田纳西州初级保健医生和社区药剂师提供纳洛酮的理论解释。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.07.001
{"title":"田纳西州初级保健医生和社区药剂师提供纳洛酮的理论解释。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Increasing access to naloxone reduces opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Primary care and </span>community pharmacy settings are critical access points, yet limited theoretical research has examined naloxone prescribing and dispensing behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine if the theory of planned behavior (TPB) combined with theoretical constructs from communication science explains intentions to co-prescribe and discuss co-dispensing naloxone among primary care physicians and community pharmacists, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study surveyed cohorts of licensed primary care physicians and community pharmacists in Tennessee in 2017. Intentions were measured using profession-specific case vignettes, whereby they were asked given 10 similar patients, how many times (0–10) would they co-prescribe or discuss co-dispensing naloxone. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analytic sample included 295 physicians (response rate = 15.6 %) and 423 pharmacists (response rate = 19.4 %). Approximately 65 % of physicians reported never intending to co-prescribe naloxone (0 out of 10 patients), while 47 % of pharmacists reported never intending to discuss co-dispensing. All TPB constructs—attitudes (AOR = 1.32, CI = 1.16–1.50), subjective norms (AOR = 1.17, CI = 1.06–1.30), and perceived behavioral control (AOR 1.16, CI = 1.02–1.33)—were associated with an increased likelihood of pharmacists always (versus never) discussing co-dispensing. Similarly, two TPB constructs—attitudes (AOR = 1.41, CI = 1.19–1.68) and subjective norms (AOR = 1.22, CI = 1.08–1.39)—were associated with an increased likelihood of physicians always co-prescribing. Among physicians only, one communication construct—self-perceived communication competence (AOR = 1.19, CI = 1.01–1.41)—was associated with an increased likelihood of always co-prescribing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings support the value of theory, particularly TPB, in explaining primary care physician intentions to co-prescribe and community pharmacist intentions to discuss co-dispensing naloxone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A theoretical explanation of naloxone provision among primary care physicians and community pharmacists in Tennessee\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Increasing access to naloxone reduces opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Primary care and </span>community pharmacy settings are critical access points, yet limited theoretical research has examined naloxone prescribing and dispensing behaviors.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine if the theory of planned behavior (TPB) combined with theoretical constructs from communication science explains intentions to co-prescribe and discuss co-dispensing naloxone among primary care physicians and community pharmacists, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study surveyed cohorts of licensed primary care physicians and community pharmacists in Tennessee in 2017. Intentions were measured using profession-specific case vignettes, whereby they were asked given 10 similar patients, how many times (0–10) would they co-prescribe or discuss co-dispensing naloxone. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analytic sample included 295 physicians (response rate = 15.6 %) and 423 pharmacists (response rate = 19.4 %). Approximately 65 % of physicians reported never intending to co-prescribe naloxone (0 out of 10 patients), while 47 % of pharmacists reported never intending to discuss co-dispensing. All TPB constructs—attitudes (AOR = 1.32, CI = 1.16–1.50), subjective norms (AOR = 1.17, CI = 1.06–1.30), and perceived behavioral control (AOR 1.16, CI = 1.02–1.33)—were associated with an increased likelihood of pharmacists always (versus never) discussing co-dispensing. Similarly, two TPB constructs—attitudes (AOR = 1.41, CI = 1.19–1.68) and subjective norms (AOR = 1.22, CI = 1.08–1.39)—were associated with an increased likelihood of physicians always co-prescribing. Among physicians only, one communication construct—self-perceived communication competence (AOR = 1.19, CI = 1.01–1.41)—was associated with an increased likelihood of always co-prescribing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings support the value of theory, particularly TPB, in explaining primary care physician intentions to co-prescribe and community pharmacist intentions to discuss co-dispensing naloxone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124002043\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124002043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提高纳洛酮的可及性可降低阿片类药物相关的发病率和死亡率。初级保健和社区药房是关键的获取点,但对纳洛酮处方和配药行为的理论研究却很有限:目的:确定计划行为理论(TPB)与传播学的理论建构相结合,是否能解释初级保健医生和社区药剂师分别共同处方纳洛酮和讨论共同配药纳洛酮的意图:这项横断面研究调查了 2017 年田纳西州的执业全科医生和社区药剂师群体。使用特定职业的病例小故事来衡量他们的意向,即询问他们在有 10 名类似患者的情况下,会共同处方或讨论共同配药纳洛酮的次数(0-10)。采用了双变量和多变量分析:分析样本包括 295 名医生(回复率 = 15.6%)和 423 名药剂师(回复率 = 19.4%)。约 65% 的医生表示从未打算联合处方纳洛酮(10 名患者中 0 名),而 47% 的药剂师表示从未打算讨论联合配药。所有 TPB 构建--态度(AOR = 1.32,CI = 1.16-1.50)、主观规范(AOR = 1.17,CI = 1.06-1.30)和感知行为控制(AOR 1.16,CI = 1.02-1.33)--都与药剂师总是(与从不)讨论共同配药的可能性增加有关。同样,两个 TPB 构建--态度(AOR = 1.41,CI = 1.19-1.68)和主观规范(AOR = 1.22,CI = 1.08-1.39)--与医生总是共同处方的可能性增加有关。仅在医生中,一个沟通因素--自我感觉的沟通能力(AOR = 1.19,CI = 1.01-1.41)--与总是共同处方的可能性增加有关:研究结果支持理论(尤其是 TPB)在解释初级保健医生共同处方意愿和社区药剂师讨论共同配发纳洛酮意愿方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A theoretical explanation of naloxone provision among primary care physicians and community pharmacists in Tennessee

Background

Increasing access to naloxone reduces opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Primary care and community pharmacy settings are critical access points, yet limited theoretical research has examined naloxone prescribing and dispensing behaviors.

Objectives

To determine if the theory of planned behavior (TPB) combined with theoretical constructs from communication science explains intentions to co-prescribe and discuss co-dispensing naloxone among primary care physicians and community pharmacists, respectively.

Methods

This cross-sectional study surveyed cohorts of licensed primary care physicians and community pharmacists in Tennessee in 2017. Intentions were measured using profession-specific case vignettes, whereby they were asked given 10 similar patients, how many times (0–10) would they co-prescribe or discuss co-dispensing naloxone. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used.

Results

The analytic sample included 295 physicians (response rate = 15.6 %) and 423 pharmacists (response rate = 19.4 %). Approximately 65 % of physicians reported never intending to co-prescribe naloxone (0 out of 10 patients), while 47 % of pharmacists reported never intending to discuss co-dispensing. All TPB constructs—attitudes (AOR = 1.32, CI = 1.16–1.50), subjective norms (AOR = 1.17, CI = 1.06–1.30), and perceived behavioral control (AOR 1.16, CI = 1.02–1.33)—were associated with an increased likelihood of pharmacists always (versus never) discussing co-dispensing. Similarly, two TPB constructs—attitudes (AOR = 1.41, CI = 1.19–1.68) and subjective norms (AOR = 1.22, CI = 1.08–1.39)—were associated with an increased likelihood of physicians always co-prescribing. Among physicians only, one communication construct—self-perceived communication competence (AOR = 1.19, CI = 1.01–1.41)—was associated with an increased likelihood of always co-prescribing.

Conclusion

Findings support the value of theory, particularly TPB, in explaining primary care physician intentions to co-prescribe and community pharmacist intentions to discuss co-dispensing naloxone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
The association between patient self-reported experiences with medication discharge counselling and hospital readmissions: A cross-sectional analysis of a population-based survey. Enhancing older Veterans' care: Insights from medication reviews and deprescribing interventions. Development and evaluation of a model to identify publications on the clinical impact of pharmacist interventions. A graphical model to make explicit pharmacist clinical reasoning during medication review. Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1