创伤性脑损伤晚期影响(LETBI)研究队列中的创伤性脑病综合征

Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Enna Selmanovic, Lisa Spielman, Ariel Pruyser, Ashlyn Bulas, Eric Watson, Jesse Mez, Jeanne M Hoffman
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤晚期影响(LETBI)研究队列中的创伤性脑病综合征","authors":"Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Enna Selmanovic, Lisa Spielman, Ariel Pruyser, Ashlyn Bulas, Eric Watson, Jesse Mez, Jeanne M Hoffman","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.04.24309955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Importance:</strong>Traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES),the suggested clinical manifestation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy(CTE),is believed to result from repetitive head impacts (RHI) and the prevalence of TES and its component symptoms have not been thoroughly investigated in individuals with single TBI.<strong>Objective:</strong>To use prospectively collected data to operationalize TES per consensus research diagnostic criteria and examine the rates of TES in a sample of individuals with isolated TBI, a subset of whom also had RHI exposure, and to determine whether any demographic or injury factors predicted likelihood of meeting TES diagnostic criteria.<strong>Design:</strong>295 participants from the Late Effects of TBI (LETBI) study had complete data for all key variables. The sample was categorized by TBI severity and presence of RHI history leading to 6 groups (those with isolated mild, moderate, and severe TBI, with and without RHI). Chi-squared tests were used to compare the proportion of each group that met each of the core clinical criteria overall TES diagnosis. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the associations of demographic and injury characteristics on TES diagnosis. Levels of functional dependence and levels of certainty for CTE neuropathology in the sample were characterized and applied with the core clinical features to explore consensus-based provisional levels of certainty of CTE pathology across study groups.<strong>Results:</strong> In addition to history of TBI, 141 (47.7%) participants had RHI exposure meeting the TES criteria exposure threshold. In the full sample, 56.9%, 33.2% and 45.7% of participants met TES core criterion of cognitive impairment, neurobehavioral dysregulation, and progressive course of clinical features, respectively. Overall, 15.2% of this LETBI sample had substantial RHI exposure and met all 3 clinical features, meeting consensus-based TES criteria. When RHI exposure criterion was lifted, 33.5% of the LETBI sample with isolated TBI met all core clinical criteria. No significant differences were found in clinical diagnostic criteria between individuals with and without RHI exposure. When exploring consensus-based Levels of Diagnostic Certainty, rates of suggestive, possible, and probable CTE were found to be 2.7%, 6.8%, and 5.8%, respectively. No injury or demographic variables significantly predicted the likelihood of meeting all 3 Core Clinical Criteria for TES.<strong>Conclusion:</strong>In this community based TBI sample, we found high rates of TES clinical features among those with and without RHI, across TBI across injury severity groups. Presence of TES core clinical features was greatest among those with isolated TBI, suggesting that chronic and sometimes progressive sequelae of TBI are similar to those described in TES, but may reflect a distinct pathobiological process from CTE neuropathologic change which is very rarely seen in isolated TBI. Findings emphasize the centrality of RHI exposure to the TES diagnostic criteria. Lifetime exposure to TBI and RHI should be well characterized in studies of TES and post-TBI neuropathologies to advance understanding of the underlying biology of progressive clinical symptoms. This work supports further refinement of TES diagnostic criteria, which will require defining RHI exposure thresholds associated with CTE neuropathologic change.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome in the Late Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury (LETBI) study cohort\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Enna Selmanovic, Lisa Spielman, Ariel Pruyser, Ashlyn Bulas, Eric Watson, Jesse Mez, Jeanne M Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.04.24309955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Importance:</strong>Traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES),the suggested clinical manifestation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy(CTE),is believed to result from repetitive head impacts (RHI) and the prevalence of TES and its component symptoms have not been thoroughly investigated in individuals with single TBI.<strong>Objective:</strong>To use prospectively collected data to operationalize TES per consensus research diagnostic criteria and examine the rates of TES in a sample of individuals with isolated TBI, a subset of whom also had RHI exposure, and to determine whether any demographic or injury factors predicted likelihood of meeting TES diagnostic criteria.<strong>Design:</strong>295 participants from the Late Effects of TBI (LETBI) study had complete data for all key variables. The sample was categorized by TBI severity and presence of RHI history leading to 6 groups (those with isolated mild, moderate, and severe TBI, with and without RHI). Chi-squared tests were used to compare the proportion of each group that met each of the core clinical criteria overall TES diagnosis. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the associations of demographic and injury characteristics on TES diagnosis. Levels of functional dependence and levels of certainty for CTE neuropathology in the sample were characterized and applied with the core clinical features to explore consensus-based provisional levels of certainty of CTE pathology across study groups.<strong>Results:</strong> In addition to history of TBI, 141 (47.7%) participants had RHI exposure meeting the TES criteria exposure threshold. In the full sample, 56.9%, 33.2% and 45.7% of participants met TES core criterion of cognitive impairment, neurobehavioral dysregulation, and progressive course of clinical features, respectively. Overall, 15.2% of this LETBI sample had substantial RHI exposure and met all 3 clinical features, meeting consensus-based TES criteria. When RHI exposure criterion was lifted, 33.5% of the LETBI sample with isolated TBI met all core clinical criteria. No significant differences were found in clinical diagnostic criteria between individuals with and without RHI exposure. When exploring consensus-based Levels of Diagnostic Certainty, rates of suggestive, possible, and probable CTE were found to be 2.7%, 6.8%, and 5.8%, respectively. No injury or demographic variables significantly predicted the likelihood of meeting all 3 Core Clinical Criteria for TES.<strong>Conclusion:</strong>In this community based TBI sample, we found high rates of TES clinical features among those with and without RHI, across TBI across injury severity groups. Presence of TES core clinical features was greatest among those with isolated TBI, suggesting that chronic and sometimes progressive sequelae of TBI are similar to those described in TES, but may reflect a distinct pathobiological process from CTE neuropathologic change which is very rarely seen in isolated TBI. Findings emphasize the centrality of RHI exposure to the TES diagnostic criteria. Lifetime exposure to TBI and RHI should be well characterized in studies of TES and post-TBI neuropathologies to advance understanding of the underlying biology of progressive clinical symptoms. This work supports further refinement of TES diagnostic criteria, which will require defining RHI exposure thresholds associated with CTE neuropathologic change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.04.24309955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.04.24309955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:创伤性脑病综合征(TES)是慢性创伤性脑病(CTE)的一种临床表现,被认为是由重复性头部撞击(RHI)引起的,目前还没有对单发创伤性脑损伤患者的创伤性脑病综合征发病率及其组成症状进行深入研究。目标:使用前瞻性收集的数据,根据共识研究诊断标准对 TES 进行操作化,并检查单独 TBI 患者样本中的 TES 发生率,其中一部分人还暴露于 RHI,并确定是否有任何人口统计学或损伤因素可预测符合 TES 诊断标准的可能性。样本按 TBI 严重程度和是否有 RHI 病史分为 6 组(孤立性轻度、中度和重度 TBI,有和无 RHI)。采用卡方检验比较各组中符合 TES 诊断核心临床标准的比例。二元逻辑回归模型用于检验人口统计学特征和损伤特征与 TES 诊断的相关性。对样本的功能依赖程度和CTE神经病理学的确定程度进行了描述,并将其与核心临床特征结合起来,以探索基于共识的各研究组CTE病理学的临时确定程度:除了有创伤性脑损伤病史外,141 名参与者(47.7%)还暴露于符合 TES 标准暴露阈值的 RHI。在全部样本中,分别有 56.9%、33.2% 和 45.7% 的参与者符合认知障碍、神经行为失调和临床特征进行性发展的 TES 核心标准。总体而言,在该 LETBI 样本中,有 15.2% 的人接触过大量 RHI,并符合所有 3 个临床特征,符合基于共识的 TES 标准。如果取消 RHI 暴露标准,33.5% 的 LETBI 隔离 TBI 样本符合所有核心临床标准。在临床诊断标准方面,暴露于和未暴露于 RHI 的个体之间未发现明显差异。在探讨基于共识的诊断确定性水平时,发现提示性、可能和疑似 CTE 的比率分别为 2.7%、6.8% 和 5.8%。结论:在这一基于社区的创伤性脑损伤样本中,我们发现在不同的创伤性脑损伤严重程度组别中,有RHI和无RHI者的创伤性脑损伤临床特征发生率都很高。TES核心临床特征在孤立性TBI患者中出现率最高,这表明TBI的慢性、有时是进行性的后遗症与TES中描述的症状相似,但可能反映了与CTE神经病理变化不同的病理生物学过程,而CTE神经病理变化在孤立性TBI中很少见。研究结果表明,RHI 暴露是 TES 诊断标准的核心。在对 TES 和 TBI 后神经病理学的研究中,应充分描述终生暴露于 TBI 和 RHI 的特征,以促进对渐进性临床症状的潜在生物学的了解。这项工作支持进一步完善 TES 诊断标准,这将需要定义与 CTE 神经病理学变化相关的 RHI 暴露阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome in the Late Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury (LETBI) study cohort
Importance:Traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES),the suggested clinical manifestation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy(CTE),is believed to result from repetitive head impacts (RHI) and the prevalence of TES and its component symptoms have not been thoroughly investigated in individuals with single TBI.Objective:To use prospectively collected data to operationalize TES per consensus research diagnostic criteria and examine the rates of TES in a sample of individuals with isolated TBI, a subset of whom also had RHI exposure, and to determine whether any demographic or injury factors predicted likelihood of meeting TES diagnostic criteria.Design:295 participants from the Late Effects of TBI (LETBI) study had complete data for all key variables. The sample was categorized by TBI severity and presence of RHI history leading to 6 groups (those with isolated mild, moderate, and severe TBI, with and without RHI). Chi-squared tests were used to compare the proportion of each group that met each of the core clinical criteria overall TES diagnosis. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the associations of demographic and injury characteristics on TES diagnosis. Levels of functional dependence and levels of certainty for CTE neuropathology in the sample were characterized and applied with the core clinical features to explore consensus-based provisional levels of certainty of CTE pathology across study groups.Results: In addition to history of TBI, 141 (47.7%) participants had RHI exposure meeting the TES criteria exposure threshold. In the full sample, 56.9%, 33.2% and 45.7% of participants met TES core criterion of cognitive impairment, neurobehavioral dysregulation, and progressive course of clinical features, respectively. Overall, 15.2% of this LETBI sample had substantial RHI exposure and met all 3 clinical features, meeting consensus-based TES criteria. When RHI exposure criterion was lifted, 33.5% of the LETBI sample with isolated TBI met all core clinical criteria. No significant differences were found in clinical diagnostic criteria between individuals with and without RHI exposure. When exploring consensus-based Levels of Diagnostic Certainty, rates of suggestive, possible, and probable CTE were found to be 2.7%, 6.8%, and 5.8%, respectively. No injury or demographic variables significantly predicted the likelihood of meeting all 3 Core Clinical Criteria for TES.Conclusion:In this community based TBI sample, we found high rates of TES clinical features among those with and without RHI, across TBI across injury severity groups. Presence of TES core clinical features was greatest among those with isolated TBI, suggesting that chronic and sometimes progressive sequelae of TBI are similar to those described in TES, but may reflect a distinct pathobiological process from CTE neuropathologic change which is very rarely seen in isolated TBI. Findings emphasize the centrality of RHI exposure to the TES diagnostic criteria. Lifetime exposure to TBI and RHI should be well characterized in studies of TES and post-TBI neuropathologies to advance understanding of the underlying biology of progressive clinical symptoms. This work supports further refinement of TES diagnostic criteria, which will require defining RHI exposure thresholds associated with CTE neuropathologic change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS: INTERPRETATION OF NON-STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN REHABILITATION Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1