Johanna Sunde, John Askling, Oskar Kindvall, Victor Johansson, Markus Franzén
{"title":"未来森林演替对三种濒危蝴蝶物种的负面影响","authors":"Johanna Sunde, John Askling, Oskar Kindvall, Victor Johansson, Markus Franzén","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02892-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The dynamic interplay between anthropogenic activities and biodiversity conservation necessitates a nuanced understanding of habitat change, especially in contexts marked by transitions from grasslands to forested areas. This investigation utilised three threatened butterfly species—the Marsh Fritillary, Apollo, and Large Blue—as models to explore how grassland associated species respond to altered environmental conditions. The methodology encompassed extensive field surveys and statistical analyses with ecological niche modelling to determine their current and future distributions on the Island of Gotland. The species were surveyed under distinct years from 2017 to 2020 in a total of 3333 hectares in a 6000 hectare area—the Marsh Fritillary in 2017 (1232 hectares), Apollo in 2019 (2346 hectares), and Large Blue in 2020 (2256 hectares). Results revealed that the estimated current extents of suitable habitats were 49,104 hectares for the Marsh Fritillary (15.6% of the island), 45,646 hectares for Apollo (14.5%), and 33,089 hectares for Large Blue (10.5%). In general, increased forest and shrub cover and decreased heterogeneity negatively affected butterfly occupancy, but each species exhibited unique habitat preferences. The predictive modelling demonstrated that continued succession would reduce the amount of habitats predicted to be suitable and generated alarming forecasts—a twofold increase in forest and shrub cover suggests habitat declines of 41%, 47%, and 65% for the Marsh Fritillary, Apollo, and Large Blue, respectively. Given these findings, proactive measures are imperative for strategically managing these habitats to preserve landscape heterogeneity and accommodate diverse ecological needs. This study is important to conservation management providing, crucial insights amid anthropogenic and ecological changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative impacts of future forest succession on three threatened butterfly species\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Sunde, John Askling, Oskar Kindvall, Victor Johansson, Markus Franzén\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10531-024-02892-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The dynamic interplay between anthropogenic activities and biodiversity conservation necessitates a nuanced understanding of habitat change, especially in contexts marked by transitions from grasslands to forested areas. This investigation utilised three threatened butterfly species—the Marsh Fritillary, Apollo, and Large Blue—as models to explore how grassland associated species respond to altered environmental conditions. The methodology encompassed extensive field surveys and statistical analyses with ecological niche modelling to determine their current and future distributions on the Island of Gotland. The species were surveyed under distinct years from 2017 to 2020 in a total of 3333 hectares in a 6000 hectare area—the Marsh Fritillary in 2017 (1232 hectares), Apollo in 2019 (2346 hectares), and Large Blue in 2020 (2256 hectares). Results revealed that the estimated current extents of suitable habitats were 49,104 hectares for the Marsh Fritillary (15.6% of the island), 45,646 hectares for Apollo (14.5%), and 33,089 hectares for Large Blue (10.5%). In general, increased forest and shrub cover and decreased heterogeneity negatively affected butterfly occupancy, but each species exhibited unique habitat preferences. The predictive modelling demonstrated that continued succession would reduce the amount of habitats predicted to be suitable and generated alarming forecasts—a twofold increase in forest and shrub cover suggests habitat declines of 41%, 47%, and 65% for the Marsh Fritillary, Apollo, and Large Blue, respectively. Given these findings, proactive measures are imperative for strategically managing these habitats to preserve landscape heterogeneity and accommodate diverse ecological needs. This study is important to conservation management providing, crucial insights amid anthropogenic and ecological changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02892-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02892-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Negative impacts of future forest succession on three threatened butterfly species
The dynamic interplay between anthropogenic activities and biodiversity conservation necessitates a nuanced understanding of habitat change, especially in contexts marked by transitions from grasslands to forested areas. This investigation utilised three threatened butterfly species—the Marsh Fritillary, Apollo, and Large Blue—as models to explore how grassland associated species respond to altered environmental conditions. The methodology encompassed extensive field surveys and statistical analyses with ecological niche modelling to determine their current and future distributions on the Island of Gotland. The species were surveyed under distinct years from 2017 to 2020 in a total of 3333 hectares in a 6000 hectare area—the Marsh Fritillary in 2017 (1232 hectares), Apollo in 2019 (2346 hectares), and Large Blue in 2020 (2256 hectares). Results revealed that the estimated current extents of suitable habitats were 49,104 hectares for the Marsh Fritillary (15.6% of the island), 45,646 hectares for Apollo (14.5%), and 33,089 hectares for Large Blue (10.5%). In general, increased forest and shrub cover and decreased heterogeneity negatively affected butterfly occupancy, but each species exhibited unique habitat preferences. The predictive modelling demonstrated that continued succession would reduce the amount of habitats predicted to be suitable and generated alarming forecasts—a twofold increase in forest and shrub cover suggests habitat declines of 41%, 47%, and 65% for the Marsh Fritillary, Apollo, and Large Blue, respectively. Given these findings, proactive measures are imperative for strategically managing these habitats to preserve landscape heterogeneity and accommodate diverse ecological needs. This study is important to conservation management providing, crucial insights amid anthropogenic and ecological changes.
期刊介绍:
Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms.
The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.