提升最佳符号规划:运算器潜能启发式

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104174
{"title":"提升最佳符号规划:运算器潜能启发式","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Heuristic search guides the exploration of states via heuristic functions <em>h</em> estimating remaining cost. Symbolic search instead replaces the exploration of individual states with that of state sets, compactly represented using binary decision diagrams (BDDs). In cost-optimal planning, heuristic explicit search performs best overall, but symbolic search performs best in many individual domains, so both approaches together constitute the state of the art. Yet combinations of the two have so far not been an unqualified success, because (i) <em>h</em> must be applicable to sets of states rather than individual ones, and (ii) the different state partitioning induced by <em>h</em> may be detrimental for BDD size. Many competitive heuristic functions in planning do not qualify for (i), and it has been shown that even extremely informed heuristics can deteriorate search performance due to (ii).</p><p>Here we show how to achieve (i) for a state-of-the-art family of heuristic functions, namely potential heuristics. These assign a fixed potential value to each state-variable/value pair, ensuring by LP constraints that the sum over these values, for any state, yields an admissible and consistent heuristic function. Our key observation is that we can express potential heuristics through fixed potential values for operators instead, capturing the change of heuristic value induced by each operator. These reformulated heuristics satisfy (i) because we can express the heuristic value change as part of the BDD transition relation in symbolic search steps. We run exhaustive experiments on IPC benchmarks, evaluating several different instantiations of potential heuristics in forward, backward, and bi-directional symbolic search. Our operator-potential heuristics turn out to be highly beneficial, in particular they hardly ever suffer from (ii). Our best configurations soundly beat previous optimal symbolic planning algorithms, bringing them on par with the state of the art in optimal heuristic explicit search planning in overall performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001103/pdfft?md5=e96bd05f57c63e29d7f7ad8ddd65c0e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0004370224001103-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting optimal symbolic planning: Operator-potential heuristics\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Heuristic search guides the exploration of states via heuristic functions <em>h</em> estimating remaining cost. Symbolic search instead replaces the exploration of individual states with that of state sets, compactly represented using binary decision diagrams (BDDs). In cost-optimal planning, heuristic explicit search performs best overall, but symbolic search performs best in many individual domains, so both approaches together constitute the state of the art. Yet combinations of the two have so far not been an unqualified success, because (i) <em>h</em> must be applicable to sets of states rather than individual ones, and (ii) the different state partitioning induced by <em>h</em> may be detrimental for BDD size. Many competitive heuristic functions in planning do not qualify for (i), and it has been shown that even extremely informed heuristics can deteriorate search performance due to (ii).</p><p>Here we show how to achieve (i) for a state-of-the-art family of heuristic functions, namely potential heuristics. These assign a fixed potential value to each state-variable/value pair, ensuring by LP constraints that the sum over these values, for any state, yields an admissible and consistent heuristic function. Our key observation is that we can express potential heuristics through fixed potential values for operators instead, capturing the change of heuristic value induced by each operator. These reformulated heuristics satisfy (i) because we can express the heuristic value change as part of the BDD transition relation in symbolic search steps. We run exhaustive experiments on IPC benchmarks, evaluating several different instantiations of potential heuristics in forward, backward, and bi-directional symbolic search. Our operator-potential heuristics turn out to be highly beneficial, in particular they hardly ever suffer from (ii). Our best configurations soundly beat previous optimal symbolic planning algorithms, bringing them on par with the state of the art in optimal heuristic explicit search planning in overall performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001103/pdfft?md5=e96bd05f57c63e29d7f7ad8ddd65c0e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0004370224001103-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224001103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

启发式搜索通过估计剩余成本的启发式函数来引导对状态的探索。而符号搜索则用状态集代替了对单个状态的探索,状态集使用二元决策图(BDD)紧凑表示。在成本最优规划中,启发式显式搜索的整体表现最佳,但符号搜索在许多单个领域表现最佳,因此这两种方法共同构成了最先进的技术。然而,迄今为止,这两种方法的组合并没有取得绝对的成功,原因在于:(i) 必须适用于状态集而非单个状态;(ii) 不同的状态划分可能不利于 BDD 的大小。在规划中,许多有竞争力的启发式函数都不符合(i)的条件,而且事实证明,即使是极为明智的启发式函数,也会因为(ii)而降低搜索性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boosting optimal symbolic planning: Operator-potential heuristics

Heuristic search guides the exploration of states via heuristic functions h estimating remaining cost. Symbolic search instead replaces the exploration of individual states with that of state sets, compactly represented using binary decision diagrams (BDDs). In cost-optimal planning, heuristic explicit search performs best overall, but symbolic search performs best in many individual domains, so both approaches together constitute the state of the art. Yet combinations of the two have so far not been an unqualified success, because (i) h must be applicable to sets of states rather than individual ones, and (ii) the different state partitioning induced by h may be detrimental for BDD size. Many competitive heuristic functions in planning do not qualify for (i), and it has been shown that even extremely informed heuristics can deteriorate search performance due to (ii).

Here we show how to achieve (i) for a state-of-the-art family of heuristic functions, namely potential heuristics. These assign a fixed potential value to each state-variable/value pair, ensuring by LP constraints that the sum over these values, for any state, yields an admissible and consistent heuristic function. Our key observation is that we can express potential heuristics through fixed potential values for operators instead, capturing the change of heuristic value induced by each operator. These reformulated heuristics satisfy (i) because we can express the heuristic value change as part of the BDD transition relation in symbolic search steps. We run exhaustive experiments on IPC benchmarks, evaluating several different instantiations of potential heuristics in forward, backward, and bi-directional symbolic search. Our operator-potential heuristics turn out to be highly beneficial, in particular they hardly ever suffer from (ii). Our best configurations soundly beat previous optimal symbolic planning algorithms, bringing them on par with the state of the art in optimal heuristic explicit search planning in overall performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.
期刊最新文献
Integration of memory systems supporting non-symbolic representations in an architecture for lifelong development of artificial agents Editorial Board PathLAD+: Towards effective exact methods for subgraph isomorphism problem Interval abstractions for robust counterfactual explanations Approximating problems in abstract argumentation with graph convolutional networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1