利用自然语言处理以可解释的方式提取随机对照试验的样本量

Paul Windisch, Fabio Dennstaedt, Carole Koechli, Robert Foerster, Christina Schroeder, Daniel M. Aebersold, Daniel R. Zwahlen
{"title":"利用自然语言处理以可解释的方式提取随机对照试验的样本量","authors":"Paul Windisch, Fabio Dennstaedt, Carole Koechli, Robert Foerster, Christina Schroeder, Daniel M. Aebersold, Daniel R. Zwahlen","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extracting the sample size from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains a challenge to developing better search functionalities or automating systematic reviews. Most current approaches rely on the sample size being explicitly mentioned in the abstract. Methods: 847 RCTs from high-impact medical journals were tagged with six different entities that could indicate the sample size. A named entity recognition (NER) model was trained to extract the entities and then deployed on a test set of 150 RCTs. The entities' performance in predicting the actual number of trial participants who were randomized was assessed and possible combinations of the entities were evaluated to create predictive models.\nResults: The most accurate model could make predictions for 64.7% of trials in the test set, and the resulting predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 96.9% of cases. A less strict model could make a prediction for 96.0% of trials, and its predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 88.2% of cases.\nConclusion: Training a named entity recognition model to predict the sample size from randomized controlled trials is feasible, not only if the sample size is explicitly mentioned but also if the sample size can be calculated, e.g., by adding up the number of patients in each arm.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracting the Sample Size From Randomized Controlled Trials in Explainable Fashion Using Natural Language Processing\",\"authors\":\"Paul Windisch, Fabio Dennstaedt, Carole Koechli, Robert Foerster, Christina Schroeder, Daniel M. Aebersold, Daniel R. Zwahlen\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Extracting the sample size from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains a challenge to developing better search functionalities or automating systematic reviews. Most current approaches rely on the sample size being explicitly mentioned in the abstract. Methods: 847 RCTs from high-impact medical journals were tagged with six different entities that could indicate the sample size. A named entity recognition (NER) model was trained to extract the entities and then deployed on a test set of 150 RCTs. The entities' performance in predicting the actual number of trial participants who were randomized was assessed and possible combinations of the entities were evaluated to create predictive models.\\nResults: The most accurate model could make predictions for 64.7% of trials in the test set, and the resulting predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 96.9% of cases. A less strict model could make a prediction for 96.0% of trials, and its predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 88.2% of cases.\\nConclusion: Training a named entity recognition model to predict the sample size from randomized controlled trials is feasible, not only if the sample size is explicitly mentioned but also if the sample size can be calculated, e.g., by adding up the number of patients in each arm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从随机对照试验(RCT)中提取样本量仍然是开发更好的搜索功能或自动进行系统综述所面临的挑战。目前大多数方法都依赖于摘要中明确提及的样本量。方法:对来自高影响力医学期刊的 847 篇随机对照试验进行标记,标记中包含六种不同的实体,这些实体可以表明样本量。对命名实体识别(NER)模型进行了提取实体的训练,然后将其部署在由 150 份 RCT 组成的测试集上。评估了实体在预测实际随机试验参与者人数方面的性能,并对实体的可能组合进行了评估,以创建预测模型:结果:最准确的模型可以对测试集中 64.7% 的试验进行预测,所得出的预测结果在 96.9% 的情况下都在基本事实的 10% 以内。一个不那么严格的模型可以对 96.0% 的试验做出预测,其预测结果在 88.2% 的情况下在地面实况的 10% 以内:结论:通过训练命名实体识别模型来预测随机对照试验的样本量是可行的,不仅要明确提及样本量,而且要能计算出样本量,例如,通过将每个臂中的患者人数相加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extracting the Sample Size From Randomized Controlled Trials in Explainable Fashion Using Natural Language Processing
Background: Extracting the sample size from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains a challenge to developing better search functionalities or automating systematic reviews. Most current approaches rely on the sample size being explicitly mentioned in the abstract. Methods: 847 RCTs from high-impact medical journals were tagged with six different entities that could indicate the sample size. A named entity recognition (NER) model was trained to extract the entities and then deployed on a test set of 150 RCTs. The entities' performance in predicting the actual number of trial participants who were randomized was assessed and possible combinations of the entities were evaluated to create predictive models. Results: The most accurate model could make predictions for 64.7% of trials in the test set, and the resulting predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 96.9% of cases. A less strict model could make a prediction for 96.0% of trials, and its predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 88.2% of cases. Conclusion: Training a named entity recognition model to predict the sample size from randomized controlled trials is feasible, not only if the sample size is explicitly mentioned but also if the sample size can be calculated, e.g., by adding up the number of patients in each arm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case is not a case is not a case - challenges and solutions in determining urolithiasis caseloads using the digital infrastructure of a clinical data warehouse Reliable Online Auditory Cognitive Testing: An observational study Federated Multiple Imputation for Variables that Are Missing Not At Random in Distributed Electronic Health Records Characterizing the connection between Parkinson's disease progression and healthcare utilization Generative AI and Large Language Models in Reducing Medication Related Harm and Adverse Drug Events - A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1