促进 LLM 辅助诊断:10 分钟 LLM 教程提高放射科住院医师的脑 MRI 解释能力

Su Hwan Kim, Severin Schramm, Jonas Wihl, Philipp Raffler, Marlene Tahedl, Julian Canisius, Ina Luiken, Lukas Endroes, Stefan Reischl, Alexander Marka, Robert Walter, Mathias Schillmaier, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, Dennis Martin Hedderich
{"title":"促进 LLM 辅助诊断:10 分钟 LLM 教程提高放射科住院医师的脑 MRI 解释能力","authors":"Su Hwan Kim, Severin Schramm, Jonas Wihl, Philipp Raffler, Marlene Tahedl, Julian Canisius, Ina Luiken, Lukas Endroes, Stefan Reischl, Alexander Marka, Robert Walter, Mathias Schillmaier, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, Dennis Martin Hedderich","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nTo evaluate the impact of a structured tutorial on the use of a large language model (LLM)-based search engine on radiology residents' performance in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis. Materials & Methods\nIn this retrospective study, nine radiology residents determined the three most likely differential diagnoses for three sets of ten brain MRI cases with a challenging yet definite diagnosis. Each set of cases was assessed 1) with the support of conventional internet search, 2) using an LLM-based search engine (© Perplexity AI) without prior training, or 3) with LLM assistance after a structured 10-minute tutorial on how to effectively use the tool for differential diagnosis. The tutorial content was based on the results of two studies on LLM-assisted radiological diagnosis and included a prompt template. Reader responses were rated using a binary and numeric scoring system. Reading times were tracked and confidence levels were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Binary and numeric scores were analyzed using chi-square tests and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests each. Search engine logs were examined to quantify user interaction metrics, and to identify hallucinations and misinterpretations in LLM responses. Results\nRadiology residents achieved the highest accuracy when employing the LLM-based search engine following the tutorial, indicating the correct diagnosis among the top three differential diagnoses in 62.5% of cases (55/88). This was followed by the LLM-assisted workflow before the tutorial (44.8%; 39/87) and the conventional internet search workflow (32.2%; 28/87). The LLM tutorial led to significantly higher performance (binary scores: p = 0.042, numeric scores: p = 0.016) and confidence (p = 0.006) but resulted in no relevant differences in reading times. Hallucinations were found in 5.1% of LLM queries. Conclusion\nA structured 10-minute LLM tutorial increased performance and confidence levels in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis among radiology residents.","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting LLM-Assisted Diagnosis: 10-Minute LLM Tutorial Elevates Radiology Residents' Performance in Brain MRI Interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Su Hwan Kim, Severin Schramm, Jonas Wihl, Philipp Raffler, Marlene Tahedl, Julian Canisius, Ina Luiken, Lukas Endroes, Stefan Reischl, Alexander Marka, Robert Walter, Mathias Schillmaier, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler, Dennis Martin Hedderich\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.03.24309779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nTo evaluate the impact of a structured tutorial on the use of a large language model (LLM)-based search engine on radiology residents' performance in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis. Materials & Methods\\nIn this retrospective study, nine radiology residents determined the three most likely differential diagnoses for three sets of ten brain MRI cases with a challenging yet definite diagnosis. Each set of cases was assessed 1) with the support of conventional internet search, 2) using an LLM-based search engine (© Perplexity AI) without prior training, or 3) with LLM assistance after a structured 10-minute tutorial on how to effectively use the tool for differential diagnosis. The tutorial content was based on the results of two studies on LLM-assisted radiological diagnosis and included a prompt template. Reader responses were rated using a binary and numeric scoring system. Reading times were tracked and confidence levels were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Binary and numeric scores were analyzed using chi-square tests and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests each. Search engine logs were examined to quantify user interaction metrics, and to identify hallucinations and misinterpretations in LLM responses. Results\\nRadiology residents achieved the highest accuracy when employing the LLM-based search engine following the tutorial, indicating the correct diagnosis among the top three differential diagnoses in 62.5% of cases (55/88). This was followed by the LLM-assisted workflow before the tutorial (44.8%; 39/87) and the conventional internet search workflow (32.2%; 28/87). The LLM tutorial led to significantly higher performance (binary scores: p = 0.042, numeric scores: p = 0.016) and confidence (p = 0.006) but resulted in no relevant differences in reading times. Hallucinations were found in 5.1% of LLM queries. Conclusion\\nA structured 10-minute LLM tutorial increased performance and confidence levels in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis among radiology residents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.24309779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.03.24309779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估基于大语言模型(LLM)搜索引擎的结构化教程对放射科住院医师在 LLM 辅助下进行脑部 MRI 鉴别诊断的影响。材料& 方法在这项回顾性研究中,九名放射科住院医师为三组十个脑部 MRI 病例确定了三个最有可能的鉴别诊断,这些病例的诊断具有挑战性但又是明确的。每组病例的评估方式包括:1)在传统互联网搜索的支持下进行评估;2)使用基于 LLM 的搜索引擎(© Perplexity AI)进行评估,无需事先接受培训;或 3)在 LLM 的协助下,接受 10 分钟的结构化教程,了解如何有效使用该工具进行鉴别诊断。教程内容基于两项关于 LLM 辅助放射诊断的研究结果,并包含一个提示模板。使用二进制和数字评分系统对读者的回答进行评分。对阅读时间进行跟踪,并以 5 点李克特量表记录信心水平。二进制和数字评分分别采用卡方检验和成对曼-惠特尼U检验进行分析。对搜索引擎日志进行了检查,以量化用户交互指标,并识别 LLM 回复中的幻觉和误解。结果 放射科住院医师在按照教程使用基于 LLM 的搜索引擎时,准确率最高,62.5% 的病例(55/88)在前三个鉴别诊断中给出了正确诊断。其次是教程前的 LLM 辅助工作流程(44.8%;39/87)和传统的互联网搜索工作流程(32.2%;28/87)。LLM 辅导显著提高了成绩(二进制分数:p = 0.042,数字分数:p = 0.016)和信心(p = 0.006),但在阅读时间上没有相关差异。在 5.1% 的 LLM 查询中发现了幻觉。结论 10 分钟结构化 LLM 教程提高了放射学住院医师在 LLM 辅助脑 MRI 鉴别诊断中的表现和信心水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boosting LLM-Assisted Diagnosis: 10-Minute LLM Tutorial Elevates Radiology Residents' Performance in Brain MRI Interpretation
Purpose To evaluate the impact of a structured tutorial on the use of a large language model (LLM)-based search engine on radiology residents' performance in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis. Materials & Methods In this retrospective study, nine radiology residents determined the three most likely differential diagnoses for three sets of ten brain MRI cases with a challenging yet definite diagnosis. Each set of cases was assessed 1) with the support of conventional internet search, 2) using an LLM-based search engine (© Perplexity AI) without prior training, or 3) with LLM assistance after a structured 10-minute tutorial on how to effectively use the tool for differential diagnosis. The tutorial content was based on the results of two studies on LLM-assisted radiological diagnosis and included a prompt template. Reader responses were rated using a binary and numeric scoring system. Reading times were tracked and confidence levels were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Binary and numeric scores were analyzed using chi-square tests and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests each. Search engine logs were examined to quantify user interaction metrics, and to identify hallucinations and misinterpretations in LLM responses. Results Radiology residents achieved the highest accuracy when employing the LLM-based search engine following the tutorial, indicating the correct diagnosis among the top three differential diagnoses in 62.5% of cases (55/88). This was followed by the LLM-assisted workflow before the tutorial (44.8%; 39/87) and the conventional internet search workflow (32.2%; 28/87). The LLM tutorial led to significantly higher performance (binary scores: p = 0.042, numeric scores: p = 0.016) and confidence (p = 0.006) but resulted in no relevant differences in reading times. Hallucinations were found in 5.1% of LLM queries. Conclusion A structured 10-minute LLM tutorial increased performance and confidence levels in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis among radiology residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auto-segmentation of hemi-diaphragms in free-breathing dynamic MRI of pediatric subjects with thoracic insufficiency syndrome Dynamic MR of muscle contraction during electrical muscle stimulation as a potential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disease Deriving Imaging Biomarkers for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Deep Learning Exploring subthreshold functional network alterations in women with phenylketonuria by higher criticism Beyond Algorithms: The Impact of Simplified CNN Models and Multifactorial Influences on Radiological Image Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1