使用市售 0.55-T 扫描仪进行心脏动态磁共振成像

IF 3.8 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1148/ryct.230331
Martin Segeroth, David J Winkel, Jan Vosshenrich, Hanns-Christian Breit, Daniel Giese, Philip Haaf, Michael J Zellweger, Jens Bremerich, Francesco Santini, Maurice Pradella
{"title":"使用市售 0.55-T 扫描仪进行心脏动态磁共振成像","authors":"Martin Segeroth, David J Winkel, Jan Vosshenrich, Hanns-Christian Breit, Daniel Giese, Philip Haaf, Michael J Zellweger, Jens Bremerich, Francesco Santini, Maurice Pradella","doi":"10.1148/ryct.230331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To compare parameters of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume and function between a commercially available 0.55-T low-field-strength cardiac cine MRI scanner and a 1.5-T scanner. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, healthy volunteers (May 2022 to July 2022) underwent same-day cine imaging using both scanners (0.55 T, 1.5 T). Volumetric and functional parameters were assessed by two experts. After analyzing the results of a blinded crossover reader study of the healthy volunteers, 20 participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were prospectively included (November 2022 to February 2023). In a second blinded expert reading, parameters from clinical 1.5-T scans in these participants were compared with those same-day 0.55-T scans. Results are displayed as Bland-Altman plots. Results Eleven healthy volunteers (mean age: 33 years [95% CI: 27, 40]; four of 11 [36%] female, seven of 11 [64%] male) were included. Very strong mean correlation was observed (<i>r</i> = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). Average deviation between MRI systems was 1.6% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.9) for both readers. Twenty participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were included (mean age: 55 years [95% CI: 48, 62], six of 20 [30%] female, 14 of 20 [70%] male). Mean correlation was very strong (<i>r</i> = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). LV and RV parameters demonstrated an average deviation of 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.1) between MRI systems. Conclusion Cardiac cine MRI at 0.55 T yielded comparable results for quantitative biventricular volumetric and functional parameters compared with routine imaging at 1.5 T, if acquisition time is doubled. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiac, Comparative Studies, Heart, Cardiovascular MRI, Cine, Myocardium <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Cine MRI Using a Commercially Available 0.55-T Scanner.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Segeroth, David J Winkel, Jan Vosshenrich, Hanns-Christian Breit, Daniel Giese, Philip Haaf, Michael J Zellweger, Jens Bremerich, Francesco Santini, Maurice Pradella\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryct.230331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To compare parameters of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume and function between a commercially available 0.55-T low-field-strength cardiac cine MRI scanner and a 1.5-T scanner. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, healthy volunteers (May 2022 to July 2022) underwent same-day cine imaging using both scanners (0.55 T, 1.5 T). Volumetric and functional parameters were assessed by two experts. After analyzing the results of a blinded crossover reader study of the healthy volunteers, 20 participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were prospectively included (November 2022 to February 2023). In a second blinded expert reading, parameters from clinical 1.5-T scans in these participants were compared with those same-day 0.55-T scans. Results are displayed as Bland-Altman plots. Results Eleven healthy volunteers (mean age: 33 years [95% CI: 27, 40]; four of 11 [36%] female, seven of 11 [64%] male) were included. Very strong mean correlation was observed (<i>r</i> = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). Average deviation between MRI systems was 1.6% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.9) for both readers. Twenty participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were included (mean age: 55 years [95% CI: 48, 62], six of 20 [30%] female, 14 of 20 [70%] male). Mean correlation was very strong (<i>r</i> = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). LV and RV parameters demonstrated an average deviation of 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.1) between MRI systems. Conclusion Cardiac cine MRI at 0.55 T yielded comparable results for quantitative biventricular volumetric and functional parameters compared with routine imaging at 1.5 T, if acquisition time is doubled. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiac, Comparative Studies, Heart, Cardiovascular MRI, Cine, Myocardium <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.230331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.230331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 比较市售 0.55 T 低场强心脏核磁共振成像扫描仪和 1.5 T 扫描仪的左心室和右心室容积和功能参数。材料和方法 在这项前瞻性研究中,健康志愿者(2022 年 5 月至 2022 年 7 月)使用两种扫描仪(0.55 T 和 1.5 T)接受了当天的 cine 成像。由两名专家对体积和功能参数进行评估。在对健康志愿者的盲法交叉阅读研究结果进行分析后,前瞻性地纳入了 20 名有临床指征的心脏磁共振成像参与者(2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月)。在第二次专家盲读中,这些参与者的临床 1.5-T 扫描参数与当天的 0.55-T 扫描参数进行了比较。结果显示为布兰-阿尔特曼图。结果 共纳入 11 名健康志愿者(平均年龄:33 岁 [95% CI:27,40];11 人中有 4 名女性 [36%],11 人中有 7 名男性 [64%])。观察到非常强的平均相关性(r = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98])。两位读者的磁共振成像系统之间的平均偏差为 1.6% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.9)。20 名有临床指征的心脏磁共振成像参与者(平均年龄:55 岁 [95% CI:48,62],20 人中有 6 名女性 [30%],20 人中有 14 名男性 [70%])被纳入其中。平均相关性非常强(r = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98])。核磁共振成像系统之间的左心室和左心室参数平均偏差为 1.1%(95% CI:0.1,2.1)。结论 如果采集时间延长一倍,0.55 T 的心脏 cine MRI 与 1.5 T 的常规成像相比,在定量双心室容积和功能参数方面结果相当。关键词心脏,比较研究,心脏,心血管磁共振成像,Cine,心肌 本文有补充材料。©RSNA, 2024.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac Cine MRI Using a Commercially Available 0.55-T Scanner.

Purpose To compare parameters of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume and function between a commercially available 0.55-T low-field-strength cardiac cine MRI scanner and a 1.5-T scanner. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, healthy volunteers (May 2022 to July 2022) underwent same-day cine imaging using both scanners (0.55 T, 1.5 T). Volumetric and functional parameters were assessed by two experts. After analyzing the results of a blinded crossover reader study of the healthy volunteers, 20 participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were prospectively included (November 2022 to February 2023). In a second blinded expert reading, parameters from clinical 1.5-T scans in these participants were compared with those same-day 0.55-T scans. Results are displayed as Bland-Altman plots. Results Eleven healthy volunteers (mean age: 33 years [95% CI: 27, 40]; four of 11 [36%] female, seven of 11 [64%] male) were included. Very strong mean correlation was observed (r = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). Average deviation between MRI systems was 1.6% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.9) for both readers. Twenty participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were included (mean age: 55 years [95% CI: 48, 62], six of 20 [30%] female, 14 of 20 [70%] male). Mean correlation was very strong (r = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). LV and RV parameters demonstrated an average deviation of 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.1) between MRI systems. Conclusion Cardiac cine MRI at 0.55 T yielded comparable results for quantitative biventricular volumetric and functional parameters compared with routine imaging at 1.5 T, if acquisition time is doubled. Keywords: Cardiac, Comparative Studies, Heart, Cardiovascular MRI, Cine, Myocardium Supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Association of Aortic Stiffness with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: New Insights into the Ventriculoarterial Connection. Severe Quadricuspid Pulmonary Valve Stenosis Presenting as Scrotal Edema. Collateral Circulation in Coarctation. Geometric Changes in Mitral Valve Apparatus during Long-term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy as Assessed with Cardiac CT. Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1