分析两种治疗痔疮切除术后疼痛的方法

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247
Sergio Susmallian, Iris Aviv, Irena Babis, Eran Segal
{"title":"分析两种治疗痔疮切除术后疼痛的方法","authors":"Sergio Susmallian, Iris Aviv, Irena Babis, Eran Segal","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of two pharmacological treatments, \"around-the-clock\" analgesic treatment (ACAT) and \"on-demand\" analgesic treatment (ODAT), for managing postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy. Material and <b>Methods:</b> The study, conducted from July 2016 to December 2020, included 5335 hemorrhoidectomy patients. Participants were divided into ACAT (3767) and ODAT (1568) groups. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182). <b>Results:</b> Patients had a mean age of 47.47 years, with 59.98% males. Postoperatively, 14.13% reported severe pain, 36.49% moderate, 34.28% mild, and 15.09% no pain. ACAT group's maximum pain was 3.04 (VAS), ODAT 4.95 (p; average pain was 0.79 (ACAT) and 1.45 (ODAT). Discharge pain was 0.42 (ACAT) and 0.63 (ODAT) VAS. The ACAT group consistently reported lower levels of pain across all measured instances. Higher BMI and younger age were pain risk factors (p=.049, p .001 respectively). ACAT administration resulted in reduced opioid usage, with meperidine showing a 68.38% decrease, morphine 43.57% less, tramadol 46.82% less, oxycodone reduced by 38.74%, and codeine by 53.40%. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics was notably lower in the ACAT group, ranging from 16% to 59% less compared to the ODAT group. Conclusion: Hemorrhoidectomy induces moderate postoperative pain, with only 14% experiencing severe pain. A fixed schedule multimodal pain regimen, regardless of procedure and anesthesia type, reduces pain from moderate to mild post-hemorrhoidectomy. This approach also decreases opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements. Higher BMI and younger age are identified as risk factors for elevated postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"247-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Two Treatment Modalities for Post-surgical Pain after Hemorrhoidectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Susmallian, Iris Aviv, Irena Babis, Eran Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of two pharmacological treatments, \\\"around-the-clock\\\" analgesic treatment (ACAT) and \\\"on-demand\\\" analgesic treatment (ODAT), for managing postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy. Material and <b>Methods:</b> The study, conducted from July 2016 to December 2020, included 5335 hemorrhoidectomy patients. Participants were divided into ACAT (3767) and ODAT (1568) groups. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182). <b>Results:</b> Patients had a mean age of 47.47 years, with 59.98% males. Postoperatively, 14.13% reported severe pain, 36.49% moderate, 34.28% mild, and 15.09% no pain. ACAT group's maximum pain was 3.04 (VAS), ODAT 4.95 (p; average pain was 0.79 (ACAT) and 1.45 (ODAT). Discharge pain was 0.42 (ACAT) and 0.63 (ODAT) VAS. The ACAT group consistently reported lower levels of pain across all measured instances. Higher BMI and younger age were pain risk factors (p=.049, p .001 respectively). ACAT administration resulted in reduced opioid usage, with meperidine showing a 68.38% decrease, morphine 43.57% less, tramadol 46.82% less, oxycodone reduced by 38.74%, and codeine by 53.40%. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics was notably lower in the ACAT group, ranging from 16% to 59% less compared to the ODAT group. Conclusion: Hemorrhoidectomy induces moderate postoperative pain, with only 14% experiencing severe pain. A fixed schedule multimodal pain regimen, regardless of procedure and anesthesia type, reduces pain from moderate to mild post-hemorrhoidectomy. This approach also decreases opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements. Higher BMI and younger age are identified as risk factors for elevated postoperative pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"119 3\",\"pages\":\"247-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景这项非随机研究旨在比较 "全天候 "镇痛治疗(ACAT)和 "按需 "镇痛治疗(ODAT)这两种药物治疗在控制痔切除术后疼痛方面的疗效。材料与方法:研究于 2016 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月进行,共纳入 5335 名痔切除术患者。参与者被分为 ACAT 组(3767 人)和 ODAT 组(1568 人)。该研究已在 clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182)上注册。研究结果患者平均年龄 47.47 岁,男性占 59.98%。术后,14.13%的患者报告有剧烈疼痛,36.49%为中度疼痛,34.28%为轻度疼痛,15.09%为无痛。ACAT 组的最大疼痛为 3.04(VAS),ODAT 组为 4.95(p;平均疼痛为 0.79(ACAT)和 1.45(ODAT)。出院时的 VAS 疼痛分别为 0.42(ACAT)和 0.63(ODAT)。在所有测量实例中,ACAT 组报告的疼痛程度始终较低。较高的体重指数和较年轻的年龄是疼痛的危险因素(分别为 p=.049 和 p .001)。使用 ACAT 可减少阿片类药物的使用,其中甲哌丁减少了 68.38%,吗啡减少了 43.57%,曲马多减少了 46.82%,羟考酮减少了 38.74%,可待因减少了 53.40%。此外,与 ODAT 组相比,ACAT 组非阿片类镇痛药的使用明显减少,减少幅度从 16% 到 59% 不等。结论痔疮切除术会引起中度术后疼痛,只有 14% 的患者会感到剧烈疼痛。无论手术过程和麻醉类型如何,固定时间表的多模式止痛方案都能将痔疮切除术后的疼痛从中度减轻到轻度。这种方法还能减少对阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药的需求。较高的体重指数和较年轻的年龄被认为是术后疼痛加剧的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Two Treatment Modalities for Post-surgical Pain after Hemorrhoidectomy.

Background: This non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of two pharmacological treatments, "around-the-clock" analgesic treatment (ACAT) and "on-demand" analgesic treatment (ODAT), for managing postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy. Material and Methods: The study, conducted from July 2016 to December 2020, included 5335 hemorrhoidectomy patients. Participants were divided into ACAT (3767) and ODAT (1568) groups. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182). Results: Patients had a mean age of 47.47 years, with 59.98% males. Postoperatively, 14.13% reported severe pain, 36.49% moderate, 34.28% mild, and 15.09% no pain. ACAT group's maximum pain was 3.04 (VAS), ODAT 4.95 (p; average pain was 0.79 (ACAT) and 1.45 (ODAT). Discharge pain was 0.42 (ACAT) and 0.63 (ODAT) VAS. The ACAT group consistently reported lower levels of pain across all measured instances. Higher BMI and younger age were pain risk factors (p=.049, p .001 respectively). ACAT administration resulted in reduced opioid usage, with meperidine showing a 68.38% decrease, morphine 43.57% less, tramadol 46.82% less, oxycodone reduced by 38.74%, and codeine by 53.40%. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics was notably lower in the ACAT group, ranging from 16% to 59% less compared to the ODAT group. Conclusion: Hemorrhoidectomy induces moderate postoperative pain, with only 14% experiencing severe pain. A fixed schedule multimodal pain regimen, regardless of procedure and anesthesia type, reduces pain from moderate to mild post-hemorrhoidectomy. This approach also decreases opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements. Higher BMI and younger age are identified as risk factors for elevated postoperative pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Lymphatic Drainage Through Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma Using a Radioactive Tracer - Technetium-99m (99mTc). Young RAES Minimally Invasive Surgery Training and Education Survey in Romania. Axillary Lymph Node Dissection versus Loco-regional Radiotherapy in Management of the Axilla in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Axillary Reverse Mapping Using Indocyanine Green and Concurrent Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients with or without Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment. Diagnosis and Management of Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer Surgery - A Five-Year Retrospective Study in a Single Surgical Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1