中低收入国家斯里兰卡北部成人哮喘吸入疗法的有效性:前瞻性观察研究

Yalini G Guruparan, Thiyahiny S Navaratinaraja, Gowry Selvaratnam, Shalini Sri Ranganathan
{"title":"中低收入国家斯里兰卡北部成人哮喘吸入疗法的有效性:前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Yalini G Guruparan, Thiyahiny S Navaratinaraja, Gowry Selvaratnam, Shalini Sri Ranganathan","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.08.24309593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Currently inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone, or in combined with inhaled long- acting beta2-agonist (LABA) is recommended for chronic asthma.\nObjective This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of inhaled therapies in a cohort of adult patients with asthma who were receiving treatment in a tertiary hospital in the Northern Sri Lanka. Methods A prospective cohort study was carried out among adult patients with asthma on inhaled medications for at least three months. Participants were followed up for six months with two follow-up interviews three months apart. Primary outcome measure was asthma control which was assessed by a locally validated asthma control patient-reported outcome measure (AC-PROM). Secondary outcome measures were use of short-acting beta2-agonists, number of nebulisations and number of hospitalisations. Chi-squared test was used to determine the significance of differences in outcome measures between the two groups. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between asthma control and socio-demographic factors. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\nResults Data from 1094 participants were analysed. Majority were females (73%) and belonged to age group >60 years (60%). Ratio between ICS monotherapy and combined therapy with ICS and LABA (ICS/LABA) was 3:1. A progressive improvement in asthma control was observed in both groups which was significant in those on ICS monotherapy (p<0.001). A significant reduction was also observed in overuse of short-acting beta2-agonist (p<0.001) and number of nebulisations (p=0.027) in participants on ICS monotherapy. No significant association between asthma control and socio-demographic factors was found in either group. Conclusions Both ICS monotherapy and ICS/LABA were effective. However, treatment package comprising regular ICS plus non-pharmacological approaches would be more realistic and cost-effective treatment strategy in the local context. Considering the low availability and current economic status of Sri Lanka, ICS/LABA could be reserved for poorly controlled asthma.","PeriodicalId":501074,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of inhaled therapies in asthma among adults in Northern Sri Lanka, a low and middle-income country: A prospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Yalini G Guruparan, Thiyahiny S Navaratinaraja, Gowry Selvaratnam, Shalini Sri Ranganathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.08.24309593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Currently inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone, or in combined with inhaled long- acting beta2-agonist (LABA) is recommended for chronic asthma.\\nObjective This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of inhaled therapies in a cohort of adult patients with asthma who were receiving treatment in a tertiary hospital in the Northern Sri Lanka. Methods A prospective cohort study was carried out among adult patients with asthma on inhaled medications for at least three months. Participants were followed up for six months with two follow-up interviews three months apart. Primary outcome measure was asthma control which was assessed by a locally validated asthma control patient-reported outcome measure (AC-PROM). Secondary outcome measures were use of short-acting beta2-agonists, number of nebulisations and number of hospitalisations. Chi-squared test was used to determine the significance of differences in outcome measures between the two groups. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between asthma control and socio-demographic factors. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\\nResults Data from 1094 participants were analysed. Majority were females (73%) and belonged to age group >60 years (60%). Ratio between ICS monotherapy and combined therapy with ICS and LABA (ICS/LABA) was 3:1. A progressive improvement in asthma control was observed in both groups which was significant in those on ICS monotherapy (p<0.001). A significant reduction was also observed in overuse of short-acting beta2-agonist (p<0.001) and number of nebulisations (p=0.027) in participants on ICS monotherapy. No significant association between asthma control and socio-demographic factors was found in either group. Conclusions Both ICS monotherapy and ICS/LABA were effective. However, treatment package comprising regular ICS plus non-pharmacological approaches would be more realistic and cost-effective treatment strategy in the local context. Considering the low availability and current economic status of Sri Lanka, ICS/LABA could be reserved for poorly controlled asthma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.08.24309593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.08.24309593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 目前,慢性哮喘推荐单独使用吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)或与吸入长效β2-受体激动剂(LABA)联合使用。方法 对吸入药物治疗至少三个月的成年哮喘患者进行前瞻性队列研究。对参与者进行了为期 6 个月的随访,两次随访相隔 3 个月。主要结果指标是哮喘控制情况,通过当地验证的哮喘控制情况患者报告结果指标(AC-PROM)进行评估。次要结果指标是短效β2-激动剂的使用、雾化次数和住院次数。采用卡方检验来确定两组间结果指标差异的显著性。为确定哮喘控制与社会人口因素之间的关系,采用了逻辑回归法。结果 分析了 1094 名参与者的数据。大部分为女性(73%),年龄在 60 岁以下(60%)。ICS 单一疗法与 ICS 和 LABA(ICS/LABA)联合疗法的比例为 3:1。两组患者的哮喘控制情况都得到了逐步改善,其中单用 ICS 治疗的效果显著(p<0.001)。在接受 ICS 单一疗法的患者中,短效 beta2- 激动剂的过度使用(p<0.001)和雾化次数(p=0.027)也明显减少。两组患者的哮喘控制情况均与社会人口因素无明显关联。结论 ICS 单一疗法和 ICS/LABA 均有效。然而,在当地情况下,由常规 ICS 加非药物疗法组成的一揽子治疗方案将是更现实、更经济的治疗策略。考虑到斯里兰卡哮喘患者较少且目前的经济状况,ICS/LABA 可用于控制不佳的哮喘患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of inhaled therapies in asthma among adults in Northern Sri Lanka, a low and middle-income country: A prospective observational study
Background Currently inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone, or in combined with inhaled long- acting beta2-agonist (LABA) is recommended for chronic asthma. Objective This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of inhaled therapies in a cohort of adult patients with asthma who were receiving treatment in a tertiary hospital in the Northern Sri Lanka. Methods A prospective cohort study was carried out among adult patients with asthma on inhaled medications for at least three months. Participants were followed up for six months with two follow-up interviews three months apart. Primary outcome measure was asthma control which was assessed by a locally validated asthma control patient-reported outcome measure (AC-PROM). Secondary outcome measures were use of short-acting beta2-agonists, number of nebulisations and number of hospitalisations. Chi-squared test was used to determine the significance of differences in outcome measures between the two groups. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between asthma control and socio-demographic factors. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Data from 1094 participants were analysed. Majority were females (73%) and belonged to age group >60 years (60%). Ratio between ICS monotherapy and combined therapy with ICS and LABA (ICS/LABA) was 3:1. A progressive improvement in asthma control was observed in both groups which was significant in those on ICS monotherapy (p<0.001). A significant reduction was also observed in overuse of short-acting beta2-agonist (p<0.001) and number of nebulisations (p=0.027) in participants on ICS monotherapy. No significant association between asthma control and socio-demographic factors was found in either group. Conclusions Both ICS monotherapy and ICS/LABA were effective. However, treatment package comprising regular ICS plus non-pharmacological approaches would be more realistic and cost-effective treatment strategy in the local context. Considering the low availability and current economic status of Sri Lanka, ICS/LABA could be reserved for poorly controlled asthma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building and validating a predictive model for stroke risk in Chinese community-dwelling patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using machine learning methods CORELSA - Remote stethoscope system for fast and standardized auscultations of large numbers of patients with respiratory syndromes The post-viral GPNMB+ immune niche persists in long-term Covid, asthma, and COPD Lung functions among children and adolescents with sickle cell disease receiving care at Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital Kisumu, Kenya BMI-related Genetic Factors and COPD Imaging Phenotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1