通过常规产前 75g 葡萄糖耐量测试诊断妊娠糖尿病的分类框架。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1080/14767058.2024.2373393
James Bernasko
{"title":"通过常规产前 75g 葡萄糖耐量测试诊断妊娠糖尿病的分类框架。","authors":"James Bernasko","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2373393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create an objective framework to classify gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by routine antenatal 75 g diabetes testing results to provide an alternative to current treatment-based classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A framework was created to classify gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (classes 1 through 4, determined by fasting and post-test glycemic abnormalities). A retrospective cohort chart review was used to correlate clinically how often diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy in each class. Chi-square analysis was used to assess inter-class differences in the success of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four of 228 (33%), 35/228 (15%), 76/228 (33%), and 43/228 (19%) of the study population were classified as Class 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. Of eighty-nine patients who maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy with diet alone 51/89 (57%) were Class 1, 20/89 (22.5%) were Class 2, 11/89 (12.5%) were Class 3, and 7/89 (8%) were Class 4. Chi-square analysis showed statistically significant inter-class differences in the likelihood of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this framework classifying gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (an objective proxy for disease severity), the higher the assigned class, the less likely that diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy (a clinical proxy for disease severity).</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework to classify gestational diabetes diagnosed by routine antenatal 75g glucose tolerance testing.\",\"authors\":\"James Bernasko\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2024.2373393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create an objective framework to classify gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by routine antenatal 75 g diabetes testing results to provide an alternative to current treatment-based classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A framework was created to classify gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (classes 1 through 4, determined by fasting and post-test glycemic abnormalities). A retrospective cohort chart review was used to correlate clinically how often diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy in each class. Chi-square analysis was used to assess inter-class differences in the success of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four of 228 (33%), 35/228 (15%), 76/228 (33%), and 43/228 (19%) of the study population were classified as Class 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. Of eighty-nine patients who maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy with diet alone 51/89 (57%) were Class 1, 20/89 (22.5%) were Class 2, 11/89 (12.5%) were Class 3, and 7/89 (8%) were Class 4. Chi-square analysis showed statistically significant inter-class differences in the likelihood of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this framework classifying gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (an objective proxy for disease severity), the higher the assigned class, the less likely that diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy (a clinical proxy for disease severity).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2373393\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2373393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的建立一个客观的框架,对通过常规产前 75 克糖尿病检测结果诊断出的妊娠糖尿病进行分类,为目前基于治疗的分类提供一个替代方案:根据常规产前 75 g GTT 检测后血糖异常的严重程度对妊娠糖尿病进行分类(1 至 4 级,由空腹和检测后血糖异常决定)。采用回顾性队列病历审查的方法,从临床角度分析了每个等级的孕妇在整个孕期仅靠饮食疗法维持血糖目标的频率。采用卡方分析法评估在整个妊娠期间单纯饮食疗法能否成功维持血糖目标的班级间差异:在 228 名研究对象中,分别有 74 人(33%)、35/228 人(15%)、76/228 人(33%)和 43/228 人(19%)被划分为 1、2、3 或 4 级。在整个孕期仅靠饮食维持血糖目标的 89 名患者中,51/89(57%)属于 1 级,20/89(22.5%)属于 2 级,11/89(12.5%)属于 3 级,7/89(8%)属于 4 级。卡方分析表明,在整个妊娠期间,仅靠饮食疗法维持血糖目标的可能性在等级间存在显著的统计学差异:结论:根据产前常规 75g GTT(疾病严重程度的客观代表)后血糖异常的严重程度对妊娠期糖尿病进行分类的这一框架中,所划分的等级越高,在整个孕期仅靠饮食疗法维持血糖目标(疾病严重程度的临床代表)的可能性越小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A framework to classify gestational diabetes diagnosed by routine antenatal 75g glucose tolerance testing.

Objective: To create an objective framework to classify gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by routine antenatal 75 g diabetes testing results to provide an alternative to current treatment-based classification.

Methods: A framework was created to classify gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (classes 1 through 4, determined by fasting and post-test glycemic abnormalities). A retrospective cohort chart review was used to correlate clinically how often diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy in each class. Chi-square analysis was used to assess inter-class differences in the success of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.

Results: Seventy-four of 228 (33%), 35/228 (15%), 76/228 (33%), and 43/228 (19%) of the study population were classified as Class 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. Of eighty-nine patients who maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy with diet alone 51/89 (57%) were Class 1, 20/89 (22.5%) were Class 2, 11/89 (12.5%) were Class 3, and 7/89 (8%) were Class 4. Chi-square analysis showed statistically significant inter-class differences in the likelihood of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.

Conclusion: In this framework classifying gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (an objective proxy for disease severity), the higher the assigned class, the less likely that diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy (a clinical proxy for disease severity).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
期刊最新文献
A meta-analysis of metformin and insulin on maternal outcome and neonatal outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor. Serotype distribution, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of group B Streptococcus isolates from Chinese pregnant woman. Accuracy of transcutaneous bilirubinometry in term infants after phototherapy: a prospective observational study. Association between circulating unsaturated fatty acid and preeclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1