新领域:利用 ChatGPT 扩展颅面研究。

Q2 Medicine Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.7181/acfs.2024.00115
Andi Zhang, Ethan Dimock, Rohun Gupta, Kevin Chen
{"title":"新领域:利用 ChatGPT 扩展颅面研究。","authors":"Andi Zhang, Ethan Dimock, Rohun Gupta, Kevin Chen","doi":"10.7181/acfs.2024.00115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the importance of evidence-based research in plastic surgery, the authors of this study aimed to assess the accuracy of ChatGPT in generating novel systematic review ideas within the field of craniofacial surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT was prompted to generate 20 novel systematic review ideas for 10 different subcategories within the field of craniofacial surgery. For each topic, the chatbot was told to give 10 \"general\" and 10 \"specific\" ideas that were related to the concept. In order to determine the accuracy of ChatGPT, a literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 200 total systematic review research ideas were generated by ChatGPT. We found that the algorithm had an overall 57.5% accuracy at identifying novel systematic review ideas. ChatGPT was found to be 39% accurate for general topics and 76% accurate for specific topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Craniofacial surgeons should use ChatGPT as a tool. We found that ChatGPT provided more precise answers with specific research questions than with general questions and helped narrow down the search scope, leading to a more relevant and accurate response. Beyond research purposes, ChatGPT can augment patient consultations, improve healthcare equity, and assist in clinical decisionmaking. With rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), it is important for plastic surgeons to consider using AI in their clinical practice to improve patient-centered outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52238,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"25 3","pages":"116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The new frontier: utilizing ChatGPT to expand craniofacial research.\",\"authors\":\"Andi Zhang, Ethan Dimock, Rohun Gupta, Kevin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.7181/acfs.2024.00115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the importance of evidence-based research in plastic surgery, the authors of this study aimed to assess the accuracy of ChatGPT in generating novel systematic review ideas within the field of craniofacial surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT was prompted to generate 20 novel systematic review ideas for 10 different subcategories within the field of craniofacial surgery. For each topic, the chatbot was told to give 10 \\\"general\\\" and 10 \\\"specific\\\" ideas that were related to the concept. In order to determine the accuracy of ChatGPT, a literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 200 total systematic review research ideas were generated by ChatGPT. We found that the algorithm had an overall 57.5% accuracy at identifying novel systematic review ideas. ChatGPT was found to be 39% accurate for general topics and 76% accurate for specific topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Craniofacial surgeons should use ChatGPT as a tool. We found that ChatGPT provided more precise answers with specific research questions than with general questions and helped narrow down the search scope, leading to a more relevant and accurate response. Beyond research purposes, ChatGPT can augment patient consultations, improve healthcare equity, and assist in clinical decisionmaking. With rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), it is important for plastic surgeons to consider using AI in their clinical practice to improve patient-centered outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"116-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2024.00115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2024.00115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于循证研究在整形外科中的重要性,本研究的作者旨在评估 ChatGPT 在颅面外科领域中生成新的系统综述观点的准确性:方法:在颅面外科领域内的 10 个不同子类别中,提示 ChatGPT 生成 20 个新颖的系统综述观点。对于每个主题,聊天机器人被要求给出与概念相关的 10 个 "一般 "和 10 个 "具体 "想法。为了确定 ChatGPT 的准确性,我们使用 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase 和 Cochrane 进行了文献综述:结果:ChatGPT 总共生成了 200 个系统综述研究观点。我们发现,该算法在识别新颖的系统综述观点方面总体准确率为 57.5%。ChatGPT 对一般主题的准确率为 39%,对特定主题的准确率为 76%:结论:颅颌面外科医生应将 ChatGPT 作为一种工具。我们发现,ChatGPT 对具体研究问题的回答比对一般问题的回答更准确,并有助于缩小搜索范围,从而获得更相关、更准确的回答。除研究目的外,ChatGPT 还能增强患者咨询、提高医疗公平性并协助临床决策。随着人工智能(AI)的快速发展,整形外科医生必须考虑在临床实践中使用人工智能,以改善以患者为中心的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The new frontier: utilizing ChatGPT to expand craniofacial research.

Background: Due to the importance of evidence-based research in plastic surgery, the authors of this study aimed to assess the accuracy of ChatGPT in generating novel systematic review ideas within the field of craniofacial surgery.

Methods: ChatGPT was prompted to generate 20 novel systematic review ideas for 10 different subcategories within the field of craniofacial surgery. For each topic, the chatbot was told to give 10 "general" and 10 "specific" ideas that were related to the concept. In order to determine the accuracy of ChatGPT, a literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane.

Results: In total, 200 total systematic review research ideas were generated by ChatGPT. We found that the algorithm had an overall 57.5% accuracy at identifying novel systematic review ideas. ChatGPT was found to be 39% accurate for general topics and 76% accurate for specific topics.

Conclusion: Craniofacial surgeons should use ChatGPT as a tool. We found that ChatGPT provided more precise answers with specific research questions than with general questions and helped narrow down the search scope, leading to a more relevant and accurate response. Beyond research purposes, ChatGPT can augment patient consultations, improve healthcare equity, and assist in clinical decisionmaking. With rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), it is important for plastic surgeons to consider using AI in their clinical practice to improve patient-centered outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Sublingual hematoma as a complication of mandibular midline osteotomy: a case report and literature review. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative primary systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma mimicking a ruptured epidermal cyst of the scalp: a case report and literature review. The agreement of panoramic radiography with cone-beam computed tomography in classifying impacted lower third molars: a systematic review. Is telepractice effective in speech therapy for children with cleft lip and palate during the COVID-19 pandemic? Primary mucinous carcinoma of the lower eyelid treated with wide excision and postoperative radiotherapy: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1