长期癫痫相关肿瘤(LEATs)术后是否需要继续服用抗癫痫药物?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108433
Kavadisseril Vivekanandan Vysakha, Kshiteeja Jain, Jayakumari Nandana, Karamala Yalapalli Manisha, Ramshekhar N. Menon, George Vilanilam, Mathew Abraham, Bejoy Thomas, Chandrashekharan Kesavadas, Ashalatha Radhakrishnan
{"title":"长期癫痫相关肿瘤(LEATs)术后是否需要继续服用抗癫痫药物?","authors":"Kavadisseril Vivekanandan Vysakha,&nbsp;Kshiteeja Jain,&nbsp;Jayakumari Nandana,&nbsp;Karamala Yalapalli Manisha,&nbsp;Ramshekhar N. Menon,&nbsp;George Vilanilam,&nbsp;Mathew Abraham,&nbsp;Bejoy Thomas,&nbsp;Chandrashekharan Kesavadas,&nbsp;Ashalatha Radhakrishnan","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify the rate of successful antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after resective surgery in patients with long-term epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis (from our prospectively archived data) on the post-operative ASM profile of 123 consecutive patients who completed a minimum of 2 years after resection of LEATs for ASM-resistant epilepsy. A comparison between recurred and non-recurred groups in terms of seizure recurrence was used to identify the potential predictors of seizure recurrence whose attributes were further analyzed using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to study the probability of ASM freedom following surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We attempted ASM withdrawal in 102 (82.9 %) patients. Forty-eight (47.1 %) had seizure recurrence while reducing ASM, of which 22 (21.6 %) continued to have seizures even after ASM optimisation. On univariate analysis, presence of pre-operative secondary generalized seizure(s) was the only factor associated with seizure recurrence. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, 72 (58.5 %) patients were seizure-free and aura-free at terminal follow-up (53 patients were off any ASM). The cumulative probability of achieving complete ASM-free status was 29 % at fourth year, 42 % at sixth year, 55 % at eighth year, and 59 % at 10th year after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Following resective surgery for LEATs, ASM(s) could be successfully discontinued in half of the patients. About one-third of the patients may have recurrent seizures on follow-up. Presence of secondary generalized seizure(s) prior to surgery predicts seizure recurrence, whereas MRI defined completeness of resection will not. This information will help in rationalising decisions on ASM management post-resection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we have to continue antiseizure medications post surgery in long-term epilepsy associated tumors (LEATs)?\",\"authors\":\"Kavadisseril Vivekanandan Vysakha,&nbsp;Kshiteeja Jain,&nbsp;Jayakumari Nandana,&nbsp;Karamala Yalapalli Manisha,&nbsp;Ramshekhar N. Menon,&nbsp;George Vilanilam,&nbsp;Mathew Abraham,&nbsp;Bejoy Thomas,&nbsp;Chandrashekharan Kesavadas,&nbsp;Ashalatha Radhakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify the rate of successful antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after resective surgery in patients with long-term epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis (from our prospectively archived data) on the post-operative ASM profile of 123 consecutive patients who completed a minimum of 2 years after resection of LEATs for ASM-resistant epilepsy. A comparison between recurred and non-recurred groups in terms of seizure recurrence was used to identify the potential predictors of seizure recurrence whose attributes were further analyzed using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to study the probability of ASM freedom following surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We attempted ASM withdrawal in 102 (82.9 %) patients. Forty-eight (47.1 %) had seizure recurrence while reducing ASM, of which 22 (21.6 %) continued to have seizures even after ASM optimisation. On univariate analysis, presence of pre-operative secondary generalized seizure(s) was the only factor associated with seizure recurrence. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, 72 (58.5 %) patients were seizure-free and aura-free at terminal follow-up (53 patients were off any ASM). The cumulative probability of achieving complete ASM-free status was 29 % at fourth year, 42 % at sixth year, 55 % at eighth year, and 59 % at 10th year after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Following resective surgery for LEATs, ASM(s) could be successfully discontinued in half of the patients. About one-third of the patients may have recurrent seizures on follow-up. Presence of secondary generalized seizure(s) prior to surgery predicts seizure recurrence, whereas MRI defined completeness of resection will not. This information will help in rationalising decisions on ASM management post-resection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 回顾性分析(来自我们的前瞻性存档数据)连续 123 例因抗癫痫药物耐药的癫痫相关肿瘤(LEATs)切除术后至少 2 年的患者的术后抗癫痫药物情况。通过比较复发组和非复发组的癫痫复发情况,确定了癫痫复发的潜在预测因素,并通过单变量和多元逻辑回归分析进一步分析了这些预测因素的属性。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线研究手术后无 ASM 的概率。48名患者(47.1%)在减少ASM的同时癫痫复发,其中22名患者(21.6%)即使在优化ASM后仍有癫痫发作。经单变量分析,术前存在继发性全身癫痫发作是唯一与癫痫复发相关的因素。在平均 6.1 年的随访中,72 例(58.5%)患者在终末随访时无癫痫发作和先兆(53 例患者停止了任何 ASM)。术后第 4 年、第 6 年、第 8 年和第 10 年实现完全无 ASM 状态的累积概率分别为 29%、42%、55% 和 59%。结论LEATs切除手术后,半数患者可成功停用ASM,约三分之一的患者在随访时可能会复发。手术前出现继发性全身癫痫发作可预测癫痫复发,而核磁共振成像确定的切除完整性则不能预测癫痫复发。这些信息将有助于合理决定切除术后的 ASM 管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do we have to continue antiseizure medications post surgery in long-term epilepsy associated tumors (LEATs)?

Objective

To identify the rate of successful antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after resective surgery in patients with long-term epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs).

Methods

A retrospective analysis (from our prospectively archived data) on the post-operative ASM profile of 123 consecutive patients who completed a minimum of 2 years after resection of LEATs for ASM-resistant epilepsy. A comparison between recurred and non-recurred groups in terms of seizure recurrence was used to identify the potential predictors of seizure recurrence whose attributes were further analyzed using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to study the probability of ASM freedom following surgery.

Results

We attempted ASM withdrawal in 102 (82.9 %) patients. Forty-eight (47.1 %) had seizure recurrence while reducing ASM, of which 22 (21.6 %) continued to have seizures even after ASM optimisation. On univariate analysis, presence of pre-operative secondary generalized seizure(s) was the only factor associated with seizure recurrence. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, 72 (58.5 %) patients were seizure-free and aura-free at terminal follow-up (53 patients were off any ASM). The cumulative probability of achieving complete ASM-free status was 29 % at fourth year, 42 % at sixth year, 55 % at eighth year, and 59 % at 10th year after surgery.

Conclusions

Following resective surgery for LEATs, ASM(s) could be successfully discontinued in half of the patients. About one-third of the patients may have recurrent seizures on follow-up. Presence of secondary generalized seizure(s) prior to surgery predicts seizure recurrence, whereas MRI defined completeness of resection will not. This information will help in rationalising decisions on ASM management post-resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Pre-operative collapsed disc is a negative prognostic factor of back-pain outcome in trans-foraminal endoscopic discectomy. A single cohort clinical study Validation of a diagnostic support tool for early recognition of cervical arterial dissection in primary care Tirofiban vs. aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Editorial Board Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1