长期 COVID 脑雾治疗:约束诱导认知疗法试点随机对照试验的结果

Gitendra Uswatte, Edward Taub, Karlene Ball, Brandon S Mitchell, Jason A Blake, Staci McKay, Fedora Biney, Olesya Iosipchuk, Piper Hempfling, Elise Harris, Anne Dickerson, Kristine Lokken, Amy J Knight, Victor W Mark, Shruti Agnihotri, Garry Cutter
{"title":"长期 COVID 脑雾治疗:约束诱导认知疗法试点随机对照试验的结果","authors":"Gitendra Uswatte, Edward Taub, Karlene Ball, Brandon S Mitchell, Jason A Blake, Staci McKay, Fedora Biney, Olesya Iosipchuk, Piper Hempfling, Elise Harris, Anne Dickerson, Kristine Lokken, Amy J Knight, Victor W Mark, Shruti Agnihotri, Garry Cutter","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.04.24309908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Long COVID brain fog is often disabling. Yet, no empirically-supported treatments exist. This study′s objectives were to evaluate feasibility and efficacy, provisionally, of a new rehabilitation approach, Constraint-Induced Cognitive Therapy (CICT), for post-COVID-19 cognitive sequelae.\nDesign: Sixteen community-residents ≥ 3-months post-COVID-19 infection with mild cognitive impairment and dysfunction in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were enrolled. Participants were randomized to Immediate-CICT or treatment-as-usual (TAU) with crossover to CICT. CICT combined behavior change techniques modified from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy with Speed of Processing Training, a computerized cognitive-training program. CICT was deemed feasible if (a)≥80% of participants completed treatment, (b) the same found treatment highly satisfying and at most moderately difficult, and (c) <2 study-related, serious adverse-events occurred. The primary outcome was IADL performance in daily life (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure). Employment status and brain fog (Mental Clutter Scale) were also assessed. Results: Fourteen completed Immediate-CICT (n=7) or TAU (n=7); two withdrew from TAU before their second testing session. Completers were [M (SD)]: 10 (7) months post-COVID; 51 (13) years old; 10 females, 4 males; 1 African American, 13 European American. All the feasibility benchmarks were met. Immediate-CICT, relative to TAU, produced very large improvements in IADL performance (M=3.7 points, p<.001, d=2.6) and brain fog (M=-4 points, p <.001, d=-2.9). Four of five non-retired Immediate-CICT participants returned-to-work post-treatment; no TAU participants did, p=.048. Conclusions: CICT has promise for reducing brain fog, improving IADL, and promoting returning-to-work in adults with Long COVID. Findings warrant a large-scale RCT with an active-comparison group.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long COVID Brain Fog Treatment: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Cognitive Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Gitendra Uswatte, Edward Taub, Karlene Ball, Brandon S Mitchell, Jason A Blake, Staci McKay, Fedora Biney, Olesya Iosipchuk, Piper Hempfling, Elise Harris, Anne Dickerson, Kristine Lokken, Amy J Knight, Victor W Mark, Shruti Agnihotri, Garry Cutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.04.24309908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Long COVID brain fog is often disabling. Yet, no empirically-supported treatments exist. This study′s objectives were to evaluate feasibility and efficacy, provisionally, of a new rehabilitation approach, Constraint-Induced Cognitive Therapy (CICT), for post-COVID-19 cognitive sequelae.\\nDesign: Sixteen community-residents ≥ 3-months post-COVID-19 infection with mild cognitive impairment and dysfunction in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were enrolled. Participants were randomized to Immediate-CICT or treatment-as-usual (TAU) with crossover to CICT. CICT combined behavior change techniques modified from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy with Speed of Processing Training, a computerized cognitive-training program. CICT was deemed feasible if (a)≥80% of participants completed treatment, (b) the same found treatment highly satisfying and at most moderately difficult, and (c) <2 study-related, serious adverse-events occurred. The primary outcome was IADL performance in daily life (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure). Employment status and brain fog (Mental Clutter Scale) were also assessed. Results: Fourteen completed Immediate-CICT (n=7) or TAU (n=7); two withdrew from TAU before their second testing session. Completers were [M (SD)]: 10 (7) months post-COVID; 51 (13) years old; 10 females, 4 males; 1 African American, 13 European American. All the feasibility benchmarks were met. Immediate-CICT, relative to TAU, produced very large improvements in IADL performance (M=3.7 points, p<.001, d=2.6) and brain fog (M=-4 points, p <.001, d=-2.9). Four of five non-retired Immediate-CICT participants returned-to-work post-treatment; no TAU participants did, p=.048. Conclusions: CICT has promise for reducing brain fog, improving IADL, and promoting returning-to-work in adults with Long COVID. Findings warrant a large-scale RCT with an active-comparison group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.04.24309908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.04.24309908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:长期的 COVID 脑雾通常会使人丧失能力。然而,目前还没有经验支持的治疗方法。本研究的目的是暂时评估一种新康复方法--约束诱导认知疗法(CICT)--治疗COVID-19后认知后遗症的可行性和有效性:16名感染COVID-19后≥3个月的社区居民被纳入研究,他们患有轻度认知障碍和日常生活工具性活动(IADL)功能障碍。参与者被随机分配到 "中期 CICT "或 "常规治疗(TAU)",并交叉到 "CICT"。CICT 结合了从 "约束诱导运动疗法"(Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy)改进而来的行为改变技术和 "处理速度训练"(Speed of Processing Training),后者是一种计算机化的认知训练计划。如果(a)≥80%的参与者完成了治疗,(b)相同的参与者认为治疗非常令人满意,而最多只是中度困难,以及(c)发生了2起与研究相关的严重不良事件,则认为CICT是可行的。主要结果是日常生活中的 IADL 表现(加拿大职业表现测量法)。此外,还对就业状况和脑雾(精神混乱量表)进行了评估。结果14人完成了Immediate-CICT(7人)或TAU(7人);2人在第二次测试前退出TAU。完成者的年龄[M(SD)]:COVID 后 10 (7) 个月;51 (13) 岁;10 名女性,4 名男性;1 名非洲裔美国人,13 名欧洲裔美国人。所有可行性基准均已达到。与 TAU 相比,Immediate-CICT 在 IADL 表现(M=3.7 分,p<.001,d=2.6)和脑雾(M=-4 分,p<.001,d=-2.9)方面有非常大的改善。五名未退休的 "中期-CICT "参与者中有四人在治疗后重返工作岗位;而 "TAU "参与者中没有人重返工作岗位,p=.048。结论CICT有望减轻脑雾、改善IADL,并促进长COVID成人患者重返工作岗位。研究结果证明,有必要进行大规模的 RCT 研究,并设立一个积极的比较组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long COVID Brain Fog Treatment: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Cognitive Therapy
Purpose: Long COVID brain fog is often disabling. Yet, no empirically-supported treatments exist. This study′s objectives were to evaluate feasibility and efficacy, provisionally, of a new rehabilitation approach, Constraint-Induced Cognitive Therapy (CICT), for post-COVID-19 cognitive sequelae. Design: Sixteen community-residents ≥ 3-months post-COVID-19 infection with mild cognitive impairment and dysfunction in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were enrolled. Participants were randomized to Immediate-CICT or treatment-as-usual (TAU) with crossover to CICT. CICT combined behavior change techniques modified from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy with Speed of Processing Training, a computerized cognitive-training program. CICT was deemed feasible if (a)≥80% of participants completed treatment, (b) the same found treatment highly satisfying and at most moderately difficult, and (c) <2 study-related, serious adverse-events occurred. The primary outcome was IADL performance in daily life (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure). Employment status and brain fog (Mental Clutter Scale) were also assessed. Results: Fourteen completed Immediate-CICT (n=7) or TAU (n=7); two withdrew from TAU before their second testing session. Completers were [M (SD)]: 10 (7) months post-COVID; 51 (13) years old; 10 females, 4 males; 1 African American, 13 European American. All the feasibility benchmarks were met. Immediate-CICT, relative to TAU, produced very large improvements in IADL performance (M=3.7 points, p<.001, d=2.6) and brain fog (M=-4 points, p <.001, d=-2.9). Four of five non-retired Immediate-CICT participants returned-to-work post-treatment; no TAU participants did, p=.048. Conclusions: CICT has promise for reducing brain fog, improving IADL, and promoting returning-to-work in adults with Long COVID. Findings warrant a large-scale RCT with an active-comparison group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS: INTERPRETATION OF NON-STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN REHABILITATION Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1