姑息关怀与终末期肝病:一项调查研究,比较肝病科和姑息关怀科医生的观点以及可能需要姑息关怀干预的临床情况。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102416
{"title":"姑息关怀与终末期肝病:一项调查研究,比较肝病科和姑息关怀科医生的观点以及可能需要姑息关怀干预的临床情况。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end stage liver disease (ESLD) the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden of these patients, integration of palliative care is reduced. We aim to analyze the agreement between palliative care and hepatology physicians of clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted. Palliative care and hepatology physicians were surveyed. Using a five-point Likert scale, their perceptions of palliative care in ESLD were rated. Their agreement in clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention were evaluated. Analyses were conducted to assess any differences by primary role (hepatology vs. palliative care) and length of practice (&lt;10 years vs. 10 years).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 123 responses were obtained: 52% from palliative care and 48% from hepatology. The majority (66.7%) work in the field for up to ten years. There was a great consensus in 4 of the 8 clinical scenarios. In scenarios with less consensus, the area of activity and length of practice influence the reliance of physicians on palliative care. Involvement of palliative care in ESLD was considered “rare” by 30% and 61% consider difficult to predict the prognosis. More than 90% support medical training in both areas of activity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The current involvement of palliative care is considered low, but there are clinical conditions that reveal a clear consensus and there's a unanimous view of the relevance of training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001372/pdfft?md5=07fbbf8cf5942a191ffe376254badbbf&pid=1-s2.0-S2210740124001372-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative care and end stage liver disease: A survey study comparing perspectives of hepatology and palliative care physicians and clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end stage liver disease (ESLD) the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden of these patients, integration of palliative care is reduced. We aim to analyze the agreement between palliative care and hepatology physicians of clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted. Palliative care and hepatology physicians were surveyed. Using a five-point Likert scale, their perceptions of palliative care in ESLD were rated. Their agreement in clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention were evaluated. Analyses were conducted to assess any differences by primary role (hepatology vs. palliative care) and length of practice (&lt;10 years vs. 10 years).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 123 responses were obtained: 52% from palliative care and 48% from hepatology. The majority (66.7%) work in the field for up to ten years. There was a great consensus in 4 of the 8 clinical scenarios. In scenarios with less consensus, the area of activity and length of practice influence the reliance of physicians on palliative care. Involvement of palliative care in ESLD was considered “rare” by 30% and 61% consider difficult to predict the prognosis. More than 90% support medical training in both areas of activity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The current involvement of palliative care is considered low, but there are clinical conditions that reveal a clear consensus and there's a unanimous view of the relevance of training.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001372/pdfft?md5=07fbbf8cf5942a191ffe376254badbbf&pid=1-s2.0-S2210740124001372-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:慢性肝病的发病率和死亡率大幅上升。终末期肝病(ESLD)患者的生存期约为 2 年。尽管这些患者的预后较差,症状负担较重,但姑息治疗的整合程度却很低。我们旨在分析姑息治疗医生和肝病医生对可能需要姑息治疗干预的临床情况的共识:方法:我们进行了一项横断面研究。我们对姑息关怀医生和肝病医生进行了调查。采用李克特五点量表对他们对 ESLD 姑息关怀的看法进行评分。评估了他们对可能需要姑息治疗干预的临床情景的认同度。对主要角色(肝病科与姑息治疗科)和执业时间的差异进行了分析评估(结果:共收到 123 份回复:52%来自姑息治疗,48%来自肝病科。大多数人(66.7%)在该领域工作长达十年。在 8 个临床场景中,有 4 个场景达成了广泛共识。在共识较少的情况下,工作领域和执业年限影响着医生对姑息关怀的依赖程度。30%的人认为姑息治疗在 ESLD 中 "罕见",61%的人认为难以预测预后。90%以上的人支持在这两个领域开展医学培训:结论:目前参与姑息治疗的比例较低,但有一些临床病例显示出明确的共识,并且一致认为培训具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative care and end stage liver disease: A survey study comparing perspectives of hepatology and palliative care physicians and clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention

Background and aims

The prevalence and mortality of chronic liver disease has risen significantly. In end stage liver disease (ESLD) the survival of patients is approximately 2 years. Despite the poor prognosis and high symptom burden of these patients, integration of palliative care is reduced. We aim to analyze the agreement between palliative care and hepatology physicians of clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Palliative care and hepatology physicians were surveyed. Using a five-point Likert scale, their perceptions of palliative care in ESLD were rated. Their agreement in clinical scenarios that could require palliative care intervention were evaluated. Analyses were conducted to assess any differences by primary role (hepatology vs. palliative care) and length of practice (<10 years vs. 10 years).

Results

A total of 123 responses were obtained: 52% from palliative care and 48% from hepatology. The majority (66.7%) work in the field for up to ten years. There was a great consensus in 4 of the 8 clinical scenarios. In scenarios with less consensus, the area of activity and length of practice influence the reliance of physicians on palliative care. Involvement of palliative care in ESLD was considered “rare” by 30% and 61% consider difficult to predict the prognosis. More than 90% support medical training in both areas of activity.

Conclusion

The current involvement of palliative care is considered low, but there are clinical conditions that reveal a clear consensus and there's a unanimous view of the relevance of training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct). Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Real-life effectiveness of allogeneic expanded adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for perianal fistulizing refractory Crohn's disease. Optimization of endoscopic treatment strategies for R0 resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 10 mm. Propensity score matching-based analysis of the effect of corticosteroids in treating severe drug-induced liver injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1