量子准对接中的 COSMO 水模型比较

IF 1.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Physics of Wave Phenomena Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.3103/S1541308X2470016X
D. C. Kutov, A. V. Sulimov, V. B. Sulimov
{"title":"量子准对接中的 COSMO 水模型比较","authors":"D. C. Kutov,&nbsp;A. V. Sulimov,&nbsp;V. B. Sulimov","doi":"10.3103/S1541308X2470016X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two solvent models, COSMO (old parametrization) and COSMO2 (new parametrization) are compared for a set of protein–ligand complexes in quantum quasi-docking, which is two-stage docking: positioning of a ligand in a target protein and calculation of binding enthalpy of the protein–ligand system using the PM7 quantum-chemical semiempirical method. In quantum quasi-docking, a wide spectrum of unique low-energy minima of the protein–ligand system is first found while employing the classical force field. Then energies of all these minima are recalculated within one of the continual models using the modern PM7 method with allowance for the solvent, and the global energy minimum is determined among the recalculated energies. The solution of the quantum quasi-docking problem is the position of the ligand in the protein corresponding to the global minimum of the protein–ligand system energy calculated by the quantum-chemical method with allowance for the solvent. Effectiveness of quantum quasi-docking is defined by the value (below 2 Å) of the root-mean-square deviation of ligand atoms from one another in two positions, namely, the position of the ligand in the protein corresponding to the calculated global energy minimum and the experimentally found crystallized position of the ligand with the protein. Comparison is performed for ten protein–ligand test complexes with well-defined structures taken from the Protein Data Bank, for which the ligand–protein binding enthalpy is measured and the positioning of the ligand in the protein is successful in quasi-docking within both solvent models used. In both methods, PM7 + COSMO and PM7 + COSMO2, a high correlation coefficient of the experimental and calculated ligand–protein binding enthalpy is obtained for both calculation techniques. Allowance for moveability of protein atoms in calculations of binding enthalpy leads to an increase in its negative values and to a slight decrease in the correlation coefficient of the experimental and calculated values. The role of hydrogen bonds between protein and ligand atoms is revealed: their contribution to binding enthalpy ranges from 14 to 24% for different complexes. The results indicate the way of implementing quantum docking so that the global minimum of the protein–ligand system energy calculated by the quantum-chemical technique is immediately obtained using the global optimization procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":732,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Wave Phenomena","volume":"32 3","pages":"196 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of COSMO Water Models in Quantum Quasi-Docking\",\"authors\":\"D. C. Kutov,&nbsp;A. V. Sulimov,&nbsp;V. B. Sulimov\",\"doi\":\"10.3103/S1541308X2470016X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two solvent models, COSMO (old parametrization) and COSMO2 (new parametrization) are compared for a set of protein–ligand complexes in quantum quasi-docking, which is two-stage docking: positioning of a ligand in a target protein and calculation of binding enthalpy of the protein–ligand system using the PM7 quantum-chemical semiempirical method. In quantum quasi-docking, a wide spectrum of unique low-energy minima of the protein–ligand system is first found while employing the classical force field. Then energies of all these minima are recalculated within one of the continual models using the modern PM7 method with allowance for the solvent, and the global energy minimum is determined among the recalculated energies. The solution of the quantum quasi-docking problem is the position of the ligand in the protein corresponding to the global minimum of the protein–ligand system energy calculated by the quantum-chemical method with allowance for the solvent. Effectiveness of quantum quasi-docking is defined by the value (below 2 Å) of the root-mean-square deviation of ligand atoms from one another in two positions, namely, the position of the ligand in the protein corresponding to the calculated global energy minimum and the experimentally found crystallized position of the ligand with the protein. Comparison is performed for ten protein–ligand test complexes with well-defined structures taken from the Protein Data Bank, for which the ligand–protein binding enthalpy is measured and the positioning of the ligand in the protein is successful in quasi-docking within both solvent models used. In both methods, PM7 + COSMO and PM7 + COSMO2, a high correlation coefficient of the experimental and calculated ligand–protein binding enthalpy is obtained for both calculation techniques. Allowance for moveability of protein atoms in calculations of binding enthalpy leads to an increase in its negative values and to a slight decrease in the correlation coefficient of the experimental and calculated values. The role of hydrogen bonds between protein and ligand atoms is revealed: their contribution to binding enthalpy ranges from 14 to 24% for different complexes. The results indicate the way of implementing quantum docking so that the global minimum of the protein–ligand system energy calculated by the quantum-chemical technique is immediately obtained using the global optimization procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics of Wave Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"196 - 202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics of Wave Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1541308X2470016X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Wave Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1541308X2470016X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在量子准对接中比较了COSMO(旧参数化)和COSMO2(新参数化)两种溶剂模型对一组蛋白质-配体复合物的影响。在量子准对接过程中,首先要利用经典力场找到蛋白质配体系统独特的低能量极小值。然后,使用现代 PM7 方法在一个连续模型中重新计算所有这些最小值的能量,并考虑溶剂因素,在重新计算的能量中确定全局能量最小值。量子准对接问题的解就是配体在蛋白质中的位置,该位置与量子化学方法计算出的蛋白质-配体系统能量的全局最小值相对应,并考虑了溶剂因素。量子准对接的有效性由配体原子在两个位置上的均方根偏差值(低于 2 Å)来定义,这两个位置分别是配体在蛋白质中与计算出的全局能量最小值相对应的位置,以及实验发现的配体与蛋白质的结晶位置。对蛋白质数据库中十个结构明确的蛋白质配体测试复合物进行了比较,测量了配体与蛋白质的结合焓,配体在蛋白质中的位置在所用的两种溶剂模型中都成功地进行了准对接。在 PM7 + COSMO 和 PM7 + COSMO2 两种方法中,两种计算技术的配体-蛋白质结合焓的实验值和计算值的相关系数都很高。如果在计算结合焓时考虑到蛋白质原子的可移动性,结合焓的负值会增加,实验值和计算值的相关系数会略有下降。蛋白质原子和配体原子之间氢键的作用得到了揭示:在不同的复合物中,氢键对结合焓的贡献从 14% 到 24% 不等。研究结果表明了量子对接的实施方法,即通过量子化学技术计算出的蛋白质-配体系统能量的全局最小值可以通过全局优化程序立即得到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of COSMO Water Models in Quantum Quasi-Docking

Two solvent models, COSMO (old parametrization) and COSMO2 (new parametrization) are compared for a set of protein–ligand complexes in quantum quasi-docking, which is two-stage docking: positioning of a ligand in a target protein and calculation of binding enthalpy of the protein–ligand system using the PM7 quantum-chemical semiempirical method. In quantum quasi-docking, a wide spectrum of unique low-energy minima of the protein–ligand system is first found while employing the classical force field. Then energies of all these minima are recalculated within one of the continual models using the modern PM7 method with allowance for the solvent, and the global energy minimum is determined among the recalculated energies. The solution of the quantum quasi-docking problem is the position of the ligand in the protein corresponding to the global minimum of the protein–ligand system energy calculated by the quantum-chemical method with allowance for the solvent. Effectiveness of quantum quasi-docking is defined by the value (below 2 Å) of the root-mean-square deviation of ligand atoms from one another in two positions, namely, the position of the ligand in the protein corresponding to the calculated global energy minimum and the experimentally found crystallized position of the ligand with the protein. Comparison is performed for ten protein–ligand test complexes with well-defined structures taken from the Protein Data Bank, for which the ligand–protein binding enthalpy is measured and the positioning of the ligand in the protein is successful in quasi-docking within both solvent models used. In both methods, PM7 + COSMO and PM7 + COSMO2, a high correlation coefficient of the experimental and calculated ligand–protein binding enthalpy is obtained for both calculation techniques. Allowance for moveability of protein atoms in calculations of binding enthalpy leads to an increase in its negative values and to a slight decrease in the correlation coefficient of the experimental and calculated values. The role of hydrogen bonds between protein and ligand atoms is revealed: their contribution to binding enthalpy ranges from 14 to 24% for different complexes. The results indicate the way of implementing quantum docking so that the global minimum of the protein–ligand system energy calculated by the quantum-chemical technique is immediately obtained using the global optimization procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics of Wave Phenomena
Physics of Wave Phenomena PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physics of Wave Phenomena publishes original contributions in general and nonlinear wave theory, original experimental results in optics, acoustics and radiophysics. The fields of physics represented in this journal include nonlinear optics, acoustics, and radiophysics; nonlinear effects of any nature including nonlinear dynamics and chaos; phase transitions including light- and sound-induced; laser physics; optical and other spectroscopies; new instruments, methods, and measurements of wave and oscillatory processes; remote sensing of waves in natural media; wave interactions in biophysics, econophysics and other cross-disciplinary areas.
期刊最新文献
Autocollimation Optical Doppler Velocimeter: Velocity Measurement of Hard-to-Access Objects Frequency Division Multiple Access with High Performance Based on Several Defect Resonators According to the Fibonacci Sequence in 1D Photonic Star Waveguide Structure Nonlinear Effects in Thermoacoustic Pressure Generation Mechanism—Analytic Models Adaptive Method for Holographic Processing of Broadband Hydroacoustic Signals 5-µm Lasing on Tb3+ Ions in a Chalcogenide Fiber Pumped by a 2.8-µm Er:ZBLAN Laser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1