了解在线卵母细胞冷冻保存计算器的优势和局限性。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Seminars in reproductive medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788030
Amber T Wolf, Evelyn Minis, Shruthi Mahalingaiah
{"title":"了解在线卵母细胞冷冻保存计算器的优势和局限性。","authors":"Amber T Wolf, Evelyn Minis, Shruthi Mahalingaiah","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between 2010 and 2016, elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) increased in use by 880% in the United States; however, there have been increasing reports of regret among patients after elective OC. There is a growing need for individualized counseling on the timing and number of oocytes to cryopreserve for patients to make informed choices and set realistic expectations, but currently available tools seem to be insufficient. The purpose of this review is to describe the OC calculators currently available online, identify sources of regret, and illustrate the need for unified counseling tools for improved patient care and education. OC calculators were identified via Google search. Only calculators that cite scientific literature were included in the review. Calculators for in vitro fertilization or embryo transfer were excluded. Thirteen OC calculators were found; however, only six cited literature supporting the calculator's design. When entering the same hypothetical patient parameters for age and number of oocytes cryopreserved, the calculators provided drastically different probabilities of live births. The lack of cohesive online educational materials creates confusion and stress for patients considering OC, leading to unrealistic expectations and increased feelings of regret thereafter. Physicians need tools to provide comprehensive guidance to patients seeking to cryopreserve oocytes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21661,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"130-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Online Oocyte Cryopreservation Calculators.\",\"authors\":\"Amber T Wolf, Evelyn Minis, Shruthi Mahalingaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Between 2010 and 2016, elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) increased in use by 880% in the United States; however, there have been increasing reports of regret among patients after elective OC. There is a growing need for individualized counseling on the timing and number of oocytes to cryopreserve for patients to make informed choices and set realistic expectations, but currently available tools seem to be insufficient. The purpose of this review is to describe the OC calculators currently available online, identify sources of regret, and illustrate the need for unified counseling tools for improved patient care and education. OC calculators were identified via Google search. Only calculators that cite scientific literature were included in the review. Calculators for in vitro fertilization or embryo transfer were excluded. Thirteen OC calculators were found; however, only six cited literature supporting the calculator's design. When entering the same hypothetical patient parameters for age and number of oocytes cryopreserved, the calculators provided drastically different probabilities of live births. The lack of cohesive online educational materials creates confusion and stress for patients considering OC, leading to unrealistic expectations and increased feelings of regret thereafter. Physicians need tools to provide comprehensive guidance to patients seeking to cryopreserve oocytes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"130-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2010 年至 2016 年间,美国选择性卵母细胞冷冻保存(OC)的使用率增加了 880%;然而,越来越多的报告显示,患者在选择性 OC 后感到后悔。越来越多的患者需要就冷冻卵母细胞的时机和数量进行个体化咨询,以便做出知情选择并设定切合实际的期望值,但目前可用的工具似乎并不充分。本综述旨在描述目前网上可用的 OC 计算器,确定遗憾的来源,并说明需要统一的咨询工具来改善患者护理和教育。OC 计算器是通过谷歌搜索找到的。只有引用科学文献的计算器才被纳入审查范围。体外受精或胚胎移植的计算器不包括在内。共找到 13 个 OC 计算器,但只有 6 个计算器引用了支持计算器设计的文献。当输入相同的假设患者年龄和冷冻卵母细胞数量参数时,计算器提供的活产概率却大相径庭。缺乏连贯的在线教育材料给考虑进行卵细胞移植的患者造成了困惑和压力,导致他们产生不切实际的期望,并在之后增加了后悔的情绪。医生需要一些工具来为寻求冷冻卵母细胞的患者提供全面的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Online Oocyte Cryopreservation Calculators.

Between 2010 and 2016, elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) increased in use by 880% in the United States; however, there have been increasing reports of regret among patients after elective OC. There is a growing need for individualized counseling on the timing and number of oocytes to cryopreserve for patients to make informed choices and set realistic expectations, but currently available tools seem to be insufficient. The purpose of this review is to describe the OC calculators currently available online, identify sources of regret, and illustrate the need for unified counseling tools for improved patient care and education. OC calculators were identified via Google search. Only calculators that cite scientific literature were included in the review. Calculators for in vitro fertilization or embryo transfer were excluded. Thirteen OC calculators were found; however, only six cited literature supporting the calculator's design. When entering the same hypothetical patient parameters for age and number of oocytes cryopreserved, the calculators provided drastically different probabilities of live births. The lack of cohesive online educational materials creates confusion and stress for patients considering OC, leading to unrealistic expectations and increased feelings of regret thereafter. Physicians need tools to provide comprehensive guidance to patients seeking to cryopreserve oocytes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in reproductive medicine
Seminars in reproductive medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine is a bi-monthly topic driven review journal that provides in-depth coverage of important advances in the understanding of normal and disordered human reproductive function, as well as new diagnostic and interventional techniques. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine offers an informed perspective on issues like male and female infertility, reproductive physiology, pharmacological hormonal manipulation, and state-of-the-art assisted reproductive technologies.
期刊最新文献
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Pregnancy: Managing Disease Activity and Fertility Concerns. Impact of Antiphospholipid Syndrome on Reproductive Outcomes: Current Insights and Management Approaches. A Review of Celiac Disease and Its Implications on Fertility and Pregnancy. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Reproductive Health: A Focus on Pregnancy Planning and Outcomes. Type 1 Diabetes and Pregnancy: Challenges in Glycemic Control and Maternal-Fetal Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1