移植失败后再次进行 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术的临床效果。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Cornea Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003622
Achraf Laouani, Indrė Vasiliauskaitė, Vincent J A Bourgonje, Mohamed Ghaly, Charlotte Lanser, Isabel van Lieshout, Lamis Baydoun, Viridiana Kocaba, Gerrit R J Melles, Silke Oellerich
{"title":"移植失败后再次进行 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术的临床效果。","authors":"Achraf Laouani, Indrė Vasiliauskaitė, Vincent J A Bourgonje, Mohamed Ghaly, Charlotte Lanser, Isabel van Lieshout, Lamis Baydoun, Viridiana Kocaba, Gerrit R J Melles, Silke Oellerich","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcomes after repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for technical failure (TF) and secondary graft failure (SGF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 49 eyes that underwent repeat DMEK either for TF (ie, persistent graft detachment, n = 24) or for SGF (ie, late endothelial graft failure, n = 25). Surgery indications for primary DMEK were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD, 80%) and bullous keratopathy (BK, 20%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal backscattering, pachymetry, and graft survival. Outcomes were compared with an age-matched control group of 49 primary DMEK eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA improved from 0.92 ± 0.6 before to 0.20 ± 0.3 at 1 year after repeat DMEK with better outcomes for eyes with TF than those with SGF ( P = 0.046). Donor ECD decreased from 2618 ± 171 cells/mm 2 before to 1247 ± 422 cells/mm 2 at 1 year postoperatively, with no difference between technical TF and SGF eyes ( P > 0.05). One-year BCVA and ECD outcomes were better in the control group than in the repeat DMEK group ( P < 0.05). Five-year graft survival probability after repeat DMEK was better for TF than for SGF eyes (100% vs. 75%, P = 0.010) and better for eyes with FECD than BK as primary indication for surgery (92% vs. 65%, P = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeat DMEK gives acceptable clinical outcomes especially when performed for TF in the early period after primary DMEK. Long-term graft survival probability after repeat DMEK is comparable to primary DMEK for FECD eyes, whereas BK eyes may show an elevated risk to develop graft failure again.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":"455-462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Graft Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Achraf Laouani, Indrė Vasiliauskaitė, Vincent J A Bourgonje, Mohamed Ghaly, Charlotte Lanser, Isabel van Lieshout, Lamis Baydoun, Viridiana Kocaba, Gerrit R J Melles, Silke Oellerich\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcomes after repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for technical failure (TF) and secondary graft failure (SGF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 49 eyes that underwent repeat DMEK either for TF (ie, persistent graft detachment, n = 24) or for SGF (ie, late endothelial graft failure, n = 25). Surgery indications for primary DMEK were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD, 80%) and bullous keratopathy (BK, 20%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal backscattering, pachymetry, and graft survival. Outcomes were compared with an age-matched control group of 49 primary DMEK eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA improved from 0.92 ± 0.6 before to 0.20 ± 0.3 at 1 year after repeat DMEK with better outcomes for eyes with TF than those with SGF ( P = 0.046). Donor ECD decreased from 2618 ± 171 cells/mm 2 before to 1247 ± 422 cells/mm 2 at 1 year postoperatively, with no difference between technical TF and SGF eyes ( P > 0.05). One-year BCVA and ECD outcomes were better in the control group than in the repeat DMEK group ( P < 0.05). Five-year graft survival probability after repeat DMEK was better for TF than for SGF eyes (100% vs. 75%, P = 0.010) and better for eyes with FECD than BK as primary indication for surgery (92% vs. 65%, P = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeat DMEK gives acceptable clinical outcomes especially when performed for TF in the early period after primary DMEK. Long-term graft survival probability after repeat DMEK is comparable to primary DMEK for FECD eyes, whereas BK eyes may show an elevated risk to develop graft failure again.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"455-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003622\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估因技术失败(TF)和继发性移植物失败(SGF)而重复进行德斯梅特膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)后的临床效果:方法:对49只因TF(即移植物持续脱落,24只)或SGF(即晚期内皮移植物失败,25只)而接受重复DMEK手术的眼睛进行回顾性分析。原发性 DMEK 的手术适应症为富克斯内皮角膜营养不良症(Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy,FECD,80%)和牛皮状角膜病(bullous keratopathy,BK,20%)。主要结果指标包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、内皮细胞密度(ECD)、角膜反向散射、角膜厚度和移植物存活率。结果与年龄匹配的 49 只原发性 DMEK 眼睛对照组进行了比较:结果:BCVA最小分辨角的对数从重复DMEK前的0.92 ± 0.6提高到1年后的0.20 ± 0.3,TF眼的结果优于SGF眼(P = 0.046)。供体 ECD 从术前的 2618 ± 171 cells/mm2 下降到术后 1 年的 1247 ± 422 cells/mm2,技术 TF 眼和 SGF 眼之间没有差异(P > 0.05)。对照组的一年 BCVA 和 ECD 结果优于重复 DMEK 组(P < 0.05)。重复DMEK手术后,TF眼的五年移植物存活率高于SGF眼(100% vs. 75%,P = 0.010),以FECD为主要手术指征的眼的存活率高于以BK为主要手术指征的眼(92% vs. 65%,P = 0.042):结论:重复DMEK手术可获得可接受的临床结果,尤其是在初次DMEK手术后早期为TF进行的手术。对于FECD眼,重复DMEK手术后的长期移植物存活率与初次DMEK手术相当,而BK眼再次发生移植物失败的风险可能较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Outcomes of Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Graft Failure.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes after repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for technical failure (TF) and secondary graft failure (SGF).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 49 eyes that underwent repeat DMEK either for TF (ie, persistent graft detachment, n = 24) or for SGF (ie, late endothelial graft failure, n = 25). Surgery indications for primary DMEK were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD, 80%) and bullous keratopathy (BK, 20%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal backscattering, pachymetry, and graft survival. Outcomes were compared with an age-matched control group of 49 primary DMEK eyes.

Results: Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA improved from 0.92 ± 0.6 before to 0.20 ± 0.3 at 1 year after repeat DMEK with better outcomes for eyes with TF than those with SGF ( P = 0.046). Donor ECD decreased from 2618 ± 171 cells/mm 2 before to 1247 ± 422 cells/mm 2 at 1 year postoperatively, with no difference between technical TF and SGF eyes ( P > 0.05). One-year BCVA and ECD outcomes were better in the control group than in the repeat DMEK group ( P < 0.05). Five-year graft survival probability after repeat DMEK was better for TF than for SGF eyes (100% vs. 75%, P = 0.010) and better for eyes with FECD than BK as primary indication for surgery (92% vs. 65%, P = 0.042).

Conclusions: Repeat DMEK gives acceptable clinical outcomes especially when performed for TF in the early period after primary DMEK. Long-term graft survival probability after repeat DMEK is comparable to primary DMEK for FECD eyes, whereas BK eyes may show an elevated risk to develop graft failure again.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
期刊最新文献
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With and Without Graft Deswelling: A Prospective Clinical Study. Prophylactic Therapy for Long-Term Ocular Discomfort After Cataract Surgery. Corneal Backscatter, Pachymetric Indices, and Ectasia Indices for the Assessment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis. The Impact of Donor History of Sleep Apnea on Corneal Tissue Evaluation Parameters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1