Sharif Garra, Zachary I. Li, Jairo Triana, Ian Savage-Elliott, Michael R. Moore, Ajay Kanakamedala, Kirk Campbell, Michael Alaia, Eric J. Strauss, Laith M. Jazrawi
{"title":"胫骨长度对影像学胫骨后斜度测量的影响:我们需要多少胫骨?","authors":"Sharif Garra, Zachary I. Li, Jairo Triana, Ian Savage-Elliott, Michael R. Moore, Ajay Kanakamedala, Kirk Campbell, Michael Alaia, Eric J. Strauss, Laith M. Jazrawi","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist when comparing posterior tibial slope (PTS) measured using increasing lengths of the tibia to determine the anatomical axis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with full-length weight-bearing tibial radiographs were retrospectively identified from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if there was any previous history of lower extremity fracture or osteotomy. The anatomical axis of the tibia was determined using the full length of tibial radiographs, and the “reference PTS” was measured using this axis. Using the same radiograph, the PTS was measured using four different anatomical axes at standardized tibial lengths. While the center of the proximal circle remained constant at 5-cm below the tibial plateau, the center of the distal circle was drawn at four points: a) overlapping circles; b) 10-cm distal to the tibial plateau; c) 15-cm distal to the tibial plateau; d) half the length of the tibia, measured from the tibial plateau to the tibial plafond. Bivariate correlation and frequency distribution analysis (measurements >2-degrees from reference PTS) were performed between the reference PTS and PTS measured at each of the four other lengths.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 154 patients (39.8 ± 17.4 years old, 44.2% male) were included in the final analysis. Measurements at each of the four tibial lengths were all significantly different from the reference PTS (<em>p</em> < 0.001). The correlation strength improved with increasing tibial length (overlapping: <em>R =</em> 0.681, 10-cm: <em>R =</em> 0.821, 15-cm: <em>R =</em> 0.937, and half-tibia: <em>R =</em> 0.963). The number of PTS measurements >2-degree absolute difference from the reference PTS decreased with increasing tibial length (overlapping: 40.3%, 10-cm: 24.0%, 15-cm: 26.0%, and half-tibia: 18.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Assessment of PTS is dependent on the length of the tibia utilized to obtain the anatomical axis. Accuracy and precision of PTS measurements improved with increasing length of tibia used to determine the anatomical axis.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Case series.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of tibial length on radiographic posterior tibial slope measurement: How much tibia do we need?\",\"authors\":\"Sharif Garra, Zachary I. Li, Jairo Triana, Ian Savage-Elliott, Michael R. Moore, Ajay Kanakamedala, Kirk Campbell, Michael Alaia, Eric J. Strauss, Laith M. Jazrawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist when comparing posterior tibial slope (PTS) measured using increasing lengths of the tibia to determine the anatomical axis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with full-length weight-bearing tibial radiographs were retrospectively identified from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if there was any previous history of lower extremity fracture or osteotomy. The anatomical axis of the tibia was determined using the full length of tibial radiographs, and the “reference PTS” was measured using this axis. Using the same radiograph, the PTS was measured using four different anatomical axes at standardized tibial lengths. While the center of the proximal circle remained constant at 5-cm below the tibial plateau, the center of the distal circle was drawn at four points: a) overlapping circles; b) 10-cm distal to the tibial plateau; c) 15-cm distal to the tibial plateau; d) half the length of the tibia, measured from the tibial plateau to the tibial plafond. Bivariate correlation and frequency distribution analysis (measurements >2-degrees from reference PTS) were performed between the reference PTS and PTS measured at each of the four other lengths.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 154 patients (39.8 ± 17.4 years old, 44.2% male) were included in the final analysis. Measurements at each of the four tibial lengths were all significantly different from the reference PTS (<em>p</em> < 0.001). The correlation strength improved with increasing tibial length (overlapping: <em>R =</em> 0.681, 10-cm: <em>R =</em> 0.821, 15-cm: <em>R =</em> 0.937, and half-tibia: <em>R =</em> 0.963). The number of PTS measurements >2-degree absolute difference from the reference PTS decreased with increasing tibial length (overlapping: 40.3%, 10-cm: 24.0%, 15-cm: 26.0%, and half-tibia: 18.8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Assessment of PTS is dependent on the length of the tibia utilized to obtain the anatomical axis. Accuracy and precision of PTS measurements improved with increasing length of tibia used to determine the anatomical axis.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Case series.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 167-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024000851\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024000851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The influence of tibial length on radiographic posterior tibial slope measurement: How much tibia do we need?
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist when comparing posterior tibial slope (PTS) measured using increasing lengths of the tibia to determine the anatomical axis.
Methods
Patients with full-length weight-bearing tibial radiographs were retrospectively identified from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if there was any previous history of lower extremity fracture or osteotomy. The anatomical axis of the tibia was determined using the full length of tibial radiographs, and the “reference PTS” was measured using this axis. Using the same radiograph, the PTS was measured using four different anatomical axes at standardized tibial lengths. While the center of the proximal circle remained constant at 5-cm below the tibial plateau, the center of the distal circle was drawn at four points: a) overlapping circles; b) 10-cm distal to the tibial plateau; c) 15-cm distal to the tibial plateau; d) half the length of the tibia, measured from the tibial plateau to the tibial plafond. Bivariate correlation and frequency distribution analysis (measurements >2-degrees from reference PTS) were performed between the reference PTS and PTS measured at each of the four other lengths.
Results
A total of 154 patients (39.8 ± 17.4 years old, 44.2% male) were included in the final analysis. Measurements at each of the four tibial lengths were all significantly different from the reference PTS (p < 0.001). The correlation strength improved with increasing tibial length (overlapping: R = 0.681, 10-cm: R = 0.821, 15-cm: R = 0.937, and half-tibia: R = 0.963). The number of PTS measurements >2-degree absolute difference from the reference PTS decreased with increasing tibial length (overlapping: 40.3%, 10-cm: 24.0%, 15-cm: 26.0%, and half-tibia: 18.8%).
Conclusion
Assessment of PTS is dependent on the length of the tibia utilized to obtain the anatomical axis. Accuracy and precision of PTS measurements improved with increasing length of tibia used to determine the anatomical axis.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.