama phantom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1