国际女子橄榄球联盟运动员在大型国际比赛中的能量消耗:双标记水研究。

Lara Wilson, Ben Jones, Susan H Backhouse, Andy Boyd, Catherine Hamby, Fraser Menzies, Cameron Owen, Carlos Ramirez-Lopez, Stephanie Roe, Ben Samuels, John R Speakman, Nessan Costello
{"title":"国际女子橄榄球联盟运动员在大型国际比赛中的能量消耗:双标记水研究。","authors":"Lara Wilson, Ben Jones, Susan H Backhouse, Andy Boyd, Catherine Hamby, Fraser Menzies, Cameron Owen, Carlos Ramirez-Lopez, Stephanie Roe, Ben Samuels, John R Speakman, Nessan Costello","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2023-0596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to quantify the total energy expenditure (TEE) of international female rugby union players. Fifteen players were assessed over 14 days throughout an international multi-game tournament, which represented two consecutive one-match microcycles. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and TEE were assessed by indirect calorimetry and doubly labelled water, respectively. Physical activity level (PAL) was estimated (TEE:RMR). Mean RMR, TEE, and PAL were 6.60 ± 0.93 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (1578 ± 223 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>), 13.51 ± 2.28 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (3229 ± 545 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>), and 2.0 ± 0.3 AU, respectively. There was no difference in TEE (13.74 ± 2.31 (3284 ± 554 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) vs. 13.92 ± 2.10 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (3327 ± 502 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>); <i>p</i> = 0.754), or PAL (2.06 ± 0.26 AU vs. 2.09 ± 0.23 AU; <i>p</i> = 0.735) across microcycles, despite substantial decreases in training load (total distance: -8088 m, collisions: -20 n, training duration: -252 min). After correcting for body composition, there was no difference in TEE (13.80 ± 1.74 (3298 ± 416 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1)</sup> vs. 13.16 ± 1.97 (3145 ± 471 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) adj. MJ·day<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.190), RMR (6.49 ± 0.81 (1551 ± 194 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) vs. 6.73 ± 0.83 (1609 ± 198 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) adj. MJ·day<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.633) or PAL (2.15 ± 0.14 vs. 1.87 ± 0.26 AU, <i>p</i> = 0.090) between forwards and backs. For an injured participant (<i>n</i> = 1), TEE reduced by 1.7 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (-401 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) from pre-injury. For participants with illness (<i>n</i> = 3), TEE was similar to pre-illness (+0.49 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (+117 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>)). The energy requirements of international female rugby players were consistent across one-match microcycles. Forwards and backs had similar adjusted energy requirements. These findings are critical to inform the dietary guidance provided to female rugby players.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy expenditure of international female rugby union players during a major international tournament: a doubly labelled water study.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Wilson, Ben Jones, Susan H Backhouse, Andy Boyd, Catherine Hamby, Fraser Menzies, Cameron Owen, Carlos Ramirez-Lopez, Stephanie Roe, Ben Samuels, John R Speakman, Nessan Costello\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/apnm-2023-0596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to quantify the total energy expenditure (TEE) of international female rugby union players. Fifteen players were assessed over 14 days throughout an international multi-game tournament, which represented two consecutive one-match microcycles. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and TEE were assessed by indirect calorimetry and doubly labelled water, respectively. Physical activity level (PAL) was estimated (TEE:RMR). Mean RMR, TEE, and PAL were 6.60 ± 0.93 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (1578 ± 223 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>), 13.51 ± 2.28 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (3229 ± 545 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>), and 2.0 ± 0.3 AU, respectively. There was no difference in TEE (13.74 ± 2.31 (3284 ± 554 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) vs. 13.92 ± 2.10 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (3327 ± 502 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>); <i>p</i> = 0.754), or PAL (2.06 ± 0.26 AU vs. 2.09 ± 0.23 AU; <i>p</i> = 0.735) across microcycles, despite substantial decreases in training load (total distance: -8088 m, collisions: -20 n, training duration: -252 min). After correcting for body composition, there was no difference in TEE (13.80 ± 1.74 (3298 ± 416 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1)</sup> vs. 13.16 ± 1.97 (3145 ± 471 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) adj. MJ·day<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.190), RMR (6.49 ± 0.81 (1551 ± 194 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) vs. 6.73 ± 0.83 (1609 ± 198 adj. kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) adj. MJ·day<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.633) or PAL (2.15 ± 0.14 vs. 1.87 ± 0.26 AU, <i>p</i> = 0.090) between forwards and backs. For an injured participant (<i>n</i> = 1), TEE reduced by 1.7 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (-401 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>) from pre-injury. For participants with illness (<i>n</i> = 3), TEE was similar to pre-illness (+0.49 MJ·day<sup>-1</sup> (+117 kcal·day<sup>-1</sup>)). The energy requirements of international female rugby players were consistent across one-match microcycles. Forwards and backs had similar adjusted energy requirements. These findings are critical to inform the dietary guidance provided to female rugby players.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2023-0596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2023-0596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在量化国际女子橄榄球联盟球员的总能量消耗(TEE)。在为期 14 天的国际多场比赛中,对 15 名球员进行了评估,这代表了两个连续的单场比赛微循环。静息代谢率(RMR)和 TEE 分别通过间接热量计和双标记水进行评估。对体力活动水平(PAL)进行了估算(TEE:RMR)。平均 RMR、TEE 和 PAL 分别为 6.60 ± 0.93 MJ.天-1、13.51 ± 2.28 MJ.day-1 和 2.0 ± 0.3 AU。尽管训练负荷大幅减少(总距离:-8088 米,碰撞次数:-20 次,训练时间:-252 分钟),但各微循环中的 TEE(13.74 ± 2.31 对 13.92 ± 2.10 MJ.日-1;p = 0.754)和 PAL(2.06 ± 0.26 AU 对 2.09 ± 0.23 AU;p = 0.735)没有差异。在对身体成分进行校正后,前锋和后卫之间的 TEE(13.80 ± 1.74 vs. 13.16 ± 1.97 adj. MJ.day-1,p = 0.190)、RMR(6.49 ± 0.81 vs. 6.73 ± 0.83 adj. MJ.day-1,p = 0.633)或 PAL(2.15 ± 0.14 vs. 1.87 ± 0.26 AU,p = 0.090)均无差异。对于一名受伤的参赛者(n = 1),TEE 比受伤前减少了 1.7 MJ.day-1。对于生病的参赛者(n = 3),TEE 与生病前相似(+0.49 兆焦耳/天-1)。国际女子橄榄球运动员在一场比赛的微循环中对能量的需求是一致的。前锋和后卫的调整后能量需求相似。这些发现对于为女子橄榄球运动员提供饮食指导至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energy expenditure of international female rugby union players during a major international tournament: a doubly labelled water study.

The purpose of this study was to quantify the total energy expenditure (TEE) of international female rugby union players. Fifteen players were assessed over 14 days throughout an international multi-game tournament, which represented two consecutive one-match microcycles. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and TEE were assessed by indirect calorimetry and doubly labelled water, respectively. Physical activity level (PAL) was estimated (TEE:RMR). Mean RMR, TEE, and PAL were 6.60 ± 0.93 MJ·day-1 (1578 ± 223 kcal·day-1), 13.51 ± 2.28 MJ·day-1 (3229 ± 545 kcal·day-1), and 2.0 ± 0.3 AU, respectively. There was no difference in TEE (13.74 ± 2.31 (3284 ± 554 kcal·day-1) vs. 13.92 ± 2.10 MJ·day-1 (3327 ± 502 kcal·day-1); p = 0.754), or PAL (2.06 ± 0.26 AU vs. 2.09 ± 0.23 AU; p = 0.735) across microcycles, despite substantial decreases in training load (total distance: -8088 m, collisions: -20 n, training duration: -252 min). After correcting for body composition, there was no difference in TEE (13.80 ± 1.74 (3298 ± 416 adj. kcal·day-1) vs. 13.16 ± 1.97 (3145 ± 471 adj. kcal·day-1) adj. MJ·day-1, p = 0.190), RMR (6.49 ± 0.81 (1551 ± 194 adj. kcal·day-1) vs. 6.73 ± 0.83 (1609 ± 198 adj. kcal·day-1) adj. MJ·day-1, p = 0.633) or PAL (2.15 ± 0.14 vs. 1.87 ± 0.26 AU, p = 0.090) between forwards and backs. For an injured participant (n = 1), TEE reduced by 1.7 MJ·day-1 (-401 kcal·day-1) from pre-injury. For participants with illness (n = 3), TEE was similar to pre-illness (+0.49 MJ·day-1 (+117 kcal·day-1)). The energy requirements of international female rugby players were consistent across one-match microcycles. Forwards and backs had similar adjusted energy requirements. These findings are critical to inform the dietary guidance provided to female rugby players.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eating Traditional Foods Enhances Diet Quality Among First Nations in Canada: An Analysis Using the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 (HEFI-2019) and the Canadian Healthy Eating Index 2007 (C-HEI 2007). Retinol-binding protein 4 is a potential biomarker of changes in lean mass in postmenopausal women. A narrative review of velocity-based training best practice: The importance of contraction intent vs. movement speed. A reduced carbohydrate diet improves glycemic regulation in hyperglycemic older people in a retirement home: The SAGE study. Feet-heating and Calf-heating have Opposing Effects on Glucose Tolerance and Heart Rate Variability: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1