腰背痛的分类及其与残疾、生活质量和社会人口因素的关系:使用 PainDETECT 问卷进行的全面检查。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2024.2378177
Zachary Gan, Stone Sima, Samuel Lapkin, Ashish D Diwan
{"title":"腰背痛的分类及其与残疾、生活质量和社会人口因素的关系:使用 PainDETECT 问卷进行的全面检查。","authors":"Zachary Gan, Stone Sima, Samuel Lapkin, Ashish D Diwan","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2378177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a debilitating phenomenon that significantly impacts quality-of-life (QoL). The PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) is a screening tool aimed at distinguishing nociceptive pain (NoP) and neuropathic pain (NeP) classifications. Associations between these classifications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and sociodemographic parameters are yet to be established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to determine the relationship between NeP as assessed by the PD-Q and pain, disability, QoL, and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of an ongoing prospectively collected database was conducted involving 512 patients aged >18 years who presented to a tertiary spine clinic for LBP having completed the PainDETECT questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol Five-Dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire, or answered questions regarding sociodemographic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NeP group had a higher mean numerical rating scale (NRS) score (7.96<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>1.54 vs. 5.76<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>2.27, <i>p</i> <.001) and lower age (55<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>15.6 vs. 59<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>17.8, <i>p</i> <.05) compared to the NoP group. When confounded for NRS, analysis of covariance demonstrated an 89.5% higher total ODI score (<i>p</i> <.001) and 50.5% lower EQ-5D utility score (<i>p</i> <.001) in the NeP compared to NoP group. Smokers and individuals with a no partner marital status were 2.373 (OR = 2.373, 95% CI = 1.319-4.266, <i>p</i> <.01) and 2.384 times (OR = 2.384, 95% CI = 1.390-4.092, <i>p</i> <.01) more likely to have NeP compared to NoP, respectively. Patients with NeP were also of lower income class compared to patients with NoP (Z = -2.45, <i>p</i> <.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NeP was associated with higher levels of disability and lower QoL. Smokers, individuals with a no partner marital status, and individuals with a lower income class were more likely to suffer NeP rather than NoP. These findings have illuminated a crucial notion: in patients with elevated NRS, the detrimental impact of NeP on patient wellbeing underscores the fundamental need to represent pain on a nociceptive-neuropathic continuum, permitting more accurate differentiation of pain components.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low back pain classifications and their associations with disability, quality-of-life, and sociodemographic factors: a comprehensive examination using the PainDETECT questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Gan, Stone Sima, Samuel Lapkin, Ashish D Diwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2024.2378177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a debilitating phenomenon that significantly impacts quality-of-life (QoL). The PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) is a screening tool aimed at distinguishing nociceptive pain (NoP) and neuropathic pain (NeP) classifications. Associations between these classifications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and sociodemographic parameters are yet to be established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to determine the relationship between NeP as assessed by the PD-Q and pain, disability, QoL, and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of an ongoing prospectively collected database was conducted involving 512 patients aged >18 years who presented to a tertiary spine clinic for LBP having completed the PainDETECT questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol Five-Dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire, or answered questions regarding sociodemographic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NeP group had a higher mean numerical rating scale (NRS) score (7.96<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>1.54 vs. 5.76<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>2.27, <i>p</i> <.001) and lower age (55<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>15.6 vs. 59<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math>17.8, <i>p</i> <.05) compared to the NoP group. When confounded for NRS, analysis of covariance demonstrated an 89.5% higher total ODI score (<i>p</i> <.001) and 50.5% lower EQ-5D utility score (<i>p</i> <.001) in the NeP compared to NoP group. Smokers and individuals with a no partner marital status were 2.373 (OR = 2.373, 95% CI = 1.319-4.266, <i>p</i> <.01) and 2.384 times (OR = 2.384, 95% CI = 1.390-4.092, <i>p</i> <.01) more likely to have NeP compared to NoP, respectively. Patients with NeP were also of lower income class compared to patients with NoP (Z = -2.45, <i>p</i> <.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NeP was associated with higher levels of disability and lower QoL. Smokers, individuals with a no partner marital status, and individuals with a lower income class were more likely to suffer NeP rather than NoP. These findings have illuminated a crucial notion: in patients with elevated NRS, the detrimental impact of NeP on patient wellbeing underscores the fundamental need to represent pain on a nociceptive-neuropathic continuum, permitting more accurate differentiation of pain components.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1379-1387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2378177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2378177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰背痛(LBP)是一种严重影响生活质量(QOL)的衰弱现象。疼痛检测问卷(PD-Q)是一种筛查工具,旨在区分痛觉性疼痛(NoP)和神经性疼痛(NeP)的分类。这些分类与患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和社会人口学参数之间的关系尚未确定:本研究旨在确定由 PD-Q 评估的 NeP 与疼痛、残疾、QOL 和社会人口学因素之间的关系:该研究对正在进行的前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性分析,涉及 512 名年龄大于 18 岁、因腰痛到一家三级脊柱诊所就诊的患者,这些患者填写了疼痛检测问卷、Oswestry 残疾指数 (ODI)、EuroQol 五维 (EQ-5D) 问卷或回答了有关社会人口学状况的问题:NeP组的数字评分量表(NRS)平均得分更高(7.96±1.54 vs. 5.76±2.27,p ±15.6 vs. 59±17.8,p 结论:NeP与更高的疼痛水平相关:NeP 与较高的残疾程度和较低的 QOL 有关。吸烟者、无伴侣婚姻状况者和低收入阶层的人更有可能患 NeP,而不是 NoP。这些发现揭示了一个重要的概念:在 NRS 升高的患者中,NeP 对患者健康的不利影响凸显了在痛觉-神经病理连续体上表示疼痛的基本需要,从而可以更准确地区分疼痛的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low back pain classifications and their associations with disability, quality-of-life, and sociodemographic factors: a comprehensive examination using the PainDETECT questionnaire.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a debilitating phenomenon that significantly impacts quality-of-life (QoL). The PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) is a screening tool aimed at distinguishing nociceptive pain (NoP) and neuropathic pain (NeP) classifications. Associations between these classifications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and sociodemographic parameters are yet to be established.

Objective: The study aimed to determine the relationship between NeP as assessed by the PD-Q and pain, disability, QoL, and sociodemographic factors.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of an ongoing prospectively collected database was conducted involving 512 patients aged >18 years who presented to a tertiary spine clinic for LBP having completed the PainDETECT questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol Five-Dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire, or answered questions regarding sociodemographic status.

Results: The NeP group had a higher mean numerical rating scale (NRS) score (7.96±1.54 vs. 5.76±2.27, p <.001) and lower age (55±15.6 vs. 59±17.8, p <.05) compared to the NoP group. When confounded for NRS, analysis of covariance demonstrated an 89.5% higher total ODI score (p <.001) and 50.5% lower EQ-5D utility score (p <.001) in the NeP compared to NoP group. Smokers and individuals with a no partner marital status were 2.373 (OR = 2.373, 95% CI = 1.319-4.266, p <.01) and 2.384 times (OR = 2.384, 95% CI = 1.390-4.092, p <.01) more likely to have NeP compared to NoP, respectively. Patients with NeP were also of lower income class compared to patients with NoP (Z = -2.45, p <.05).

Conclusion: NeP was associated with higher levels of disability and lower QoL. Smokers, individuals with a no partner marital status, and individuals with a lower income class were more likely to suffer NeP rather than NoP. These findings have illuminated a crucial notion: in patients with elevated NRS, the detrimental impact of NeP on patient wellbeing underscores the fundamental need to represent pain on a nociceptive-neuropathic continuum, permitting more accurate differentiation of pain components.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
期刊最新文献
Serum calcium and liver injury in people living with HIV: a longitudinal cohort study in Southeast China. Cardio-oncology disparities in breast cancer: mapping the social gradient of dual disease burden. Comparative economic analysis of B-cell maturation antigen-targeted bispecific antibodies in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: linvoseltamab versus teclistamab and elranatamab. Nitrous oxide abuse prevalence, mechanisms, treatments and prevention. Real-world durability challenges with nAMD treatments and the potential promise of gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1