{"title":"向前失败：跨学科人种学研究中写作的变革力量","authors":"Hanna Varvne, Mariana Andrei","doi":"10.1108/joe-01-2024-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>To address complex societal challenges, particularly in the context of climate change, there is a growing interest in employing interdisciplinary ethnographic research (IER). This paper examines the experiences associated with participating in IER, drawing insights from a collaboration project that integrates organization studies with energy management research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Within the context of a three-year interdisciplinary collaboration, the paper focuses on the performance of an interview and the analysis thereof. It draws from this example to highlight the difficulties in translating discipline-specific language and understanding failures in IER. Including an exploration of the process of recovery, involving analyzing research results and the subsequent collaborative writing of a paper.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The primary findings revolve around the challenges inherent in ethnography as an interdisciplinary method. These challenges include language barriers between disciplines and the complexities of comprehending and learning from failures in interdisciplinary research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The contribution lies in its exploration of abductive reasoning in IER, shedding light on the complexities and opportunities associated with interdisciplinary collaboration in the making. By emphasizing the importance of going into the field before negotiating common ground, the approach presented provides a unique perspective that not only addresses challenges but also facilitates the development of involved disciplines and scholars through self-reflection.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Highlights</h3>\n<p><ol list-type=\"order\"><li><p>The paper shows the importance of both expertise and experience knowledge in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.</p></li><li><p>By using different writing styles, the importance of language and translations between disciplines is exemplified.</p></li><li><p>The paper provides an example of how to engage in abductive reasoning in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.</p></li><li><p>The paper calls for a broad understanding of failure and success in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.</p></li></ol></p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Ethnography","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failing forward: the transformative power of writing in interdisciplinary ethnographic research\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Varvne, Mariana Andrei\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/joe-01-2024-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>To address complex societal challenges, particularly in the context of climate change, there is a growing interest in employing interdisciplinary ethnographic research (IER). This paper examines the experiences associated with participating in IER, drawing insights from a collaboration project that integrates organization studies with energy management research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Within the context of a three-year interdisciplinary collaboration, the paper focuses on the performance of an interview and the analysis thereof. It draws from this example to highlight the difficulties in translating discipline-specific language and understanding failures in IER. Including an exploration of the process of recovery, involving analyzing research results and the subsequent collaborative writing of a paper.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The primary findings revolve around the challenges inherent in ethnography as an interdisciplinary method. These challenges include language barriers between disciplines and the complexities of comprehending and learning from failures in interdisciplinary research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The contribution lies in its exploration of abductive reasoning in IER, shedding light on the complexities and opportunities associated with interdisciplinary collaboration in the making. By emphasizing the importance of going into the field before negotiating common ground, the approach presented provides a unique perspective that not only addresses challenges but also facilitates the development of involved disciplines and scholars through self-reflection.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Highlights</h3>\\n<p><ol list-type=\\\"order\\\"><li><p>The paper shows the importance of both expertise and experience knowledge in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.</p></li><li><p>By using different writing styles, the importance of language and translations between disciplines is exemplified.</p></li><li><p>The paper provides an example of how to engage in abductive reasoning in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.</p></li><li><p>The paper calls for a broad understanding of failure and success in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.</p></li></ol></p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":44924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Ethnography\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Ethnography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/joe-01-2024-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Ethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joe-01-2024-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Failing forward: the transformative power of writing in interdisciplinary ethnographic research
Purpose
To address complex societal challenges, particularly in the context of climate change, there is a growing interest in employing interdisciplinary ethnographic research (IER). This paper examines the experiences associated with participating in IER, drawing insights from a collaboration project that integrates organization studies with energy management research.
Design/methodology/approach
Within the context of a three-year interdisciplinary collaboration, the paper focuses on the performance of an interview and the analysis thereof. It draws from this example to highlight the difficulties in translating discipline-specific language and understanding failures in IER. Including an exploration of the process of recovery, involving analyzing research results and the subsequent collaborative writing of a paper.
Findings
The primary findings revolve around the challenges inherent in ethnography as an interdisciplinary method. These challenges include language barriers between disciplines and the complexities of comprehending and learning from failures in interdisciplinary research.
Originality/value
The contribution lies in its exploration of abductive reasoning in IER, shedding light on the complexities and opportunities associated with interdisciplinary collaboration in the making. By emphasizing the importance of going into the field before negotiating common ground, the approach presented provides a unique perspective that not only addresses challenges but also facilitates the development of involved disciplines and scholars through self-reflection.
Highlights
The paper shows the importance of both expertise and experience knowledge in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.
By using different writing styles, the importance of language and translations between disciplines is exemplified.
The paper provides an example of how to engage in abductive reasoning in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.
The paper calls for a broad understanding of failure and success in interdisciplinary ethnographic research.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Organizational Ethnography (JOE) has been launched to provide an opportunity for scholars, from all social and management science disciplines, to publish over two issues: -high-quality articles from original ethnographic research that contribute to the current and future development of qualitative intellectual knowledge and understanding of the nature of public and private sector work, organization and management -review articles examining the history and development of the contribution of ethnography to qualitative research in social, organization and management studies -articles examining the intellectual, pedagogical and practical use-value of ethnography in organization and management research, management education and management practice, or which extend, critique or challenge past and current theoretical and empirical knowledge claims within one or more of these areas of interest -articles on ethnographically informed research relating to the concepts of organization and organizing in any other wider social and cultural contexts.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
