根霉菌种分离物抗真菌药敏试验方法的比较评估。

Mohd Saqib Hasan, Prashant Gupta, Gopa Banerjee
{"title":"根霉菌种分离物抗真菌药敏试验方法的比较评估。","authors":"Mohd Saqib Hasan, Prashant Gupta, Gopa Banerjee","doi":"10.22034/cmm.2024.345165.1480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The mainstay of treatment for COVID-19-associated mucormycosis was liposomal Amphotericin B. Other antifungal agents, such as posaconazole and isavuconazole, were used as well. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommend broth microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. In this regard, the present study aimed to see what potency and zone diameters correlate with the gold standard broth microdilution method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All the isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight. In total, 127 isolates of 83 <i>Rhizopus oryzae</i> complex and 44 isolates of <i>Rhizopus microsporus</i> complex were selected. Anti-fungal susceptibility testing by disc diffusion and E-test was performed on Mueller Hinton Agar and compared with the CLSI broth microdilution method of Anti-fungal susceptibility testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percentage agreement was found to be more in the case of the E test than the disc diffusion method. In the case of <i>R. oryzae</i>, posaconazole had 98.79% agreement with broth microdilution followed by Isavuconazole (97.59%), Itraconazole (96.38%), and Amphotericin B (91.56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disc diffusion correlates well with broth microdilution, although its correlation is weaker when compared to the E test. Effective concentration of Amphotericin B discs for antifungal susceptibility testing depends on the specific <i>Rhizopus</i> species.</p>","PeriodicalId":10863,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Mycology","volume":"9 4","pages":"47-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of antifungal susceptibility testing methods for <i>Rhizopus</i> species isolates.\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Saqib Hasan, Prashant Gupta, Gopa Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.22034/cmm.2024.345165.1480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The mainstay of treatment for COVID-19-associated mucormycosis was liposomal Amphotericin B. Other antifungal agents, such as posaconazole and isavuconazole, were used as well. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommend broth microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. In this regard, the present study aimed to see what potency and zone diameters correlate with the gold standard broth microdilution method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All the isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight. In total, 127 isolates of 83 <i>Rhizopus oryzae</i> complex and 44 isolates of <i>Rhizopus microsporus</i> complex were selected. Anti-fungal susceptibility testing by disc diffusion and E-test was performed on Mueller Hinton Agar and compared with the CLSI broth microdilution method of Anti-fungal susceptibility testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percentage agreement was found to be more in the case of the E test than the disc diffusion method. In the case of <i>R. oryzae</i>, posaconazole had 98.79% agreement with broth microdilution followed by Isavuconazole (97.59%), Itraconazole (96.38%), and Amphotericin B (91.56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disc diffusion correlates well with broth microdilution, although its correlation is weaker when compared to the E test. Effective concentration of Amphotericin B discs for antifungal susceptibility testing depends on the specific <i>Rhizopus</i> species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Mycology\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"47-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Mycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22034/cmm.2024.345165.1480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22034/cmm.2024.345165.1480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:COVID-19相关粘孢子菌病的主要治疗方法是两性霉素B脂质体,同时也使用其他抗真菌药物,如泊沙康唑和异黄康唑。临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI)和欧洲抗菌药物药敏试验委员会建议采用肉汤微量稀释法进行抗真菌药敏试验。因此,本研究旨在了解药效和区域直径与金标准肉汤微稀释法的相关性:所有分离物均采用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间法进行鉴定。总共从 83 个根瘤菌复合体和 44 个微孢子根瘤菌复合体中筛选出 127 个分离物。在穆勒欣顿琼脂上通过圆盘扩散法和电子测试法进行抗真菌药敏试验,并与 CLSI 肉汤微量稀释法进行抗真菌药敏试验比较:结果:发现 E 试验的一致性百分比高于盘扩散法。就 R. oryzae 而言,泊沙康唑与肉汤微量稀释法的一致率为 98.79%,其次是伊沙康唑(97.59%)、伊曲康唑(96.38%)和两性霉素 B(91.56%):圆盘扩散法与肉汤微量稀释法有很好的相关性,但与 E 试验相比相关性较弱。抗真菌药敏试验中两性霉素 B 盘的有效浓度取决于具体的根瘤菌种类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative evaluation of antifungal susceptibility testing methods for Rhizopus species isolates.

Background and purpose: The mainstay of treatment for COVID-19-associated mucormycosis was liposomal Amphotericin B. Other antifungal agents, such as posaconazole and isavuconazole, were used as well. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommend broth microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. In this regard, the present study aimed to see what potency and zone diameters correlate with the gold standard broth microdilution method.

Materials and methods: All the isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight. In total, 127 isolates of 83 Rhizopus oryzae complex and 44 isolates of Rhizopus microsporus complex were selected. Anti-fungal susceptibility testing by disc diffusion and E-test was performed on Mueller Hinton Agar and compared with the CLSI broth microdilution method of Anti-fungal susceptibility testing.

Results: Percentage agreement was found to be more in the case of the E test than the disc diffusion method. In the case of R. oryzae, posaconazole had 98.79% agreement with broth microdilution followed by Isavuconazole (97.59%), Itraconazole (96.38%), and Amphotericin B (91.56%).

Conclusion: Disc diffusion correlates well with broth microdilution, although its correlation is weaker when compared to the E test. Effective concentration of Amphotericin B discs for antifungal susceptibility testing depends on the specific Rhizopus species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Mycology
Current Medical Mycology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of yeast probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii cell wall extract on Aspergillus fumigatus allergenicity in A549 cells. Enhanced in-vitro anti-Candida efficacy of Euphorbia milii Des Moul mediated copper nanoparticles against clinically isolated Candida albicans. Evaluation of exoenzyme profiles of Candida albicans species isolated from females with vaginal candidiasis. Candida auris in a tertiary healthcare setting in south India: A case series. In vitro antifungal activity of biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles using plant extracts and six comparators against clinical Fusarium strains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1