改善血液透析患者的营养不良筛查。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.3148/cjdpr-2024-002
Arti Sharma Parpia, Teresa J Valenzano, Rachael Bosma, Brianna Bavota, Gabrielle Deveaux, Ron Wald, Kimberley Bradley
{"title":"改善血液透析患者的营养不良筛查。","authors":"Arti Sharma Parpia, Teresa J Valenzano, Rachael Bosma, Brianna Bavota, Gabrielle Deveaux, Ron Wald, Kimberley Bradley","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2024-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals receiving hemodialysis are at increased risk of malnutrition; however, regular diagnosis of malnutrition using subjective global assessment (SGA) is time-consuming. This study aimed to determine whether the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) or the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) screening tools could accurately identify hemodialysis patients at risk for malnutrition. A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for in-centre day shift hemodialysis patients (n = 95) to obtain the results of the SGA assessment and the CNST screener and to calculate the GNRI score. Sensitivity and specificity analyses showed only a fair agreement between the SGA and CNST (sensitivity = 20%; specificity 96%; κ = .210 (95% CI, -0.015 to .435), <i>p</i> < .05) and between the SGA and GNRI (sensitivity = 35%; specificity = 88%; κ = .248 (95% CI, .017 to .479), <i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant statistical difference between the accuracy of either tool in identifying patients at risk of malnutrition (<i>p</i> = .50). The CNST and GNRI do not accurately screen for risk of malnutrition in the hemodialysis population; therefore, further studies are needed to determine an effective malnutrition screening tool in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56135,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":"157-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Malnutrition Screening among Hemodialysis Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Arti Sharma Parpia, Teresa J Valenzano, Rachael Bosma, Brianna Bavota, Gabrielle Deveaux, Ron Wald, Kimberley Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.3148/cjdpr-2024-002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individuals receiving hemodialysis are at increased risk of malnutrition; however, regular diagnosis of malnutrition using subjective global assessment (SGA) is time-consuming. This study aimed to determine whether the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) or the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) screening tools could accurately identify hemodialysis patients at risk for malnutrition. A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for in-centre day shift hemodialysis patients (n = 95) to obtain the results of the SGA assessment and the CNST screener and to calculate the GNRI score. Sensitivity and specificity analyses showed only a fair agreement between the SGA and CNST (sensitivity = 20%; specificity 96%; κ = .210 (95% CI, -0.015 to .435), <i>p</i> < .05) and between the SGA and GNRI (sensitivity = 35%; specificity = 88%; κ = .248 (95% CI, .017 to .479), <i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant statistical difference between the accuracy of either tool in identifying patients at risk of malnutrition (<i>p</i> = .50). The CNST and GNRI do not accurately screen for risk of malnutrition in the hemodialysis population; therefore, further studies are needed to determine an effective malnutrition screening tool in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"157-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受血液透析的患者营养不良的风险增加;然而,使用主观全面评估 (SGA) 定期诊断营养不良非常耗时。本研究旨在确定加拿大营养筛查工具(CNST)或老年营养风险指数(GNRI)筛查工具能否准确识别有营养不良风险的血液透析患者。我们对中心日班血液透析患者(95 人)进行了回顾性病历审查,以获得 SGA 评估和 CNST 筛选器的结果,并计算 GNRI 分数。灵敏度和特异性分析表明,SGA 和 CNST 之间的一致性一般(灵敏度 = 20%;特异性 96%;κ = .210 (95% CI, -0.015 to .435), p p = .50)。CNST 和 GNRI 无法准确筛查血液透析人群的营养不良风险;因此,需要进一步研究以确定该人群中有效的营养不良筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Malnutrition Screening among Hemodialysis Patients.

Individuals receiving hemodialysis are at increased risk of malnutrition; however, regular diagnosis of malnutrition using subjective global assessment (SGA) is time-consuming. This study aimed to determine whether the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) or the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) screening tools could accurately identify hemodialysis patients at risk for malnutrition. A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for in-centre day shift hemodialysis patients (n = 95) to obtain the results of the SGA assessment and the CNST screener and to calculate the GNRI score. Sensitivity and specificity analyses showed only a fair agreement between the SGA and CNST (sensitivity = 20%; specificity 96%; κ = .210 (95% CI, -0.015 to .435), p < .05) and between the SGA and GNRI (sensitivity = 35%; specificity = 88%; κ = .248 (95% CI, .017 to .479), p < .05). There was no significant statistical difference between the accuracy of either tool in identifying patients at risk of malnutrition (p = .50). The CNST and GNRI do not accurately screen for risk of malnutrition in the hemodialysis population; therefore, further studies are needed to determine an effective malnutrition screening tool in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal considers manuscripts for publication that focus on applied food and nutrition research with direct application to the Canadian healthcare system and other contributions relevant to Canadian dietetic practice. The Journal does not publish market research studies, author opinions or animal studies. Manuscripts may be in English or French.
期刊最新文献
Parent/Caregiver Perceptions of the Good Food for Learning Universal School Lunch Program in Canada. From Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion to Justice: Calling in for Collective Learning and Action on Racism in Dietetics. Exploring the Social Determinants of Health in Nutrition Care for South Asian Communities: A Narrative Review. Examination of the Feelings and Experiences of Postpartum Mothers Engaging with Social Media: A Qualitative Study. Identifying and Mapping Canadian Registered Dietitians' Perceptions and Knowledge of and Experiences with Weight-Related Evidence: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1